World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 47 5909 5670 1 1 128 6618

Enrico Benetto publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Enrico Benetto between 2004 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Enrico Benetto published across 22 years, from 2004 to 2025, averaging 7 papers a year. Output peaked at 20 publications in 2013. 9 of the 155 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2004 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 20. Peak 20 publications in 2013. 2004: 2 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 1 publication 2009: 2 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 20 publications 2014: 19 publications 2015: 20 publications 2016: 14 publications 2017: 15 publications 2018: 8 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 8 publications 2021: 6 publications 2022: 6 publications 2023: 6 publications 2024: 5 publications 2025: 4 publications
2004 2025

155 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Enrico Benetto: publications per year, 2004 to 2025
Year Publications
2004 2
2005 0
2006 2
2007 2
2008 1
2009 2
2010 3
2011 2
2012 6
2013 20
2014 19
2015 20
2016 14
2017 15
2018 8
2019 4
2020 8
2021 6
2022 6
2023 6
2024 5
2025 4
Total 155
Download as CSV

Enrico Benetto publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Enrico Benetto sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 121–130 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 128 publications — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617 128
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Enrico Benetto D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Enrico Benetto sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 47 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275 47
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Overview

Enrico Benetto is affiliated with the Luxembourg Institute of Science and Technology in Luxembourg and focuses on research within the fields of Environmental Science and Economics, Econometrics and Finance. Their work spans several subfields, including Environmental Engineering, Economics and Econometrics, Strategy and Management, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, and Building and Construction.

The main topics explored in Benetto's research include Environmental Impact and Sustainability, Climate Change Policy and Economics, Sustainable Supply Chain Management, Sustainable Finance and Green Bonds, Recycling and Waste Management Techniques, Sustainable Building Design and Assessment, and Building Energy and Comfort Optimization.

Benetto has contributed to multiple publication venues with a concentration in:

  • Journal of Cleaner Production
  • Environmental Research Letters
  • Frontiers in Sustainability
  • Sustainable Production and Consumption
  • Resources Conservation and Recycling

Their recent scholarly papers cover a range of issues primarily focused on sustainability, life cycle assessment, and environmental frameworks:

  • Measuring the sustainability of investment funds: A critical review of methods and frameworks in sustainable finance, 2021, Journal of Cleaner Production
  • Life-cycle assessment to guide solutions for the triple planetary crisis, 2023, Nature Reviews Earth & Environment
  • Attributional & Consequential Life Cycle Assessment: Definitions, Conceptual Characteristics and Modelling Restrictions, 2021, Sustainability
  • Addressing temporal considerations in life cycle assessment, 2020, The Science of The Total Environment
  • A framework using BIM and digital twins in facilitating LCSA for buildings, 2023, Journal of Building Engineering

Frequent coauthors with whom Benetto has collaborated include:

  • Thomas Schaubroeck
  • Thomas Gibon
  • Elorri Igos
  • I. Popescu
  • Paul Baustert

Benetto's research integrates methodologies from several scientific domains to address complex sustainability challenges through quantitative assessments such as life cycle assessment (LCA) and sustainable finance frameworks. The broad interdisciplinary approach spans from technical environmental engineering processes to strategic economic modeling and sustainable management practices within industries and built environments.

Best Publications

  • How to treat uncertainties in life cycle assessment studies

    Elorri Igos;Enrico Benetto;Rodolphe Meyer;Paul Baustert

  • A comprehensive review of carbon footprint analysis as an extended environmental indicator in the wine sector

    Benedetto Rugani;Ian Vázquez-Rowe;Graziella Benedetto;Enrico Benetto

  • Life Cycle Assessment of biogas production by monofermentation of energy crops and injection into the natural gas grid

    Colin Jury;Enrico Benetto;Daniel Koster;Bianca Schmitt

  • Life Cycle Assessment of building stocks from urban to transnational scales: A review

    Alessio Mastrucci;Antonino Marvuglia;Ulrich Leopold;Enrico Benetto

  • A review of urban metabolism studies to identify key methodological choices for future harmonization and implementation

    Didier Beloin-Saint-Pierre;Benedetto Rugani;Sébastien Lasvaux;Adélaïde Mailhac

  • Measuring the sustainability of investment funds: A critical review of methods and frameworks in sustainable finance

    Ioana-Stefania Popescu;Claudia Hitaj;Enrico Benetto

  • Geospatial characterization of building material stocks for the life cycle assessment of end-of-life scenarios at the urban scale

    Alessio Mastrucci;Antonino Marvuglia;Emil Popovici;Ulrich Leopold

  • Life cycle assessment of ecological sanitation system for small-scale wastewater treatment.

    Enrico Benetto;Diep Nguyen;Torben Lohmann;Bianca Schmitt

  • Improvements to Emergy evaluations by using Life Cycle Assessment.

    Benedetto Rugani;Enrico Benetto

  • Environmental assessment of digestate treatment technologies using LCA methodology.

    Ian Vázquez-Rowe;Ian Vázquez-Rowe;Katarzyna Golkowska;Viooltje Lebuf;Céline Vaneeckhaute

  • Elimination of pharmaceutical residues in biologically pre-treated hospital wastewater using advanced UV irradiation technology: a comparative assessment.

    C. Köhler;S. Venditti;E. Igos;K. Klepiszewski

  • Attributional & consequential life cycle assessment : Definitions, conceptual characteristics and modelling restrictions

    Thomas Schaubroeck;Simon Schaubroeck;Reinout Heijungs;Alessandra Zamagni

  • Applying consequential LCA to support energy policy: Land use change effects of bioenergy production

    Ian Vázquez-Rowe;Antonino Marvuglia;Sameer Rege;Enrico Benetto

  • Tapping carbon footprint variations in the European wine sector

    Ian Vázquez-Rowe;Benedetto Rugani;Enrico Benetto

  • Integrating emergy into LCA: Potential added value and lingering obstacles

    Marco Raugei;Marco Raugei;Marco Raugei;Benedetto Rugani;Enrico Benetto;Wesley W. Ingwersen

  • Modelling approaches for consequential life-cycle assessment (C-LCA) of bioenergy: Critical review and proposed framework for biogas production

    Antonino Marvuglia;Enrico Benetto;Sameer Rege;Colin Jury

  • Addressing temporal considerations in life cycle assessment

    Didier Beloin-Saint-Pierre;Ariane Christine Albers;Arnaud Helias;Ligia Tiruta-Barna

  • Integrating fuzzy multicriteria analysis and uncertainty evaluation in life cycle assessment

    Enrico Benetto;Christiane Dujet;Patrick Rousseaux

  • Combination of equilibrium models and hybrid life cycle-input–output analysis to predict the environmental impacts of energy policy scenarios

    Elorri Igos;Benedetto Rugani;Sameer Rege;Enrico Benetto

  • Designing Sustainable Technologies, Products and Policies : From Science to Innovation

    Enrico Benetto;Kilian Gericke;Mélanie Guiton

  • On the feasibility of using emergy analysis as a source of benchmarking criteria through data envelopment analysis: A case study for wind energy

    Diego Iribarren;Ian Vázquez-Rowe;Benedetto Rugani;Enrico Benetto

  • An input–output based framework to evaluate human labour in life cycle assessment

    Benedetto Rugani;Daryna Panasiuk;Enrico Benetto

  • Life Cycle Assessment of water treatment: what is the contribution of infrastructure and operation at unit process level?

    Elorri Igos;Alice Dalle;Ligia Tiruta-Barna;Enrico Benetto

  • Assessment of Life Cycle Impacts on Ecosystem Services: Promise, Problems, and Prospects

    Benoit Othoniel;Benedetto Rugani;Reinout Heijungs;Enrico Benetto

  • Is it better to remove pharmaceuticals in decentralized or conventional wastewater treatment plants? A life cycle assessment comparison

    Elorri Igos;Enrico Benetto;Silvia Venditti;Christian Kohler

Frequent Co-Authors

Ian Vázquez-Rowe
Ian Vázquez-Rowe Pontifical Catholic University of Peru
Florin Capitanescu
Florin Capitanescu Luxembourg Institute of Science and Technology
Laurent Drouet
Laurent Drouet European Institute
Reinout Heijungs
Reinout Heijungs Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Miguel Brandão
Miguel Brandão Royal Institute of Technology
Marco Raugei
Marco Raugei Oxford Brookes University
Jeroen B. Guinée
Jeroen B. Guinée Leiden University
Diego Iribarren
Diego Iribarren Madrid Institute for Advanced Studies
Erik Meers
Erik Meers Ghent University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Environmental Sciences often leads to diverse and impactful career options. For those interested in the Earth's physical processes, pursuing a geologist degree online offers flexibility and access to specialized knowledge in earth materials, natural hazards, and resource management.

Geospatial technologies play a critical role in environmental analysis and planning. Many professionals turn to top GIS masters programs to develop advanced skills in mapping and spatial data management, which are essential for sustainable development and conservation efforts.

Another avenue is environmental policy and administration. Degrees such as the best online masters in public administration empower graduates to influence environmental regulations, lead public initiatives, and manage resources effectively in government or nonprofit sectors.

Understanding societal impacts and human behavior is also vital. Pursuing the best online bachelor degree in sociology complements environmental studies by addressing social dynamics that affect environmental justice and community resilience.

Best Scientists Citing Enrico Benetto

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles