World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
31
Citations
4163
World Ranking
11183
National Ranking
1085

Jamie M. Poolton publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jamie M. Poolton sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 103 publications — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Jamie M. Poolton D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jamie M. Poolton sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 31 D-Index — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Development and Validation of a Surgical Workload Measure: The Surgery Task Load Index (SURG-TLX)

    Mark R. Wilson;Jamie M. Poolton;Neha Malhotra;Karen Ngo

  • Benefits of an external focus of attention: common coding or conscious processing?

    J. M. Poolton;J. P. Maxwell;R. S. W. Masters;M. Raab

  • The relationship between initial errorless learning conditions and subsequent performance.

    J.M. Poolton;R.S.W. Masters;J.P. Maxwell

  • Implicit Motor Learning and Complex Decision Making in Time-Constrained Environments

    R. S. W. Masters;J. M. Poolton;J. P. Maxwell;M. Raab

  • The influence of analogy learning on decision-making in table tennis: Evidence from behavioural data

    J.M. Poolton;R.S.W. Masters;J.P. Maxwell

  • Neural co-activation as a yardstick of implicit motor learning and the propensity for conscious control of movement.

    F F Zhu;Jamie M Poolton;Mark R Wilson;Mark R Wilson;J P Maxwell

  • Passing thoughts on the evolutionary stability of implicit motor behaviour: performance retention under physiological fatigue.

    J.M. Poolton;R.S.W. Masters;J.P. Maxwell

  • Stable implicit motor processes despite aerobic locomotor fatigue.

    R.S.W. Masters;J.M. Poolton;J.P. Maxwell

  • Cathodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Over Left Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex Area Promotes Implicit Motor Learning in a Golf Putting Task.

    Frank F. Zhu;Andrew Y. Yeung;Jamie M. Poolton;Tatia M.C. Lee

  • The role of central and peripheral vision in expert decision-making

    Donghyun Ryu;Bruce Abernethy;David L Mann;Jamie M Poolton

  • Reducing errors benefits the field-based learning of a fundamental movement skill in children

    C. M. Capio;J. M. Poolton;C. H. P. Sit;M. Holmstrom

  • Reduction of Errors during Practice Facilitates Fundamental Movement Skill Learning in Children with Intellectual Disabilities.

    Catherine Mamaid Capio;Catherine Mamaid Capio;J. M. Poolton;C. H. P. Sit;C. H. P. Sit;K. F. Eguia

  • Performance breakdown in sport: the roles of reinvestment and verbal knowledge.

    J. P. Maxwell;R. S. W. Masters;J. M. Poolton

  • Implicit motor learning promotes neural efficiency during laparoscopy.

    Frank F. Zhu;Jamie M. Poolton;Mark R. Wilson;Yong Hu

  • Understanding a Player's Decision-Making Process in Team Sports: A Systematic Review of Empirical Evidence.

    Michael Ashford;Andrew Abraham;Jamie Poolton

  • Attention and time constraints in perceptual-motor learning and performance: Instruction, analogy, and skill level

    Johan M. Koedijker;Jamie M. Poolton;Jonathan P. Maxwell;Raôul R.D. Oudejans

  • Conscious monitoring and control (reinvestment) in surgical performance under pressure.

    Neha Malhotra;Jamie M. Poolton;Mark R. Wilson;Karen Ngo

  • EEG activity during the verbal-cognitive stage of motor skill acquisition.

    F.F. Zhu;J.P. Maxwell;Y. Hu;Z.G. Zhang

  • The Development of a Culturally Appropriate Analogy for Implicit Motor Learning in a Chinese Population

    Jamie M. Poolton;Richard S.W. Masters;Jon P. Maxwell

  • A comparison of evaluation, time pressure, and multitasking as stressors of psychomotor operative performance.

    Jamie M. Poolton;Mark R. Wilson;Mark R. Wilson;Neha Malhotra;Karen Ngo

Frequent Co-Authors

Rich S. W. Masters
Rich S. W. Masters University of Waikato
Mark R. Wilson
Mark R. Wilson University of Wollongong
Bruce Abernethy
Bruce Abernethy University of Queensland
Markus Raab
Markus Raab German Sport University Cologne
John van der Kamp
John van der Kamp Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Cindy H.P. Sit
Cindy H.P. Sit Chinese University of Hong Kong
Yong Hu
Yong Hu University of Hong Kong
Tatia M.C. Lee
Tatia M.C. Lee University of Hong Kong
Raôul R. D. Oudejans
Raôul R. D. Oudejans Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Michael F. Burrow
Michael F. Burrow University of Melbourne

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Jamie M. Poolton

Recently Published Articles