World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
48
Citations
10352
World Ranking
3125
National Ranking
128

Anna Beurskens publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anna Beurskens sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 173 publications — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Anna Beurskens D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anna Beurskens sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Anna Beurskens is affiliated with Maastricht University in the Netherlands and contributes to research primarily in the fields of Health Professions and Medicine. Their work spans various subfields including General Health Professions, Psychiatry and Mental Health, Clinical Psychology, Rehabilitation, and Economics and Econometrics.

Their research topics cover a range of areas such as Mental Health and Patient Involvement, Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders, Family and Disability Support Research, Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare, Interprofessional Education and Collaboration, Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery, and Autism Spectrum Disorder Research.

Anna Beurskens has published several papers in notable venues. Recent publications include:

  • How to support a co-creative research approach in order to foster impact. The development of a Co-creation Impact Compass for healthcare researchers, 2020, PLoS ONE
  • Stakeholder engagement from problem analysis to implementation strategies for a patient-reported experience measure in disability care: A qualitative study on the process and experiences, 2020, Health Expectations
  • Implicit and Explicit Motor Learning Interventions Have Similar Effects on Walking Speed in People After Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial, 2021, Physical Therapy
  • Development of a standard set of PROs and generic PROMs for Dutch medical specialist care, 2023, Quality of Life Research
  • Cross-cultural adaptation of the Participation and Environment Measure for Children and Youth (PEM-CY) into German: a qualitative study in three countries, 2020, BMC Pediatrics

Frequent publication venues for their work include Health Expectations, Quality of Life Research, Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, PLoS ONE, and Physical Therapy.

Collaboration is a component of their research activity, with frequent co-authors being:

  • Albine Moser
  • Marjolein van Rooijen
  • Stephanie Anna Lenzen
  • Ruth Dalemans
  • Susy Braun

Best Publications

  • Responsiveness of functional status in low back pain: A comparison of different instruments.

    A. J.H.M. Beurskens;H. C.W. De Vet;A. J.A. Köke

  • Fatigue among working people: validity of a questionnaire measure.

    Anna J H M Beurskens;Ute Bültmann;IJmert Kant;Jan H M M Vercoulen

  • Fatigue and psychological distress in the working population: Psychometrics, prevalence, and correlates

    Ute Bültmann;Ijmert Kant;Stanislav V Kasl;Anna J.H.M Beurskens

  • Measuring the functional status of patients with low back pain. Assessment of the quality of four disease-specific questionnaires.

    A J Beurskens;H C de Vet;A J Köke;G J van der Heijden

  • The effects of mental practice in stroke rehabilitation: a systematic review.

    Susy M. Braun;Anna J. Beurskens;Paul J. Borm;Thomas Schack

  • Participation and social participation: are they distinct concepts?

    Barbara Piškur;Ramon Daniëls;Marian J Jongmans;Marjolijn Ketelaar

  • An epidemiological approach to study fatigue in the working population: the Maastricht Cohort Study.

    IJ Kant;U Bültmann;K A P Schröer;A J H M Beurskens

  • Measurement of prolonged fatigue in the working population: determination of a cutoff point for the checklist individual strength.

    Ute Bültmann;Maaike de Vries;Anna J. H. M. Beurskens;Gijs Bleijenberg

  • The clinical aspects of mirror therapy in rehabilitation: a systematic review of the literature.

    Andreas Stefan Rothgangel;Susy M. Braun;Anna J. H. M. Beurskens;Ruediger J. Seitz

  • A patient-specific approach for measuring functional status in low back pain.

    Anna J. Beurskens;Henrica C. de Vet;Albére J. Kökeb;Eline Lindeman

  • Reproducibility and responsiveness of evaluative outcome measures : Theoretical considerations illustrated by an empirical example

    Henrica C.W. De Vet;Lex M. Bouter;P. Dick Bezemer;Anna J.H.M. Beurskens

  • Current use and barriers and facilitators for implementation of standardised measures in physical therapy in the Netherlands

    Raymond A H M Swinkels;Roland P S van Peppen;Harriet Wittink;Jan W H Custers

  • Using a Delphi Technique to Seek Consensus Regarding Definitions, Descriptions and Classification of Terms Related to Implicit and Explicit Forms of Motor Learning

    Melanie Kleynen;Susy M. Braun;Michel H. Bleijlevens;Monique A. Lexis

  • Fried phenotype of frailty: cross-sectional comparison of three frailty stages on various health domains

    Linda P. M. Op het Veld;Linda P. M. Op het Veld;Erik van Rossum;Erik van Rossum;Gertrudis I. J. M. Kempen;Henrica C. W. de Vet

  • The effects of mental practice in neurological rehabilitation; a systematic review and meta-analysis

    Susy Braun;Susy Braun;Melanie Kleynen;Tessa van Heel;Nena Kruithof

  • An investigation into the social participation of stroke survivors with aphasia.

    Ruth J P Dalemans;Luc P De Witte;Anna J H M Beurskens;Wim J A Van Den Heuvel

  • Anxiety and depression in the working population using the HAD Scale--psychometrics, prevalence and relationships with psychosocial work characteristics.

    H. Andrea;U. Bültmann;U. Bültmann;A. J. H. M. Beurskens;G. M. H. Swaen

  • The predictive validity of three self-report screening instruments for identifying frail older people in the community.

    Ramon Daniels;Erik van Rossum;Erik van Rossum;Anna Beurskens;Anna Beurskens;Wim van den Heuvel;Wim van den Heuvel

  • The use of patient-specific measurement instruments in the process of goal-setting: a systematic review of available instruments and their feasibility

    Anita Stevens;Anna Beurskens;Anna Beurskens;Albère Köke;Albère Köke;Trudy van der Weijden

  • Health problems and psychosocial work environment as predictors of long term sickness absence in employees who visited the occupational physician and/or general practitioner in relation to work: a prospective study

    H Andrea;A J H M Beurskens;J F M Metsemakers;L G P M van Amelsvoort

  • Interprofessional collaboration regarding patients' care plans in primary care: a focus group study into influential factors

    Jerôme Jean Jacques van Dongen;Jerôme Jean Jacques van Dongen;Stephanie Anna Lenzen;Stephanie Anna Lenzen;Marloes Amantia van Bokhoven;Ramon Daniëls

  • Efficacy of cognitive-behavioural therapy by general practitioners for unexplained fatigue among employees: Randomised controlled trial.

    M.J.H. Huibers;A.J.H.M. Beurskens;C.P. van Schayck;E. Bazelmans

Frequent Co-Authors

Derick T Wade
Derick T Wade Oxford Brookes University
Luc P. de Witte
Luc P. de Witte University of Sheffield
Gijs Bleijenberg
Gijs Bleijenberg Radboud University
Marcus J.H. Huibers
Marcus J.H. Huibers Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Gertrudis I. J. M. Kempen
Gertrudis I. J. M. Kempen Maastricht University
Rich S. W. Masters
Rich S. W. Masters University of Waikato
Henrica C.W. de Vet
Henrica C.W. de Vet University of Amsterdam
Marian J. Jongmans
Marian J. Jongmans Utrecht University
Thomas Schack
Thomas Schack Bielefeld University
Mark R. Wilson
Mark R. Wilson University of Wollongong

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens the door to a variety of online degree options and rewarding career pathways. If you want to advance quickly, consider enrolling in one of the online master's degree programs, which are designed to be completed in as little as a year. For those aiming to start their academic journey, online bachelor's degree programs in fields like psychology, sociology, and communications offer flexibility without sacrificing quality.

Cost is another important factor for many students. If you're interested in social work, you can find some of the cheapest online msw programs that make it possible to advance your education affordably. Those focusing on applied behavioral analysis can also take advantage of bcba school online options, helping you qualify for in-demand roles in therapy and education. No matter your path, these flexible online programs can help you gain relevant skills, grow your network, and achieve your career goals in the social sciences and humanities.

Best Scientists Citing Anna Beurskens

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles