World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Graham Jones

Graham Jones

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 37 9043 8446 908 868 46 9431

Graham Jones publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Graham Jones between 1973 and 2017, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Graham Jones published across 45 years, from 1973 to 2017, averaging 1.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 5 publications in 1995. 1 of the 69 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
1 2 3 4 5
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1973 to 2017. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 5. Peak 5 publications in 1995. 1973: 1 publication 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 1 publication 1978: 1 publication 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 1 publication 1982: 1 publication 1983: 2 publications 1984: 1 publication 1985: 2 publications 1986: 3 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 1 publication 1992: 3 publications 1993: 4 publications 1994: 3 publications 1995: 5 publications 1996: 4 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 1 publication 2002: 5 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 1 publication 2005: 0 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 1 publication 2010: 3 publications 2011: 1 publication 2012: 2 publications 2013: 1 publication 2014: 2 publications 2015: 0 publications 2016: 0 publications 2017: 1 publication
1973 2017

69 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Graham Jones: publications per year, 1973 to 2017
Year Publications
1973 1
1974 0
1975 0
1976 0
1977 1
1978 1
1979 0
1980 0
1981 1
1982 1
1983 2
1984 1
1985 2
1986 3
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 1
1991 1
1992 3
1993 4
1994 3
1995 5
1996 4
1997 3
1998 2
1999 2
2000 1
2001 1
2002 5
2003 1
2004 1
2005 0
2006 3
2007 3
2008 2
2009 1
2010 3
2011 1
2012 2
2013 1
2014 2
2015 0
2016 0
2017 1
Total 69
Download as CSV

Graham Jones publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Graham Jones sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 41–50 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 46 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52 46
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Graham Jones D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Graham Jones sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 36–37 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659 37
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Graham Jones is affiliated with EY Lane4 in the United Kingdom. Their professional focus appears to be oriented towards consulting or related applied fields, as suggested by their primary affiliation, although specific details about their research work, publication records, or academic contributions have not been provided.

There are no recent papers listed under Graham Jones's name, nor are there records of frequent co-authors or notable publication venues associated with their work. This may indicate either a non-academic role or limited publication output accessible through the current data set.

The available data does not include information on book publications or identified fields and subfields of study. Similarly, no main topics of work or awards have been recorded. As such, a detailed mapping of research interests or scholarly impact cannot be established from the given information.

Graham Jones is confirmed to be living, so the profile is presented in the present tense.

Best Publications

  • What Is This Thing Called Mental Toughness? An Investigation of Elite Sport Performers

    Graham Jones;Sheldon Hanton;Declan Connaughton

  • A framework of mental toughness in the world's best performers.

    Graham Jones;Sheldon Hanton;Declan Connaughton

  • The development and maintenance of mental toughness: Perceptions of elite performers

    Declan Connaughton;Ross Wadey;Sheldon Hanton;Graham Jones

  • More than just a game: research developments and issues in competitive anxiety in sport.

    Graham Jones

  • Intensity and interpretation of anxiety symptoms in elite and non-elite sports performers

    Graham Jones;Sheldon Hanton;Austin Swain

  • Intensity and direction dimensions of competitive state anxiety and relationships with performance

    Graham Jones;Austin Swain;Lew Hardy

  • Knowledge and conscious control of motor actions under stress.

    Lew Hardy;Richard Mullen;Graham Jones

  • Intensity and direction as dimensions of competitive state anxiety and relationships with competitiveness.

    Graham Jones;Austin Swain

  • Pre-competitive feeling states and directional anxiety interpretations

    Graham Jones;Sheldon Hanton

  • The acquisition and development of cognitive skills and strategies: I. Making the butterflies fly in formation.

    Sheldon Hanton;Graham Jones

  • The Effects of a Multimodal Intervention Program on Performers: II. Training the Butterflies to Fly in Formation

    Sheldon Hanton;Graham Jones

  • Predispositions to Experience Debilitative and Facilitative Anxiety in Elite and Nonelite Performers

    Graham Jones;Austin Swain

  • Interpretation of Competitive Anxiety Symptoms and Goal Attainment Expectancies

    Graham Jones;Sheldon Hanton

  • The relationship between transformational leadership behaviors, psychological, and training outcomes in elite military recruits☆

    Lew Hardy;Calum A. Arthur;Graham Jones;Adie Shariff

  • Genier Differences in Precompetition Temporal Fattening ami Antecedents of Anxiety and Self-Confidence

    Graham Jones;Austin Swain;Andrew Cale

  • Explaining performance variance: The relative contribution of intensity and direction dimensions of competitive state anxiety

    Austin Swain;Graham Jones

  • Performance Excellence: A Personal Perspective on the Link Between Sport and Business

    Graham Jones

  • The Development and Maintenance of Mental Toughness in the World’s Best Performers

    Declan Connaughton;Sheldon Hanton;Graham Jones

  • Emotional Effects of Sports Injuries: Implications for Physiotherapists

    Lisa Pearson;Graham Jones

  • Emotional Labeling and Competitive Anxiety in Preparation and Competition

    Stephen D. Mellalieu;Sheldon Hanton;Graham Jones

  • Competitive anxiety in sport.

    G. Jones;S. J. H. Biddle

Frequent Co-Authors

Sheldon Hanton
Sheldon Hanton Cardiff Metropolitan University
Lew Hardy
Lew Hardy Bangor University
Stuart J. H. Biddle
Stuart J. H. Biddle University of Southern Queensland
Chris G. Harwood
Chris G. Harwood Loughborough University
Stephen D. Mellalieu
Stephen D. Mellalieu Cardiff Metropolitan University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

When exploring online psychology degrees, affordability and popularity are important considerations. Many students opt for programs that provide strong academic value without high tuition costs. For example, programs like the affordable psychology programs in University Park are appealing for their balance of quality and cost.

Location can also affect your choices. If you’re seeking budget-friendly options in the west, look into the cheapest psychology programs in Utah. Those in the northeast might explore the most affordable psychology degree programs in Vermont. These programs provide flexible pathways for students aiming to enter fields such as counseling, research, or organizational psychology.

Not all students prioritize cost—some prefer programs with a strong reputation and high enrollment. The popular psychology programs in Charlotte are a great example, offering a variety of specializations and active student communities.

Whether your goal is affordability or popularity, researching online psychology degrees can help you identify the right career pathway in this dynamic and impactful field.

Best Scientists Citing Graham Jones

Trending Scientists