World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 41 8729 8480 3736 3588 236 8474

Dorsa Sadigh publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Dorsa Sadigh between 2011 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Dorsa Sadigh published across 15 years, from 2011 to 2025, averaging 18.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 47 publications in 2021. 74 of the 273 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2011 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 47. Peak 47 publications in 2021. 2011: 2 publications 2012: 1 publication 2013: 2 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 3 publications 2016: 13 publications 2017: 3 publications 2018: 10 publications 2019: 22 publications 2020: 23 publications 2021: 47 publications 2022: 22 publications 2023: 44 publications 2024: 42 publications 2025: 32 publications
2011 2025

273 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Dorsa Sadigh: publications per year, 2011 to 2025
Year Publications
2011 2
2012 1
2013 2
2014 7
2015 3
2016 13
2017 3
2018 10
2019 22
2020 23
2021 47
2022 22
2023 44
2024 42
2025 32
Total 273
Download as CSV

Dorsa Sadigh publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dorsa Sadigh sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 232–241 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 236 publications — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421
102–111 420
112–121 497
122–131 544
132–141 555
142–151 609
152–161 559
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583
192–201 519
202–211 508
212–221 490
222–231 437
232–241 423 236
242–251 408
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335
282–291 320
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

Dorsa Sadigh D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dorsa Sadigh sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 40–41 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983
34–35 918
36–37 990
38–39 968
40–41 907 41
42–43 821
44–45 763
46–47 689
48–49 543
50–51 543
52–53 518
54–55 500
56–57 458
58–59 400
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Dorsa Sadigh is a researcher affiliated with Stanford University in the United States, specializing in fields spanning Computer Science and Engineering. Their work primarily focuses on subfields such as Artificial Intelligence, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Control and Systems Engineering, Automotive Engineering, and Social Psychology.

The researcher's publications cover a range of topics including Reinforcement Learning in Robotics, Robot Manipulation and Learning, Multimodal Machine Learning Applications, Topic Modeling, Human Pose and Action Recognition, Traffic Control and Management, and Natural Language Processing Techniques.

Frequent publication venues for their work include:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters
  • 2022 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA)
  • The International Journal of Robotics Research
  • Autonomous Robots

Among recent papers associated with this researcher are:

  • "On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Models" (2021), arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "Toward verified artificial intelligence" (2022), Communications of the ACM
  • "Open X-Embodiment: Robotic Learning Datasets and RT-X Models" (2023), arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "Open Problems and Fundamental Limitations of Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback" (2023), arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "Social Coordination and Altruism in Autonomous Driving" (2022), IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems

Collaborations have been frequent with several co-authors, including:

  • Erdem Bıyık
  • Chelsea Finn
  • Jeannette Bohg
  • Suneel Belkhale
  • Siddharth Karamcheti

Best Publications

  • On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Models.

    Rishi Bommasani;Drew A. Hudson;Ehsan Adeli;Russ Altman

  • Planning for Autonomous Cars that Leverage Effects on Human Actions

    Dorsa Sadigh;Shankar Sastry;Sanjit A. Seshia;Anca D. Dragan

  • Reactive synthesis from signal temporal logic specifications

    Vasumathi Raman;Alexandre Donzé;Dorsa Sadigh;Richard M. Murray

  • Active preference-based learning of reward functions

    Dorsa Sadigh;Anca D. Dragan;Shankar Sastry;Sanjit A. Seshia

  • Information gathering actions over human internal state

    Dorsa Sadigh;S. Shankar Sastry;Sanjit A. Seshia;Anca Dragan

  • Hierarchical Game-Theoretic Planning for Autonomous Vehicles

    Jaime F. Fisac;Eli Bronstein;Elis Stefansson;Dorsa Sadigh

  • Planning for cars that coordinate with people: leveraging effects on human actions for planning and active information gathering over human internal state

    Dorsa Sadigh;Nick Landolfi;Shankar S. Sastry;Sanjit A. Seshia

  • A learning based approach to control synthesis of Markov decision processes for linear temporal logic specifications

    Dorsa Sadigh;Eric S. Kim;Samuel Coogan;S. Shankar Sastry

  • Toward verified artificial intelligence

    Unknown

  • Open Problems and Fundamental Limitations of Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback

    Unknown

  • Safe Control under Uncertainty with Probabilistic Signal Temporal Logic.

    Dorsa Sadigh;Ashish Kapoor

  • OpenVLA: An Open-Source Vision-Language-Action Model

    Unknown

  • Towards Verified Artificial Intelligence

    Sanjit A. Seshia;Dorsa Sadigh

  • Multi-Agent Generative Adversarial Imitation Learning

    Jiaming Song;Hongyu Ren;Dorsa Sadigh;Stefano Ermon

  • Synthesis for Human-in-the-Loop Control Systems

    Wenchao Li;Dorsa Sadigh;S. Shankar Sastry;Sanjit A. Seshia

  • Open X-Embodiment: Robotic Learning Datasets and RT-X Models

    Unknown

  • Open X-Embodiment: Robotic Learning Datasets and RT-X Models : Open X-Embodiment Collaboration0

    Unknown

  • SpatialVLM: Endowing Vision-Language Models with Spatial Reasoning Capabilities

    Unknown

  • Automating exercise generation: a step towards meeting the MOOC challenge for embedded systems

    Dorsa Sadigh;Sanjit A. Seshia;Mona Gupta

  • Data-Driven Probabilistic Modeling and Verification of Human Driver Behavior

    Dorsa Sadigh;Katherine Rose Driggs-Campbell;Alberto Puggelli;Wenchao Li

  • Learning Reward Functions by Integrating Human Demonstrations and Preferences

    Malayandi Palan;Gleb Shevchuk;Nicholas Charles Landolfi;Dorsa Sadigh

  • Efficient and Trustworthy Social Navigation via Explicit and Implicit Robot–Human Communication

    Yuhang Che;Allison M. Okamura;Dorsa Sadigh

  • Multi-Agent Generative Adversarial Imitation Learning

    Jiaming Song;Hongyu Ren;Dorsa Sadigh;Stefano Ermon

  • Dynamic multi-robot task allocation under uncertainty and temporal constraints

    Shushman Choudhury;Jayesh K. Gupta;Mykel J. Kochenderfer;Dorsa Sadigh

  • Active Preference-Based Gaussian Process Regression for Reward Learning

    Erdem Biyik;Nicolas Huynh;Mykel J. Kochenderfer;Dorsa Sadigh

  • When Humans Aren't Optimal: Robots that Collaborate with Risk-Aware Humans

    Minae Kwon;Erdem Biyik;Aditi Talati;Karan Bhasin

  • Learning Reward Functions by Integrating Human Demonstrations and Preferences

    Malayandi Palan;Nicholas C. Landolfi;Gleb Shevchuk;Dorsa Sadigh

Frequent Co-Authors

Sanjit A. Seshia
Sanjit A. Seshia University of California, Berkeley
Shankar Sastry
Shankar Sastry University of California, Berkeley
Jeannette Bohg
Jeannette Bohg Stanford University
Mykel J. Kochenderfer
Mykel J. Kochenderfer Stanford University
Stefano Ermon
Stefano Ermon Stanford University
Anca D. Dragan
Anca D. Dragan University of California, Berkeley
Percy Liang
Percy Liang Stanford University
Noah D. Goodman
Noah D. Goodman Stanford University
Chelsea Finn
Chelsea Finn Stanford University
Alberto Sangiovanni-Vincentelli
Alberto Sangiovanni-Vincentelli University of California, Berkeley

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you're interested in studying Computer Science in the USA, there are several related online degrees and career paths worth exploring. Many students find value in branching into fields like engineering, physics, and data science, all of which draw on similar technical foundations.

For those passionate about solving environmental challenges with technology, environmental engineering schools online provide flexible programs that blend engineering, science, and sustainability. Another pathway is pursuing an online degree in mechanical engineering, which equips graduates with knowledge for industries ranging from robotics to automotive engineering.

If you're seeking a more theoretical edge, consider applying for the cheapest online physics degree. This option offers a strong analytical foundation to complement computer science skills. Aspiring data professionals can also benefit from the cheapest master in data science programs, perfect for launching a career in big data, AI, or analytics.

Exploring these pathways can broaden your skill set and open up diverse, high-demand career opportunities across many technology sectors.

Best Scientists Citing Dorsa Sadigh

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles