What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
- The Internet
- Computer network
- Computer security
George Danezis mostly deals with Computer security, Anonymity, Traffic analysis, Location data and Internet privacy.
In general Computer security study, his work on Onion routing, Cryptography and Adversary often relates to the realm of Electric power distribution, thereby connecting several areas of interest.
His Adversary study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Hash table and Distributed computing.
George Danezis has researched Anonymity in several fields, including Telecommunications network and Set.
His studies deal with areas such as Variety, Algorithm, Real-time computing and Data science as well as Traffic analysis.
His work carried out in the field of Internet privacy brings together such families of science as World Wide Web, Web crawler and User privacy.
His most cited work include:
- Mixminion: design of a type III anonymous remailer protocol (628 citations)
- Low-cost traffic analysis of Tor (447 citations)
- Towards an information theoretic metric for anonymity (421 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Computer security, Anonymity, Internet privacy, Cryptography and World Wide Web.
His studies in Computer security integrate themes in fields like Protocol and Covert channel.
His Anonymity study combines topics in areas such as Telecommunications network, Security analysis, Traffic analysis and Communications system.
His Traffic analysis study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Crowds, Bayesian inference and Anonymity system.
George Danezis regularly links together related areas like The Internet in his Internet privacy studies.
His research in Cryptography is mostly focused on Mix network.
He most often published in these fields:
- Computer security (54.81%)
- Anonymity (23.01%)
- Internet privacy (18.83%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2015-2020)?
- Computer security (54.81%)
- Anonymity (23.01%)
- Machine learning (5.02%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
His primary areas of investigation include Computer security, Anonymity, Machine learning, Artificial intelligence and Scalability.
His Computer security study incorporates themes from Protocol and Internet privacy.
His Anonymity research incorporates themes from Overhead, Private information retrieval, Traffic analysis, Adversary and Differential privacy.
His Machine learning research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Adversarial system, Generative grammar and Steganography.
His study in Scalability is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Computer architecture, Database transaction and Hash function.
His research integrates issues of Service provider and Key, Public-key cryptography in his study of Cryptography.
Between 2015 and 2020, his most popular works were:
- Centrally Banked Cryptocurrencies (125 citations)
- LOGAN: Membership Inference Attacks Against Generative Models (119 citations)
- Consensus in the Age of Blockchains. (118 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- The Internet
- Computer network
- Operating system
Scalability, Artificial intelligence, Machine learning, Generative grammar and Computer security are his primary areas of study.
His research in Scalability intersects with topics in Computer architecture, Verifiable secret sharing and Smart contract.
His Generative grammar research incorporates elements of Stability, Inference, Leverage and Robustness.
In his work, George Danezis performs multidisciplinary research in Computer security and Byzantine fault tolerance.
His Artificial neural network research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Scheme and Steganography.
George Danezis has included themes like Cryptography, Peer-to-peer, Information technology and Decentralised system in his Key study.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
