World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Economics and Finance 78 300 269 220 193 191 75032

Luc Anselin publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Luc Anselin between 1980 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Luc Anselin published across 46 years, from 1980 to 2025, averaging 6.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 27 publications in 2024. 29 of the 314 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1980 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 27. Peak 27 publications in 2024. 1980: 2 publications 1981: 2 publications 1982: 4 publications 1983: 4 publications 1984: 6 publications 1985: 1 publication 1986: 2 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 19 publications 1989: 3 publications 1990: 8 publications 1991: 8 publications 1992: 6 publications 1993: 6 publications 1994: 3 publications 1995: 5 publications 1996: 4 publications 1997: 5 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 13 publications 2001: 8 publications 2002: 6 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 10 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 8 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 14 publications 2009: 12 publications 2010: 11 publications 2011: 12 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 10 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 0 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 9 publications 2020: 10 publications 2021: 14 publications 2022: 6 publications 2023: 3 publications 2024: 27 publications 2025: 2 publications
1980 2025

314 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Luc Anselin: publications per year, 1980 to 2025
Year Publications
1980 2
1981 2
1982 4
1983 4
1984 6
1985 1
1986 2
1987 0
1988 19
1989 3
1990 8
1991 8
1992 6
1993 6
1994 3
1995 5
1996 4
1997 5
1998 3
1999 4
2000 13
2001 8
2002 6
2003 5
2004 10
2005 5
2006 8
2007 5
2008 14
2009 12
2010 11
2011 12
2012 9
2013 10
2014 5
2015 6
2016 4
2017 0
2018 5
2019 9
2020 10
2021 14
2022 6
2023 3
2024 27
2025 2
Total 314
Download as CSV

Luc Anselin publications per year - data summary

  • Luc Anselin, a Economics and Finance scholar from University of Chicago, has 314 publications recorded across 46 years, from 1980 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1980 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2024, with 27 publications.
  • The least productive year with any output is 1985, with 1 publication.
  • 2 of the 46 years in the span carry no publications at all (1987 and 2017).
  • The rate of publication averages 6.8 papers per year over the whole span, or 7.1 per year counting only the 44 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 52 publications, 17% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1980-1995: 79 publications (4.9 per year); 1996-2011: 125 publications (7.8 per year); 2012-2025: 110 publications (7.9 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Luc Anselin publication distribution in Economics and Finance in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Economics and Finance in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Luc Anselin sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 42–46 to 521+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 111. Most scientists, 111, have 137–141 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 521 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 187–191 publications, is where this scientist sits. 42–46 publications: 1 scientist 47–51 publications: 12 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 23 scientists 62–66 publications: 32 scientists 67–71 publications: 36 scientists 72–76 publications: 56 scientists 77–81 publications: 57 scientists 82–86 publications: 70 scientists 87–91 publications: 86 scientists 92–96 publications: 72 scientists 97–101 publications: 106 scientists 102–106 publications: 97 scientists 107–111 publications: 96 scientists 112–116 publications: 101 scientists 117–121 publications: 103 scientists 122–126 publications: 102 scientists 127–131 publications: 108 scientists 132–136 publications: 107 scientists 137–141 publications: 111 scientists 142–146 publications: 94 scientists 147–151 publications: 96 scientists 152–156 publications: 100 scientists 157–161 publications: 74 scientists 162–166 publications: 68 scientists 167–171 publications: 91 scientists 172–176 publications: 76 scientists 177–181 publications: 75 scientists 182–186 publications: 61 scientists 187–191 publications: 66 scientists 192–196 publications: 68 scientists 197–201 publications: 71 scientists 202–206 publications: 60 scientists 207–211 publications: 56 scientists 212–216 publications: 44 scientists 217–221 publications: 51 scientists 222–226 publications: 65 scientists 227–231 publications: 48 scientists 232–236 publications: 59 scientists 237–241 publications: 37 scientists 242–246 publications: 37 scientists 247–251 publications: 41 scientists 252–256 publications: 43 scientists 257–261 publications: 33 scientists 262–266 publications: 34 scientists 267–271 publications: 39 scientists 272–276 publications: 25 scientists 277–281 publications: 29 scientists 282–286 publications: 29 scientists 287–291 publications: 26 scientists 292–296 publications: 31 scientists 297–301 publications: 31 scientists 302–306 publications: 24 scientists 307–311 publications: 28 scientists 312–316 publications: 24 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 14 scientists 327–331 publications: 25 scientists 332–336 publications: 18 scientists 337–341 publications: 16 scientists 342–346 publications: 18 scientists 347–351 publications: 15 scientists 352–356 publications: 17 scientists 357–361 publications: 19 scientists 362–366 publications: 16 scientists 367–371 publications: 17 scientists 372–376 publications: 7 scientists 377–381 publications: 18 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 19 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 13 scientists 407–411 publications: 13 scientists 412–416 publications: 5 scientists 417–421 publications: 10 scientists 422–426 publications: 6 scientists 427–431 publications: 12 scientists 432–436 publications: 9 scientists 437–441 publications: 9 scientists 442–446 publications: 10 scientists 447–451 publications: 12 scientists 452–456 publications: 8 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 5 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 7 scientists 487–491 publications: 8 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 4 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 7 scientists 517–520 publications: 7 scientists 521+ publications: 99 scientists
42–46 publications 521+

This scientist: 191 publications — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 521 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Economics and Finance scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,760 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
42–46 1
47–51 12
52–56 7
57–61 23
62–66 32
67–71 36
72–76 56
77–81 57
82–86 70
87–91 86
92–96 72
97–101 106
102–106 97
107–111 96
112–116 101
117–121 103
122–126 102
127–131 108
132–136 107
137–141 111
142–146 94
147–151 96
152–156 100
157–161 74
162–166 68
167–171 91
172–176 76
177–181 75
182–186 61
187–191 66 191
192–196 68
197–201 71
202–206 60
207–211 56
212–216 44
217–221 51
222–226 65
227–231 48
232–236 59
237–241 37
242–246 37
247–251 41
252–256 43
257–261 33
262–266 34
267–271 39
272–276 25
277–281 29
282–286 29
287–291 26
292–296 31
297–301 31
302–306 24
307–311 28
312–316 24
317–321 13
322–326 14
327–331 25
332–336 18
337–341 16
342–346 18
347–351 15
352–356 17
357–361 19
362–366 16
367–371 17
372–376 7
377–381 18
382–386 13
387–391 19
392–396 9
397–401 10
402–406 13
407–411 13
412–416 5
417–421 10
422–426 6
427–431 12
432–436 9
437–441 9
442–446 10
447–451 12
452–456 8
457–461 4
462–466 7
467–471 4
472–476 5
477–481 6
482–486 7
487–491 8
492–496 5
497–501 4
502–506 4
507–511 5
512–516 7
517–520 7
521+ 99
Download as CSV

Luc Anselin publication distribution in Economics and Finance in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 3,760 Economics and Finance scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 97 ranges running from 42–46 to 521+ publications.
  • Luc Anselin, a Economics and Finance scholar from University of Chicago, records 191 publications - the 58th percentile of the discipline.
  • 58% of ranked Economics and Finance scientists score the same or lower than Luc Anselin, and about 42% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 167–171 publications range, and Luc Anselin ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 137–141 publications, holding 111 scientists (3% of the field).
  • 48% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 162–166 publications), so the distribution leans towards the lower end of the scale.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 521 publications or more, 99 scientists in all (3% of the field).

Luc Anselin D-index placement in Economics and Finance in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Economics and Finance scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Luc Anselin sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 72 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 101+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 178. Most scientists, 178, have 33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 101 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 78 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 126 scientists 31 D-Index: 147 scientists 32 D-Index: 157 scientists 33 D-Index: 178 scientists 34 D-Index: 171 scientists 35 D-Index: 141 scientists 36 D-Index: 132 scientists 37 D-Index: 129 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 120 scientists 40 D-Index: 117 scientists 41 D-Index: 113 scientists 42 D-Index: 114 scientists 43 D-Index: 97 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 86 scientists 46 D-Index: 78 scientists 47 D-Index: 83 scientists 48 D-Index: 62 scientists 49 D-Index: 74 scientists 50 D-Index: 50 scientists 51 D-Index: 66 scientists 52 D-Index: 69 scientists 53 D-Index: 55 scientists 54 D-Index: 67 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 62 scientists 57 D-Index: 45 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 47 scientists 60 D-Index: 46 scientists 61 D-Index: 36 scientists 62 D-Index: 37 scientists 63 D-Index: 56 scientists 64 D-Index: 50 scientists 65 D-Index: 32 scientists 66 D-Index: 28 scientists 67 D-Index: 30 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 25 scientists 70 D-Index: 22 scientists 71 D-Index: 21 scientists 72 D-Index: 26 scientists 73 D-Index: 24 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 12 scientists 76 D-Index: 14 scientists 77 D-Index: 15 scientists 78 D-Index: 15 scientists 79 D-Index: 17 scientists 80 D-Index: 17 scientists 81 D-Index: 11 scientists 82 D-Index: 10 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 11 scientists 85 D-Index: 5 scientists 86 D-Index: 9 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 9 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 6 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 8 scientists 93 D-Index: 10 scientists 94 D-Index: 11 scientists 95 D-Index: 6 scientists 96 D-Index: 4 scientists 97 D-Index: 4 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100 D-Index: 8 scientists 101+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 101+

This scientist: 78 D-Index — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 101 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Economics and Finance scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,760 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 126
31 147
32 157
33 178
34 171
35 141
36 132
37 129
38 130
39 120
40 117
41 113
42 114
43 97
44 115
45 86
46 78
47 83
48 62
49 74
50 50
51 66
52 69
53 55
54 67
55 61
56 62
57 45
58 34
59 47
60 46
61 36
62 37
63 56
64 50
65 32
66 28
67 30
68 24
69 25
70 22
71 21
72 26
73 24
74 23
75 12
76 14
77 15
78 15 78
79 17
80 17
81 11
82 10
83 16
84 11
85 5
86 9
87 13
88 9
89 7
90 6
91 4
92 8
93 10
94 11
95 6
96 4
97 4
98 6
99 6
100 8
101+ 100
Download as CSV

Luc Anselin D-index placement in Economics and Finance in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 3,760 Economics and Finance scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 72 ranges running from 30 to 101+ D-Index.
  • Luc Anselin, a Economics and Finance scholar from University of Chicago, records 78 D-Index - the 92nd percentile of the discipline.
  • 92% of ranked Economics and Finance scientists score the same or lower than Luc Anselin, and about 8% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 44 D-Index range, and Luc Anselin ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 33 D-Index, holding 178 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 59% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 47 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 101 D-Index or more, 100 scientists in all (3% of the field).

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2011 - Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences
  • 2008 - Member of the National Academy of Sciences

Overview

Luc Anselin is affiliated with the University of Chicago in the United States. Their work primarily focuses on the intersection of economics, econometrics, and public health with an emphasis on spatial data analysis and epidemiology. Their research spans multiple disciplines including economics, econometrics, finance, medicine, public health, environmental health, occupational health, epidemiology, transportation, and general health professions.

The main topics addressed in their work include:

  • Spatial and Panel Data Analysis
  • Housing Market and Economics
  • Regional Economics and Spatial Analysis
  • Data-Driven Disease Surveillance
  • Urban Transport and Accessibility
  • Health Disparities and Outcomes
  • COVID-19 Epidemiological Studies

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Luc Anselin cover both methodological developments and applied research. These include:

  • "GeoDa, From the Desktop to an Ecosystem for Exploring Spatial Data" (2021), published in Geographical Analysis
  • "Tobler's Law in a Multivariate World" (2020), published in Geographical Analysis

In addition to these, frequently cited collaborative works related to spatial data science and social science include:

  • "The PySAL Ecosystem: Philosophy and Implementation" (2021), Geographical Analysis
  • "An open software environment to make spatial access metrics more accessible" (2021), Journal of Computational Social Science
  • "The effects of different travel modes and travel destinations on COVID-19 transmission in global cities" (2021), Science Bulletin

Luc Anselin frequently collaborates with scholars such as:

  • Sergio J. Rey
  • Daniel Arribas-Bel
  • Levi John Wolf
  • James Gaboardi
  • Julia Koschinsky

Their research outputs are often published in specialized venues including:

  • Geographical Analysis
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Journal of Geographical Systems
  • Cities
  • Journal of Computational Social Science

Luc Anselin has been recognized through memberships and fellowships, notably as a Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences since 2011 and as a Member of the National Academy of Sciences since 2008. Their profile is reflective of interdisciplinary research integrating spatial analytical methods with economic and health-related inquiries.

Best Publications

  • Local Indicators of Spatial Association—LISA

    Luc Anselin

  • Spatial Econometrics: Methods and Models

    Luc Anselin

  • Local Geographic Spillovers between University Research and High Technology Innovations

    Luc Anselin;Attila Varga;Zoltan Acs;Zoltan Acs

  • Patents and innovation counts as measures of regional production of new knowledge

    Zoltan J Acs;Luc Anselin;Attila Varga

  • Simple diagnostic tests for spatial dependence

    Luc Anselin;Anil K. Bera;Raymond Florax;Mann J. Yoon

  • GeoDa: An Introduction to Spatial Data Analysis

    Luc Anselin;Ibnu Syabri;Youngihn Kho

  • Under the hood Issues in the specification and interpretation of spatial regression models

    Luc Anselin

  • The Moran scatterplot as an ESDA tool to assess local instability in spatial association

    Luc Anselin

  • Spatial Externalities, Spatial Multipliers, And Spatial Econometrics

    Luc Anselin

  • Lagrange Multiplier Test Diagnostics for Spatial Dependence and Spatial Heterogeneity

    Luc Anselin

  • Properties of Tests for Spatial Dependence in Linear Regression Models

    Luc Anselin;Serge Rey

  • Spatial Panel Econometrics

    Luc Anselin;Julie Le Gallo;Hubert Jayet

  • Assessing Spatial Equity: An Evaluation of Measures of Accessibility to Public Playgrounds:

    E Talen;L Anselin

  • Thirty years of spatial econometrics

    Luc Anselin

  • Measuring the benefits of air quality improvement: a spatial hedonic approach

    Chong Won Kim;Tim T Phipps;Luc Anselin

  • Under the hood Issues in the specification and interpretation of spatial regression models

    Unknown

  • Interactive Techniques and Exploratory Spatial Data Analysis

    Luc Anselin

  • Advances in Spatial Econometrics: Methodology, Tools and Applications

    R.J.G.M. Florax;L. Anselin;S.J. Rey

  • New Directions in Spatial Econometrics

    Luc Anselin;Raymond J. G. M. Florax

  • Spatial Statistical Analysis and Geographic Information Systems

    Luc Anselin;Arthur Getis

  • Small Sample Properties of Tests for Spatial Dependence in Regression Models: Some Further Results

    Luc Anselin;Raymond J. G. M. Florax

Frequent Co-Authors

Raymond J.G.M. Florax
Raymond J.G.M. Florax Purdue University West Lafayette
Emily Talen
Emily Talen University of Chicago
Zoltan J. Acs
Zoltan J. Acs George Mason University
Michael F. Goodchild
Michael F. Goodchild University of California, Santa Barbara
John O'Loughlin
John O'Loughlin University of Colorado Boulder
Steven F. Messner
Steven F. Messner University at Albany, State University of New York
Uwe Deichmann
Uwe Deichmann World Bank
Tony H. Grubesic
Tony H. Grubesic University of California, Riverside
Daniel A. Griffith
Daniel A. Griffith The University of Texas at Dallas
Mercedes Pascual
Mercedes Pascual University of Chicago

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Social Sciences and Humanities has become more flexible with the advent of accredited distance learning options. For those looking to advance their education quickly, online masters programs can help you gain specialized knowledge within just one year. These programs are ideal for working professionals or recent graduates who want to deepen their expertise without a long-term commitment.

If you’re looking for a faster route to your bachelor's degree, many schools now offer online accelerated programs. These allow you to complete your undergraduate studies at a quicker pace, helping you enter the workforce sooner or move on to graduate studies.

Cost is a common concern, especially in fields like social work. Fortunately, there are cheap online msw programs that deliver both affordability and quality, preparing you for rewarding careers in community services and counseling.

For those interested in behavioral analysis, you can now train to become a certified professional through bcba online programs. These flexible, affordable courses can set you on a path toward licensure and specialized roles in education or healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing Luc Anselin

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles