World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
35
Citations
7173
World Ranking
11514
National Ranking
4731

Jeannette Bohg publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jeannette Bohg sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 174 publications — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Jeannette Bohg D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jeannette Bohg sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jeannette Bohg is affiliated with Stanford University in the United States. Their research work primarily spans the fields of Computer Science and Engineering, with significant contributions to subfields such as Control and Systems Engineering, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Artificial Intelligence, Biomedical Engineering, and Cognitive Neuroscience.

The main topics Jeannette Bohg focuses on in their research include:

  • Robot Manipulation and Learning
  • Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
  • Human Pose and Action Recognition
  • Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Robotic Path Planning Algorithms
  • Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning

Jeannette Bohg has published extensively, with frequent appearances in venues such as:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters
  • Autonomous Robots
  • IEEE Transactions on Robotics
  • 2022 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS)

Some of their recent papers are:

  • On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Models, 2021, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Deep Learning Approaches to Grasp Synthesis: A Review, 2023, IEEE Transactions on Robotics
  • Text2Motion: from natural language instructions to feasible plans, 2023, Autonomous Robots
  • TidyBot: personalized robot assistance with large language models, 2023, Autonomous Robots
  • Self-Supervised Learning of State Estimation for Manipulating Deformable Linear Objects, 2020, IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Jeannette Bohg include:

  • Dorsa Sadigh
  • Rika Antonova
  • Toki Migimatsu
  • Priya Sundaresan
  • Christopher Agia

Best Publications

  • On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Models.

    Rishi Bommasani;Drew A. Hudson;Ehsan Adeli;Russ Altman

  • Data-Driven Grasp Synthesis—A Survey

    Jeannette Bohg;Antonio Morales;Tamim Asfour;Danica Kragic

  • Interactive Perception: Leveraging Action in Perception and Perception in Action

    Jeannette Bohg;Karol Hausman;Bharath Sankaran;Oliver Brock

  • Making Sense of Vision and Touch: Self-Supervised Learning of Multimodal Representations for Contact-Rich Tasks

    Michelle A. Lee;Yuke Zhu;Krishnan Srinivasan;Parth Shah

  • Leveraging big data for grasp planning

    Daniel Kappler;Jeannette Bohg;Stefan Schaal

  • Text2Motion: from natural language instructions to feasible plans

    Unknown

  • TidyBot: Personalized Robot Assistance with Large Language Models

    Unknown

  • MeteorNet: Deep Learning on Dynamic 3D Point Cloud Sequences

    Xingyu Liu;Mengyuan Yan;Jeannette Bohg

  • Making Sense of Vision and Touch: Learning Multimodal Representations for Contact-Rich Tasks

    Michelle A. Lee;Yuke Zhu;Peter Zachares;Matthew Tan

  • Learning grasping points with shape context

    Jeannette Bohg;Danica Kragic

  • Self-Supervised Learning of State Estimation for Manipulating Deformable Linear Objects

    Mengyuan Yan;Yilin Zhu;Ning Jin;Jeannette Bohg

  • OpenGRASP: a toolkit for robot grasping simulation

    Beatriz León;Stefan Ulbrich;Rosen Diankov;Gustavo Puche

  • Variable Impedance Control in End-Effector Space: An Action Space for Reinforcement Learning in Contact-Rich Tasks

    Roberto Martin-Martin;Michelle A. Lee;Rachel Gardner;Silvio Savarese

  • Learning of grasp selection based on shape-templates

    Alexander Herzog;Peter Pastor;Mrinal Kalakrishnan;Ludovic Righetti

  • Automatic LQR tuning based on Gaussian process global optimization

    Alonso Marco;Philipp Hennig;Jeannette Bohg;Stefan Schaal

  • Mind the gap - robotic grasping under incomplete observation

    Jeannette Bohg;Matthew Johnson-Roberson;Beatriz Leon;Javier Felip

  • Concept2Robot: Learning manipulation concepts from instructions and human demonstrations:

    Lin Shao;Toki Migimatsu;Qiang Zhang;Karen Yang

  • Open X-Embodiment: Robotic Learning Datasets and RT-X Models

    Unknown

  • Probabilistic 3D Multi-Modal, Multi-Object Tracking for Autonomous Driving

    Hsu-Kuang Chiu;Jie Li;Rares Ambrus;Jeannette Bohg

  • Open X-Embodiment: Robotic Learning Datasets and RT-X Models : Open X-Embodiment Collaboration0

    Unknown

  • Real-Time Perception Meets Reactive Motion Generation

    Daniel Kappler;Franziska Meier;Jan Issac;Jim Mainprice

  • ObjectFolder 2.0: A Multisensory Object Dataset for Sim2Real Transfer

    Unknown

  • Probabilistic object tracking using a range camera

    Manuel Wuthrich;Peter Pastor;Mrinal Kalakrishnan;Jeannette Bohg

  • DROID: A Large-Scale In-The-Wild Robot Manipulation Dataset

    Unknown

  • DROID: A Large-Scale In-The-Wild Robot Manipulation Dataset

    Unknown

  • Probabilistic Articulated Real-Time Tracking for Robot Manipulation

    Cristina Garcia Cifuentes;Jan Issac;Manuel Wüthrich;Stefan Schaal

  • Combining learned and analytical models for predicting action effects.

    Alina Kloss;Stefan Schaal;Jeannette Bohg

  • UniGrasp: Learning a Unified Model to Grasp with Multifingered Robotic Hands

    Lin Shao;Fabio Ferreira;Mikael Jorda;Varun Nambiar

  • Probabilistic 3D Multi-Object Tracking for Autonomous Driving.

    Hsu-Kuang Chiu;Antonio Prioletti;Jie Li;Jeannette Bohg

Frequent Co-Authors

Stefan Schaal
Stefan Schaal Google (United States)
Danica Kragic
Danica Kragic Royal Institute of Technology
Lin Shao
Lin Shao Texas A&M University
Dorsa Sadigh
Dorsa Sadigh Stanford University
Silvio Savarese
Silvio Savarese Stanford University
Animesh Garg
Animesh Garg University of Toronto
Tamim Asfour
Tamim Asfour Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
Yuke Zhu
Yuke Zhu The University of Texas at Austin
Ludovic Righetti
Ludovic Righetti New York University
Li Fei-Fei
Li Fei-Fei Stanford University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA opens many alternative education options. Students looking for flexibility and affordability should consider online associate degree programs. These two-year courses often serve as gateways to entry-level tech roles or as stepping stones towards a bachelor’s degree.

For those seeking advanced expertise, choosing the quickest cheapest masters degree can accelerate career advancement and minimize tuition expenses. Many reputable universities now provide accelerated and affordable master's programs in high-demand fields like IT, cybersecurity, and data science.

It’s important to select from the most useful graduate degrees that align with your goals. Master’s degrees in computer science or related fields remain highly desirable among top employers and can unlock specialized roles with higher salaries.

When cost is a key concern, researching the cheapest online college options can significantly reduce student debt. Many accredited institutions now offer quality computer science degrees fully online—blending savings with flexibility.

Best Scientists Citing Jeannette Bohg

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles