World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
64
Citations
15631
World Ranking
2969
National Ranking
316

Andrew M. Lane publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrew M. Lane sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 229 publications — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Andrew M. Lane D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrew M. Lane sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 64 D-Index — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Andrew M. Lane is affiliated with the University of Wolverhampton in the United Kingdom. Their research spans multiple areas primarily within psychology and medicine, with a notable focus on sport-related topics. The main fields of study include psychology and medicine, supported by subfields such as social psychology, clinical psychology, developmental and educational psychology, applied psychology, and orthopedics and sports medicine.

Their work frequently addresses topics related to motivation and self-concept in sports, sport psychology and performance, behavioral health and interventions, sports performance and training, eating disorders and behaviors, physical activity and health, and sports injuries and prevention.

Key research venues where Andrew M. Lane has published multiple works include:

  • Sports
  • Frontiers in Psychology
  • International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology
  • Preprints.org
  • Sci

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Andrew M. Lane feature:

  • Sport psychology and performance meta-analyses: A systematic review of the literature (2022) published in PLoS ONE
  • Revisiting the Self-Confidence and Sport Performance Relationship: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis (2022) published in International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
  • Limits of Ultra: Towards an Interdisciplinary Understanding of Ultra-Endurance Running Performance (2023) published in Sports Medicine
  • Mood Responses and Regulation Strategies Used During COVID-19 Among Boxers and Coaches (2021) published in Frontiers in Psychology
  • Implementing a pressure training program to improve decision-making and execution of skill among premier league academy soccer players (2021) published in Journal of Applied Sport Psychology

Frequent collaborators include:

  • Peter C. Terry
  • Tracey J. Devonport
  • Ross Cloak
  • Samuele Marcora
  • Wendy Nicholls

Andrew M. Lane has also contributed to book publications, including "Essentials of exercise and sport psychology: An open access textbook" published by the Society for Transparency, Openness, and Replication in Kinesiology eBooks in 2021.

Best Publications

  • Construct validity of the Profile of Mood States — Adolescents for use with adults

    Peter C. Terry;Andrew M. Lane;Gerard J. Fogarty

  • Distinctions between emotion and mood

    Christopher J. Beedie;Peter C. Terry;Andrew M. Lane

  • Self-Efficacy, Self-Esteem and Their Impact on Academic Performance

    John Lane;Andrew M. Lane;Anna Kyprianou

  • Development and validation of a mood measure for adolescents.

    Peter C. Terry;Andrew M. Lane;Helen J. Lane;Lee Keohane

  • The profile of mood states and athletic performance: Two meta-analyses

    Christopher J. Beedie;Peter C. Terry;Andrew M. Lane

  • The Nature of Mood: Development of a Conceptual Model with a Focus on Depression

    Andrew M. Lane;Peter C. Terry

  • Development and Validation of the Sport Emotion Questionnaire

    Marc V. Jones;Andrew M. Lane;Steven R. Bray;Mark Uphill

  • Development and initial validation of an instrument to assess the motivational qualities of music in exercise and sport: The Brunel Music Rating Inventory

    Costas I. Karageorghis;Peter C. Terry;Andrew M. Lane

  • Self-efficacy and academic performance

    John Lane;Andrew M. Lane

  • The Role of Glucose in Self-Control Another Look at the Evidence and an Alternative Conceptualization

    Christopher J. Beedie;Andrew M. Lane

  • Examining relationships between emotional intelligence and coaching efficacy.

    Richard C. Thelwell;Andrew M. Lane;Neil J.V. Weston;Iain A. Greenlees

  • Effects of rapid weight loss on mood and performance among amateur boxers.

    C J Hall;Andrew M. Lane

  • Emotional intelligence and psychological skills use among athletes

    Andrew M. Lane;Richard C. Thelwell;James Lowther;Tracey J. Devonport

  • RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN SELF-EFFICACY, COPING AND STUDENT RETENTION

    Tracey J. Devonport;Andrew M. Lane

  • Redesign and initial validation of an instrument to assess the motivational qualities of music in exercise: The Brunel Music Rating Inventory-2

    Costas I. Karageorghis;David Lee Priest;Peter C. Terry;Nikos L. D. Chatzisarantis

  • Normative values for the profile of mood states for use with athletic samples

    Peter C. Terry;Andrew M. Lane

  • The effects of exercise on mood changes: the moderating effect of depressed mood

    A M Lane;D J Lovejoy

  • Validity and Reliability of a Brief Emotional Intelligence Scale (BEIS-10)

    Kevin A. Davies;Andrew M. Lane;Tracey J. Devonport;Jamie A. Scott

  • Using on-line video clips to enhance self-efficacy toward dealing with difficult situations among nursing students

    Sally A. McConville;Andrew M. Lane

  • Coping with failure: the effects of self-esteem and coping on changes in self-efficacy.

    A. M. Lane;L. Jones;M. J. Stevens

  • Sport Emotion Questionnaire / 407 407 Development and Validation of the Sport Emotion Questionnaire

    Marc V. Jones;Andrew M. Lane;Steven R. Bray;Mark Uphill

Frequent Co-Authors

Peter C. Terry
Peter C. Terry University of Southern Queensland
Costas I. Karageorghis
Costas I. Karageorghis Brunel University London
Marc V. Jones
Marc V. Jones Manchester Metropolitan University
Richard C. Thelwell
Richard C. Thelwell University of Portsmouth
Robert J. Schinke
Robert J. Schinke Laurentian University
Yiannis Koutedakis
Yiannis Koutedakis University Of Thessaly
John S. Raglin
John S. Raglin Indiana University
Gershon Tenenbaum
Gershon Tenenbaum Reichman University
Steven R. Bray
Steven R. Bray McMaster University
Ronnie Lidor
Ronnie Lidor Wingate Institute

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology can open doors to various online degree programs and rewarding career pathways—including social work. Many states in the U.S. have specific educational requirements for those seeking to become social workers, making it important to understand your options before enrolling.

For example, the Maryland education requirements for social workers emphasize the need for at least a bachelor’s degree in social work or a related field. Similarly, the Massachusetts minimum degree requirement for social workers also outlines a bachelor’s degree as an entry point, with advanced positions typically requiring a master’s.

Requirements can vary depending on the state. For instance, the degree needed to be a social worker in Michigan and the Minnesota minimum degree requirement for social workers both highlight the importance of accredited degrees, especially for those aiming for clinical or specialized roles.

Online psychology and social work programs offer flexibility for working professionals or those balancing other commitments, making it easier to meet these state-specific requirements and move forward in your chosen career.

Best Scientists Citing Andrew M. Lane

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles