World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
49
Citations
11544
World Ranking
5816
National Ranking
121

Bryan Ford publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bryan Ford sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 161 publications — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Bryan Ford D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bryan Ford sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Bryan Ford is affiliated with the École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne in Switzerland. Their research primarily spans the field of Computer Science, with a focus on multiple subfields including Artificial Intelligence, Information Systems, Computer Networks and Communications, Sociology and Political Science, and Economics and Econometrics.

The scientist's work covers several key topics in modern computing and digital systems:

  • Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
  • Internet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting
  • Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
  • Cryptography and Data Security
  • Distributed systems and fault tolerance
  • Advanced Data Storage Technologies
  • Network Security and Intrusion Detection

Bryan Ford has contributed to a range of publications. The notable recent papers include:

  • "CALYPSO," 2020, Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment
  • "Design Choices for Central Bank Digital Currency: Policy and Technical Considerations," 2020, SSRN Electronic Journal (two separate entries with different citation counts)
  • "PriFi: Low-Latency Anonymity for Organizational Networks," 2020, DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)
  • "Identity and Personhood in Digital Democracy: Evaluating Inclusion, Equality, Security, and Privacy in Pseudonym Parties and Other Proofs of Personhood," 2020, arXiv (Cornell University)

The frequent co-authors collaborating with Bryan Ford include:

  • Vero Estrada-Galiñanes
  • Louis-Henri Merino
  • Philipp Jovanovic
  • Ewa Syta
  • Haoqian Zhang

Bryan Ford's research has been published in several venues. Among the most frequent publication outlets are:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies
  • Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)

Best Publications

  • OmniLedger: A Secure, Scale-Out, Decentralized Ledger via Sharding

    Eleftherios Kokoris-Kogias;Philipp Jovanovic;Linus Gasser;Nicolas Gailly

  • Enhancing Bitcoin Security and Performance with Strong Consistency via Collective Signing

    Eleftherios Kokoris-Kogias;Philipp Jovanovic;Nicolas Gailly;Ismail Khoffi

  • Peer-to-peer communication across network address translators

    Bryan Ford;Pyda Srisuresh;Dan Kegel

  • Parsing expression grammars: a recognition-based syntactic foundation

    Bryan Ford

  • The Flux OSKit: a substrate for kernel and language research

    Bryan Ford;Godmar Back;Greg Benson;Jay Lepreau

  • Scalable Bias-Resistant Distributed Randomness

    Ewa Syta;Philipp Jovanovic;Eleftherios Kokoris Kogias;Nicolas Gailly

  • Keeping Authorities "Honest or Bust" with Decentralized Witness Cosigning

    Ewa Syta;Iulia Tamas;Dylan Visher;David Isaac Wolinsky

  • Packrat parsing: simple, powerful, lazy, linear time, functional pearl

    Bryan Ford

  • Microkernels meet recursive virtual machines

    Bryan Ford;Mike Hibler;Jay Lepreau;Patrick Tullmann

  • Maple: simplifying SDN programming using algorithmic policies

    Andreas Voellmy;Junchang Wang;Y Richard Yang;Bryan Ford

  • Dissent: accountable anonymous group messaging

    Henry Corrigan-Gibbs;Bryan Ford

  • Efficient system-enforced deterministic parallelism

    Amittai Aviram;Shu-Chun Weng;Sen Hu;Bryan Ford

  • Dissent in numbers: making strong anonymity scale

    David Isaac Wolinsky;Henry Corrigan-Gibbs;Bryan Ford;Aaron Johnson

  • CPU inheritance scheduling

    Bryan Ford;Sai Susarla

  • Vx32: lightweight user-level sandboxing on the x86

    Bryan Ford;Russ Cox

  • Evolving mach 3.0 to a migrating thread model

    Bryan Ford;Jay Lepreau

  • Determinating timing channels in compute clouds

    Amittai Aviram;Sen Hu;Bryan Ford;Ramakrishna Gummadi

  • GPUfs: integrating a file system with GPUs

    Mark Silberstein;Bryan Ford;Idit Keidar;Emmett Witchel

  • NAT Behavioral Requirements for TCP

    Pyda Srisuresh;Senthil Sivakumar;Kaushik Biswas;Bryan Ford

  • Design Choices for Central Bank Digital Currency: Policy and Technical Considerations

    Sarah Allen;Srđjan Čapkun;Ittay Eyal;Giulia Fanti

  • Accountable Anonymous Group Messaging

    Henry Corrigan-Gibbs;Bryan Ford

Frequent Co-Authors

Joan Feigenbaum
Joan Feigenbaum Yale University
Michael J. Fischer
Michael J. Fischer Yale University
Jean-Pierre Hubaux
Jean-Pierre Hubaux École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
Emmett Witchel
Emmett Witchel The University of Texas at Austin
Idit Keidar
Idit Keidar Technion – Israel Institute of Technology
Dan Boneh
Dan Boneh Stanford University
Olivier Michielin
Olivier Michielin University of Lausanne

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA opens doors to many online degree options and diverse career pathways. Students interested in combining technology with sustainability can consider an environmental engineering online degree. This program helps learners apply computational skills to real-world environmental challenges.

For those who prefer a focus on design, materials, and robotics, a mechanical engineering degree online cost is an important consideration. Many affordable programs are available, making advanced engineering education more accessible.

If deep scientific analysis and problem-solving are your interests, an online theoretical physics degree offers a strong foundation in both computational modeling and physics theory.

Lastly, the technology job market continues to value data experts, making data science programs a high-demand option for Computer Science students. These related online degrees provide specialized skills that align closely with evolving career opportunities across the tech industry.

Best Scientists Citing Bryan Ford

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles