World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
55
Citations
15981
World Ranking
14810
National Ranking
6195

Jay C. Unkeless publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jay C. Unkeless sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 96 publications — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Jay C. Unkeless D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jay C. Unkeless sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jay C. Unkeless is affiliated with the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai in the United States. This association situates them within a prominent medical research environment, contributing to various scientific studies and advancements.

There are no recent papers, co-authors, publication venues, book publications, main fields or subfields of study, or main topics of work listed in the available data.

No awards or distinctions have been recorded.

The profile remains focused on their institutional affiliation without additional detailed information concerning their research output, collaboration network, or specific academic contributions.

Best Publications

  • An enzymatic function associated with transformation of fibroblasts by oncogenic viruses. I. Chick embryo fibroblast cultures transformed by avian RNA tumor viruses.

    J. C. Unkeless;A. Tobia;L. Ossowski;J. P. Quigley

  • Human Neutrophil Fc Gamma Receptor Distribution and Structure

    Howard B. Fleit;Samuel D. Wright;Jay C. Unkeless

  • Toll-Like Receptors on Tumor Cells Facilitate Evasion of Immune Surveillance

    Bo Huang;Jie Zhao;Hongxing Li;Kai-Li He

  • Structure and function of human and murine receptors for IgG.

    Jay C. Unkeless;Eileen Scigliano;Victoria H. Freedman

  • Treatment of refractory immune thrombocytopenic purpura with an anti-Fcγ-receptor antibody

    Sarah B. Clarkson;James B. Bussel;Robert P. Kimberly;Jay E. Valinsky

  • TLR signaling by tumor and immune cells: a double-edged sword.

    B Huang;J Zhao;J C Unkeless;Z H Feng

  • SCF-mediated mast cell infiltration and activation exacerbate the inflammation and immunosuppression in tumor microenvironment

    Bo Huang;Zhang Lei;Gui-Mei Zhang;Dong Li

  • Structural Aspects and Heterogeneity of Immunoglobulin Fc Receptors

    Jay C. Unkeless;Howard Fleit;Ira S. Mellman

  • Function and heterogeneity of human Fc receptors for immunoglobulin G.

    Jay C. Unkeless

  • Interleukin 10 suppresses Th17 cytokines secreted by macrophages and T cells

    Yongpeng Gu;Jianfei Yang;Xinshou Ouyang;Weicheng Liu

  • Effects of immobilized immune complexes on Fc- and complement-receptor function in resident and thioglycollate-elicited mouse peritoneal macrophages.

    Josef Michl;Margaret M. Pieczonka;Jay C. Unkeless;Samuel C. Silverstein

  • Partial purification of a lipoprotein with 5'-nucleotidase activity from membranes of rat liver cells.

    Christopher C. Widnell;Jay C. Unkeless

  • Listeria monocytogenes Promotes Tumor Growth via Tumor Cell Toll-Like Receptor 2 Signaling

    Bo Huang;Jie Zhao;Shiqian Shen;Hongxing Li

  • Internalization and degradation of macrophage Fc receptors during receptor-mediated phagocytosis.

    I S Mellman;H Plutner;R M Steinman;J C Unkeless

  • Purificaton of a functional mouse Fc receptor through the use of a monoclonal antibody.

    Ira S. Mellman;Jay C. Unkeless

  • INHIBITORY RECEPTORS, ITIM SEQUENCES AND PHOSPHATASES

    Jay C Unkeless;Jie Jin

  • Blockade of clearance of immune complexes by an anti-F(cγ) receptor monoclonal antibody

    SB Clarkson;RP Kimberly;JE Valinsky;Witmer

  • Toll-Like Receptor Signaling in Small Intestinal Epithelium Promotes B-Cell Recruitment and IgA Production in Lamina Propria

    Limin Shang;Masayuki Fukata;Nanthakumar Thirunarayanan;Andrea P. Martin

  • Regulation of phagocytosis and [Ca2+]i flux by distinct regions of an Fc receptor.

    Joseph A. Odin;Jeffrey C. Edberg;Catherine J. Painter;Robert P. Kimberly

  • IRF-8/Interferon (IFN) Consensus Sequence-binding Protein Is Involved in Toll-like Receptor (TLR) Signaling and Contributes to the Cross-talk between TLR and IFN-γ Signaling Pathways

    Jie Zhao;Hee Jeong Kong;Hongxing Li;Bo Huang

Frequent Co-Authors

Lloyd Mayer
Lloyd Mayer Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Huabao Xiong
Huabao Xiong Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Robert P. Kimberly
Robert P. Kimberly University of Alabama at Birmingham
Jeffrey C. Edberg
Jeffrey C. Edberg University of Alabama at Birmingham
Constantin A. Bona
Constantin A. Bona Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Keiko Ozato
Keiko Ozato Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
Sergio A. Lira
Sergio A. Lira Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Samuel D. Wright
Samuel D. Wright CSL (United States)
Samuel C. Silverstein
Samuel C. Silverstein Columbia University
James B. Bussel
James B. Bussel Cornell University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees related to Biology and Biochemistry opens up a range of career paths beyond traditional lab roles. Many students consider medical billing and coding, which is in high demand thanks to the growth of the healthcare industry. If you're curious about earning potential, find out how much does a medical coder make and whether this pathway could be a good fit for your skills.

While the field offers flexibility and remote work opportunities, it also comes with challenges. Consider both advantages and drawbacks by reading about is medical billing and coding a good career to make an informed decision.

For those looking to advance their careers in the management of healthcare data, you can explore accredited and health information management online degree programs. These degrees can lead to leadership roles in hospitals, insurance companies, and research facilities.

Nutrition sciences are another popular field among biology graduates. If you're considering postgrad study, explore the cost of masters degree in nutrition to compare programs and plan your next academic step.

Best Scientists Citing Jay C. Unkeless

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles