World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Alberto Rodriguez

Alberto Rodriguez

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
43
Citations
8739
World Ranking
7920
National Ranking
3415

Alberto Rodriguez publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alberto Rodriguez sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 118 publications — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Alberto Rodriguez D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alberto Rodriguez sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Alberto Rodriguez is a researcher affiliated with MIT in the United States, contributing extensively to the fields of engineering and computer science. Their work spans multiple subfields, including control and systems engineering, computer vision and pattern recognition, biomedical engineering, cognitive neuroscience, and artificial intelligence.

The core focus of their research lies in robotics, with a strong emphasis on robot manipulation and learning. Other significant areas of study include tactile and sensory interactions, soft robotics and applications, robotic mechanisms and dynamics, robotic path planning algorithms, human pose and action recognition, and hand gesture recognition systems.

Recent publications demonstrate the scope and diversity of their research interests. Notable papers include:

  • iNeRF: Inverting Neural Radiance Fields for Pose Estimation, 2021, presented at the 2021 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS)
  • TossingBot: Learning to Throw Arbitrary Objects With Residual Physics, 2020, published in IEEE Transactions on Robotics
  • Cable manipulation with a tactile-reactive gripper, 2021, featured in The International Journal of Robotics Research
  • GelSlim 3.0: High-Resolution Measurement of Shape, Force and Slip in a Compact Tactile-Sensing Finger, 2022, presented at the 2022 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA)
  • On the use of simulation in robotics: Opportunities, challenges, and suggestions for moving forward, 2020, published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Their frequent coauthors include Maria Bauzá, Siyuan Dong, Antonia Bronars, Sangwoon Kim, and Ian Taylor, reflecting ongoing collaborative efforts within the robotics community.

Alberto Rodriguez's research appears regularly in a diverse set of venues, notably arXiv, where they have 13 publications. Other frequent publication venues include The International Journal of Robotics Research with 5 papers, the 2022 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) with 4 papers, Science Robotics with 2 papers, and the 2022 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) with 2 papers.

Their body of work integrates practical and theoretical aspects of robotics, addressing challenges related to manipulation, sensory feedback, and learning algorithms. This integration supports advances in both hardware capabilities and control strategies in robotic systems.

Best Publications

  • Analysis and Observations From the First Amazon Picking Challenge

    Nikolaus Correll;Kostas E. Bekris;Dmitry Berenson;Oliver Brock

  • Learning Synergies Between Pushing and Grasping with Self-Supervised Deep Reinforcement Learning

    Andy Zeng;Shuran Song;Stefan Welker;Johnny Lee

  • Robotic Pick-and-Place of Novel Objects in Clutter with Multi-Affordance Grasping and Cross-Domain Image Matching

    Andy Zeng;Shuran Song;Kuan-Ting Yu;Elliott Donlon

  • Robotic pick-and-place of novel objects in clutter with multi-affordance grasping and cross-domain image matching:

    Andy Zeng;Shuran Song;Kuan-Ting Yu;Elliott Donlon

  • Multi-view self-supervised deep learning for 6D pose estimation in the Amazon Picking Challenge

    Andy Zeng;Kuan-Ting Yu;Shuran Song;Daniel Suo

  • TossingBot: Learning to Throw Arbitrary Objects With Residual Physics

    Andy Zeng;Shuran Song;Johnny Lee;Alberto Rodriguez

  • iNeRF: Inverting Neural Radiance Fields for Pose Estimation

    Lin Yen-Chen;Pete Florence;Jonathan T. Barron;Alberto Rodriguez

  • Extrinsic dexterity: In-hand manipulation with external forces

    Nikhil Chavan Dafle;Alberto Rodriguez;Robert Paolini;Bowei Tang

  • From caging to grasping

    Alberto Rodriguez;Matthew T Mason;Steve Ferry

  • GelSlim: A High-Resolution, Compact, Robust, and Calibrated Tactile-sensing Finger

    Elliott Donlon;Siyuan Dong;Melody Liu;Jianhua Li

  • Neural Descriptor Fields: SE(3)-Equivariant Object Representations for Manipulation

    Unknown

  • Cable manipulation with a tactile-reactive gripper:

    Yu She;Shaoxiong Wang;Siyuan Dong;Neha Sunil

  • GelSlim3.0: High-Resolution Measurement of Shape, Force and Slip in a Compact Tactile-Sensing Finger.

    Ian Taylor;Siyuan Dong;Alberto Rodriguez

  • More than a million ways to be pushed. A high-fidelity experimental dataset of planar pushing

    Kuan-Ting Yu;Maria Bauza;Nima Fazeli;Alberto Rodriguez

  • Dense Tactile Force Estimation using GelSlim and inverse FEM

    Daolin Ma;Elliott Donlon;Siyuan Dong;Alberto Rodriguez

  • On the use of simulation in robotics: Opportunities, challenges, and suggestions for moving forward.

    Hee Sun Choi;Cindy Crump;Christian Duriez;Asher Elmquist

  • See, feel, act: Hierarchical learning for complex manipulation skills with multisensory fusion

    N. Fazeli;M. Oller;J. Wu;Z. Wu

  • Prehensile pushing: In-hand manipulation with push-primitives

    Nikhil Chavan-Dafle;Alberto Rodriguez

  • Augmenting Physical Simulators with Stochastic Neural Networks: Case Study of Planar Pushing and Bouncing

    Anurag Ajay;Jiajun Wu;Nima Fazeli;Maria Bauza

  • Tactile Regrasp: Grasp Adjustments via Simulated Tactile Transformations

    Francois R. Hogan;Maria Bauza;Oleguer Canal;Elliott Donlon

  • A probabilistic data-driven model for planar pushing

    Maria Bauza;Alberto Rodriguez

  • Tactile-RL for Insertion: Generalization to Objects of Unknown Geometry

    Siyuan Dong;Devesh K. Jha;Diego Romeres;Sangwoon Kim

  • Dense Tactile Force Distribution Estimation using GelSlim and inverse FEM.

    Daolin Ma;Elliott Donlon;Siyuan Dong;Alberto Rodriguez

Frequent Co-Authors

Matthew T. Mason
Matthew T. Mason Carnegie Mellon University
Shuran Song
Shuran Song Stanford University
Thomas Funkhouser
Thomas Funkhouser Google (United States)
Siddhartha S. Srinivasa
Siddhartha S. Srinivasa University of Washington
Jiajun Wu
Jiajun Wu Stanford University
Oliver Brock
Oliver Brock Technical University of Berlin

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online education in the U.S. opens up flexible and affordable options for aspiring Computer Science students. There are various cheap online degrees fast that can accelerate your path to graduation without a heavy financial burden. These programs are ideal for learners who want to quickly enter tech fields while managing costs.

Admission flexibility is another advantage. Some universities for low gpa allow students with diverse academic backgrounds to enroll in computer science or related programs online. This inclusivity creates opportunities for more students to advance their education.

Beyond computer science, tech skills can also cross over into other fields. For instance, graduates can pursue high-paying jobs with environmental science degree credentials by combining computing expertise with environmental applications.

For maximum flexibility and speed, check out the best options for a computer science degree online. These programs can help you jump-start your tech career or pivot to exciting new roles with in-demand skills.

Best Scientists Citing Alberto Rodriguez

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles