World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
37
Citations
10471
World Ranking
10485
National Ranking
4387

Matthew Caesar publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthew Caesar sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 118 publications — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Matthew Caesar D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthew Caesar sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Matthew Caesar is affiliated with the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Computer Science and Engineering, with significant contributions in several subfields including Computer Networks and Communications, Information Systems, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, and Aerospace Engineering.

The scientist has worked on a variety of topics, notably:

  • Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs)
  • Advanced Authentication Protocols Security
  • User Authentication and Security Systems
  • Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
  • Video Surveillance and Tracking Methods
  • IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
  • UAV Applications and Optimization

Matthew Caesar has authored multiple papers across diverse venues. Recent works include:

  • "VANET authentication protocols: security analysis and a proposal" (2022) published in The Journal of Supercomputing
  • "Vision-based Behavioral Recognition of Novelty Preference in Pigs" (2021) published in arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "Tracking Grow-Finish Pigs Across Large Pens Using Multiple Cameras" (2021) published in arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "Drone-Hosted Computation for Emergency Response" (2023) published in IEEE Internet of Things Journal
  • "Understanding Misunderstandings: Evaluating LLMs on Networking Questions" (2024) published in ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review

The scientist frequently collaborates with several co-authors, including:

  • Otto B. Piramuthu
  • Aniket Shirke
  • Angela R Green-Miller
  • Ryan N. Dilger
  • Mubashir Anwar

The main venues where their research appears include:

  • ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Proceedings of the 37th ACM/SIGAPP Symposium on Applied Computing
  • The Journal of Supercomputing
  • IEEE Internet of Things Journal

The scientist's work is interdisciplinary, involving both theoretical and applied research. Their contributions to networks and communications emphasize security frameworks for vehicular networks and advanced authentication protocols. Additionally, research in animal behavior and welfare studies incorporates computer vision techniques for behavioral recognition and tracking using multiple cameras.

Matthew Caesar's recent focus on IoT, edge and fog computing integrates with applications such as drone-hosted computation for emergency response. The evaluation of large language models on technical networking questions reflects engagement with emerging AI technologies within the communication domain.

Best Publications

  • VeriFlow: verifying network-wide invariants in real time

    Ahmed Khurshid;Xuan Zou;Wenxuan Zhou;Matthew Caesar

  • Design and implementation of a routing control platform

    Matthew Caesar;Donald Caldwell;Nick Feamster;Jennifer Rexford

  • VeriFlow: verifying network-wide invariants in real time

    Ahmed Khurshid;Wenxuan Zhou;Matthew Caesar;P. Brighten Godfrey

  • Finishing flows quickly with preemptive scheduling

    Chi-Yao Hong;Matthew Caesar;P. Brighten Godfrey

  • Debugging the data plane with anteater

    Haohui Mai;Ahmed Khurshid;Rachit Agarwal;Matthew Caesar

  • The Tangled Web of Password Reuse

    Anupam Das;Joseph Bonneau;Matthew Caesar;Nikita Borisov

  • Virtual ring routing: network routing inspired by DHTs

    Matthew Caesar;Miguel Castro;Edmund B. Nightingale;Greg O'Shea

  • Floodless in seattle: a scalable ethernet architecture for large enterprises

    Changhoon Kim;Matthew Caesar;Jennifer Rexford

  • ROFL: routing on flat labels

    Matthew Caesar;Tyson Condie;Jayanthkumar Kannan;Karthik Lakshminarayanan

  • BGP routing policies in ISP networks

    M. Caesar;J. Rexford

  • BotGrep: finding P2P bots with structured graph analysis

    Shishir Nagaraja;Prateek Mittal;Chi-Yao Hong;Matthew Caesar

  • HLP: a next generation inter-domain routing protocol

    Lakshminarayanan Subramanian;Matthew Caesar;Cheng Tien Ee;Mark Handley

  • Achieving convergence-free routing using failure-carrying packets

    Karthik Lakshminarayanan;Matthew Caesar;Murali Rangan;Tom Anderson

  • Network-Aware Scheduling for Data-Parallel Jobs: Plan When You Can

    Virajith Jalaparti;Peter Bodik;Ishai Menache;Sriram Rao

  • Do You Hear What I Hear?: Fingerprinting Smart Devices Through Embedded Acoustic Components

    Anupam Das;Nikita Borisov;Matthew Caesar

  • Cirripede: circumvention infrastructure using router redirection with plausible deniability

    Amir Houmansadr;Giang T.K. Nguyen;Matthew Caesar;Nikita Borisov

  • The SAHARA Model for Service Composition across Multiple Providers

    Bhaskaran Raman;Sharad Agarwal;Yan Chen;Matthew Caesar

  • Live migration of an entire network (and its hosts)

    Eric Keller;Soudeh Ghorbani;Matt Caesar;Jennifer Rexford

  • Walk the line: consistent network updates with bandwidth guarantees

    Soudeh Ghorbani;Matthew Caesar

  • Tracking Mobile Web Users Through Motion Sensors: Attacks and Defenses.

    Anupam Das;Nikita Borisov;Matthew Caesar

  • SEATTLE: A Scalable Ethernet Architecture for Large Enterprises

    Changhoon Kim;Matthew Caesar;Jennifer Rexford

Frequent Co-Authors

Nikita Borisov
Nikita Borisov University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
P. Brighten Godfrey
P. Brighten Godfrey University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Jennifer Rexford
Jennifer Rexford Princeton University
Prateek Mittal
Prateek Mittal Princeton University
Ion Stoica
Ion Stoica University of California, Berkeley
Scott Shenker
Scott Shenker University of California, Berkeley
Jacobus Van der Merwe
Jacobus Van der Merwe University of Utah
Eric Keller
Eric Keller University of Colorado Boulder
Michael J. Freedman
Michael J. Freedman Princeton University
Thomas Anderson
Thomas Anderson University of Washington

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science in the USA opens doors to a broad spectrum of related online degrees and career options. Many students interested in technology and innovation also consider programs in engineering, data science, and physics to strengthen their skills and expand their career prospects.

For those seeking a cost-effective education, there are options like the cheapest online mechanical engineering degree programs that can lead to roles in design, manufacturing, and product development. If you’re curious about exploring scientific theories and analytical problem-solving, an online physics degree offers a strong foundation for both research and industry careers.

The demand for data professionals is rapidly rising. Pursuing a data scientist degree equips graduates with in-demand skills for sectors like finance, healthcare, and tech. Similarly, online electrical engineering programs have become more accessible. You can review the latest electrical engineering online tuition costs to find affordable routes into careers in electronics, robotics, and telecommunications.

Best Scientists Citing Matthew Caesar

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles