World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Milena Corredig

Milena Corredig

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Chemistry 73 4873 4429 37 36 314 24961

Milena Corredig publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Milena Corredig between 1993 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Milena Corredig published across 33 years, from 1993 to 2025, averaging 12.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 39 publications in 2024. 66 of the 424 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1993 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 39. Peak 39 publications in 2024. 1993: 1 publication 1994: 0 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 2 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 4 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 9 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 12 publications 2005: 8 publications 2006: 12 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 16 publications 2009: 19 publications 2010: 21 publications 2011: 25 publications 2012: 25 publications 2013: 18 publications 2014: 24 publications 2015: 16 publications 2016: 17 publications 2017: 14 publications 2018: 7 publications 2019: 12 publications 2020: 10 publications 2021: 10 publications 2022: 19 publications 2023: 32 publications 2024: 39 publications 2025: 27 publications
1993 2025

424 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Milena Corredig: publications per year, 1993 to 2025
Year Publications
1993 1
1994 0
1995 1
1996 2
1997 3
1998 3
1999 1
2000 4
2001 3
2002 9
2003 6
2004 12
2005 8
2006 12
2007 8
2008 16
2009 19
2010 21
2011 25
2012 25
2013 18
2014 24
2015 16
2016 17
2017 14
2018 7
2019 12
2020 10
2021 10
2022 19
2023 32
2024 39
2025 27
Total 424
Download as CSV

Milena Corredig publications per year - data summary

  • Milena Corredig, a Chemistry scholar from Aarhus University, has 424 publications recorded across 33 years, from 1993 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1993 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2024, with 39 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1993, 1995 and 1999, with 1 publication each.
  • 1 of the 33 years in the span carries no publications at all (1994).
  • The rate of publication averages 12.8 papers per year over the whole span, or 13.3 per year counting only the 32 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 127 publications, 30% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1993-2003: 33 publications (3.0 per year); 2004-2014: 188 publications (17.1 per year); 2015-2025: 203 publications (18.5 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Milena Corredig publication distribution in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Chemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Milena Corredig sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000 1,250
Bar chart with 63 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 61–80 to 1,295+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,350. Most scientists, 1,350, have 161–180 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 301–320 publications, is where this scientist sits. 61–80 publications: 66 scientists 81–100 publications: 302 scientists 101–120 publications: 623 scientists 121–140 publications: 918 scientists 141–160 publications: 1,218 scientists 161–180 publications: 1,350 scientists 181–200 publications: 1,344 scientists 201–220 publications: 1,281 scientists 221–240 publications: 1,216 scientists 241–260 publications: 1,100 scientists 261–280 publications: 979 scientists 281–300 publications: 939 scientists 301–320 publications: 764 scientists 321–340 publications: 643 scientists 341–360 publications: 628 scientists 361–380 publications: 522 scientists 381–400 publications: 459 scientists 401–420 publications: 397 scientists 421–440 publications: 327 scientists 441–460 publications: 270 scientists 461–480 publications: 265 scientists 481–500 publications: 252 scientists 501–520 publications: 201 scientists 521–540 publications: 185 scientists 541–560 publications: 148 scientists 561–580 publications: 148 scientists 581–600 publications: 132 scientists 601–620 publications: 114 scientists 621–640 publications: 104 scientists 641–660 publications: 91 scientists 661–680 publications: 92 scientists 681–700 publications: 73 scientists 701–720 publications: 57 scientists 721–740 publications: 54 scientists 741–760 publications: 67 scientists 761–780 publications: 45 scientists 781–800 publications: 46 scientists 801–820 publications: 39 scientists 821–840 publications: 32 scientists 841–860 publications: 36 scientists 861–880 publications: 29 scientists 881–900 publications: 26 scientists 901–920 publications: 24 scientists 921–940 publications: 14 scientists 941–960 publications: 23 scientists 961–980 publications: 28 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 15 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 29 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 12 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 19 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 12 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 6 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 8 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 12 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 5 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 6 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 14 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 7 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 2 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 6 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 4 scientists 1,281–1,294 publications: 6 scientists 1,295+ publications: 100 scientists
61–80 publications 1,295+

This scientist: 314 publications — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
61–80 66
81–100 302
101–120 623
121–140 918
141–160 1,218
161–180 1,350
181–200 1,344
201–220 1,281
221–240 1,216
241–260 1,100
261–280 979
281–300 939
301–320 764 314
321–340 643
341–360 628
361–380 522
381–400 459
401–420 397
421–440 327
441–460 270
461–480 265
481–500 252
501–520 201
521–540 185
541–560 148
561–580 148
581–600 132
601–620 114
621–640 104
641–660 91
661–680 92
681–700 73
701–720 57
721–740 54
741–760 67
761–780 45
781–800 46
801–820 39
821–840 32
841–860 36
861–880 29
881–900 26
901–920 24
921–940 14
941–960 23
961–980 28
981–1,000 15
1,001–1,020 29
1,021–1,040 12
1,041–1,060 19
1,061–1,080 12
1,081–1,100 6
1,101–1,120 8
1,121–1,140 12
1,141–1,160 5
1,161–1,180 6
1,181–1,200 14
1,201–1,220 7
1,221–1,240 2
1,241–1,260 6
1,261–1,280 4
1,281–1,294 6
1,295+ 100
Download as CSV

Milena Corredig publication distribution in Chemistry in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 17,934 Chemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 63 ranges running from 61–80 to 1,295+ publications.
  • Milena Corredig, a Chemistry scholar from Aarhus University, records 314 publications - the 66th percentile of the discipline.
  • 66% of ranked Chemistry scientists score the same or lower than Milena Corredig, and about 34% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 241–260 publications range, and Milena Corredig ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 161–180 publications, holding 1,350 scientists (8% of the field).
  • 77% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 361–380 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Milena Corredig D-index placement in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Chemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Milena Corredig sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 159+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,051. Most scientists, 1,051, have 56–57 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 72–73 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 612 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 808 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 776 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 835 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 861 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 872 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 933 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,051 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 930 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 882 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 834 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 731 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 775 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 683 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 646 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 561 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 501 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 437 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 388 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 354 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 292 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 275 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 254 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 235 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 185 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 192 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 155 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 163 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 125 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 105 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 105 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 112 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 88 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 68 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 69 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 65 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 79 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 61 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 44 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 37 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 40 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 33 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 26 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 34 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 35 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 25 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 27 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 17 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 16 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 20 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 20 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 15 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 9 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 16 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 11 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 9 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 3 scientists 158 D-Index: 3 scientists 159+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40–41 D-Index 159+

This scientist: 73 D-Index — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 289
42–43 612
44–45 808
46–47 776
48–49 835
50–51 861
52–53 872
54–55 933
56–57 1,051
58–59 930
60–61 882
62–63 834
64–65 731
66–67 775
68–69 683
70–71 646
72–73 561 73
74–75 501
76–77 437
78–79 388
80–81 354
82–83 292
84–85 275
86–87 254
88–89 235
90–91 185
92–93 192
94–95 155
96–97 163
98–99 125
100–101 105
102–103 105
104–105 112
106–107 88
108–109 68
110–111 69
112–113 65
114–115 79
116–117 61
118–119 44
120–121 37
122–123 40
124–125 33
126–127 26
128–129 34
130–131 35
132–133 25
134–135 27
136–137 17
138–139 16
140–141 20
142–143 20
144–145 15
146–147 9
148–149 9
150–151 16
152–153 11
154–155 9
156–157 3
158 3
159+ 98
Download as CSV

Milena Corredig D-index placement in Chemistry in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 17,934 Chemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 61 ranges running from 40–41 to 159+ D-Index.
  • Milena Corredig, a Chemistry scholar from Aarhus University, records 73 D-Index - the 73rd percentile of the discipline.
  • 73% of ranked Chemistry scientists score the same or lower than Milena Corredig, and about 27% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 62–63 D-Index range, and Milena Corredig ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 56–57 D-Index, holding 1,051 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 70% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 70–71 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Overview

Milena Corredig is affiliated with Aarhus University in Denmark and has contributed extensively to the fields of agricultural and biological sciences, with a primary focus on food science. Their scholarly output includes 184 publications within this domain, emphasizing the study of proteins in food systems and food composition.

Their research spans several specialized subfields, including food science, nutrition and dietetics, molecular biology, plant science, and animal science and zoology.

Key topics addressed across their work include:

  • Proteins in Food Systems
  • Food composition and properties
  • Polysaccharides Composition and Applications
  • Microencapsulation and Drying Processes
  • Meat and Animal Product Quality
  • Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
  • Food Chemistry and Fat Analysis

The scientist's recent papers highlight their continued engagement with food science and sustainability issues. Notable publications include:

  • "Design future foods using plant protein blends for best nutritional and technological functionality," 2021, Trends in Food Science & Technology
  • "Chemical testing of mechanically recycled polyethylene terephthalate for food packaging in the European Union," 2021, Resources Conservation and Recycling
  • "Sustainable food packaging: An updated definition following a holistic approach," 2023, Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems
  • "Freezing as a solution to preserve the quality of dairy products: the case of milk, curds and cheese," 2020, Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition
  • "RuBisCO from alfalfa - native subunits preservation through sodium sulfite addition and reduced solubility after acid precipitation followed by freeze-drying," 2021, LWT

Frequent publication venues for their work are concentrated in journals related to food science and research, including:

  • Food Hydrocolloids
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Food Research International
  • Food Chemistry
  • Current Research in Food Science

Collaboration has been a significant aspect of Milena Corredig's research activity. Frequent co-authors include Sandra Beyer Gregersen, Emmanouil Tsochatzis, Norbert Raak, Ilke Uysal-Unalan, and Ulf Andersen. These partnerships have contributed to multiple publications and reflect cross-disciplinary engagement within food sciences.

Best Publications

  • A standardised static in vitro digestion method suitable for food – an international consensus

    M. Minekus;Marie Alminger;P. Alvito;S. Ballance

  • INFOGEST static in vitro simulation of gastrointestinal food digestion

    André Brodkorb;Lotti Egger;Marie Alminger;Paula Alvito

  • The Structure of the Casein Micelle of Milk and Its Changes During Processing

    Douglas G Dalgleish;Milena Corredig

  • Stability and biological activity of wild blueberry (Vaccinium angustifolium) polyphenols during simulated in vitro gastrointestinal digestion.

    J. Correa-Betanzo;E. Allen-Vercoe;J. McDonald;K. Schroeter

  • The mechanisms of the heat-induced interaction of whey proteins with casein micelles in milk

    Milena Corredig;Douglas G Dalgleish

  • Polysaccharide–protein interactions in dairy matrices, control and design of structures

    Milena Corredig;Negin Sharafbafi;Eleana Kristo

  • Effect of temperature and pH on the interactions of whey proteins with casein micelles in skim milk

    Milena Corredig;Douglas G. Dalgleish

  • Emulsifying properties of soybean soluble polysaccharide

    Akihiro Nakamura;Taro Takahashi;Ryuji Yoshida;Hirokazu Maeda

  • Heat-induced changes in oil-in-water emulsions stabilized with soy protein isolate

    Maneephan Keerati-u-rai;Milena Corredig

  • Heating of milk alters the binding of curcumin to casein micelles. A fluorescence spectroscopy study

    S. Rahimi Yazdi;M. Corredig

  • Impact of interfacial composition on emulsion digestion and rate of lipid hydrolysis using different in vitro digestion models.

    Amir Malaki Nik;Amanda J. Wright;Milena Corredig

  • Structural changes of soy proteins at the oil-water interface studied by fluorescence spectroscopy.

    Maneephan Keerati-u-rai;Matteo Miriani;Matteo Miriani;Stefania Iametti;Francesco Bonomi

  • Effect of different heat treatments on the strong binding interactions between whey proteins and milk fat globules in whole milk

    Milena Corredig;Douglas G. Dalgleish

  • Effect of hydrocolloid type on texture of pureed carrots: Rheological and sensory measures

    Madhu Sharma;Eleana Kristo;Milena Corredig;Lisa Duizer

  • Production of a Novel Ingredient from Buttermilk

    M. Corredig;R.R. Roesch;D.G. Dalgleish

  • Interactions between tea catechins and casein micelles and their impact on renneting functionality

    Sanaz Haratifar;Milena Corredig

  • Effect of dynamic high pressure homogenization on the aggregation state of soy protein.

    Maneephan Keerati-U-Rai;Milena Corredig

  • Effects of the amount and type of fatty acids present in millets on their in vitro starch digestibility and expected glycemic index (eGI)

    George Amponsah Annor;Massimo Marcone;Milena Corredig;Eric Bertoft

  • Design future foods using plant protein blends for best nutritional and technological functionality

    Luis Miguel Jiménez-Munoz;Guilherme M. Tavares;Milena Corredig

  • The stabilizing behaviour of soybean soluble polysaccharide and pectin in acidified milk beverages

    Akihiro Nakamura;Ryuji Yoshida;Hirokazu Maeda;Milena Corredig

  • Isolates from industrial buttermilk : Emulsifying properties of materials derived from the milk fat globule membrane

    Milena Corredig;Douglas G. Dalgleish

Frequent Co-Authors

Douglas G. Dalgleish
Douglas G. Dalgleish University of Guelph
Mansel W. Griffiths
Mansel W. Griffiths University of Guelph
Filippo Miglior
Filippo Miglior University of Guelph
Louise Wicker
Louise Wicker Louisiana State University
Bonnie A. Mallard
Bonnie A. Mallard University of Guelph
Flavio S Schenkel
Flavio S Schenkel University of Guelph
Sylvie L. Turgeon
Sylvie L. Turgeon Université Laval
Didier Dupont
Didier Dupont Institut Agro, France
Guillermo Reglero
Guillermo Reglero Autonomous University of Madrid
Gerd E. Vegarud
Gerd E. Vegarud Norwegian University of Life Sciences

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Chemistry in the USA opens doors to numerous related fields, particularly in forensics and applied sciences. For those interested in hands-on roles, exploring how to become an autopsy technician can be a rewarding path. This profession combines scientific knowledge with investigative skills, making it a vital part of forensic investigations.

If affordability is a priority, consider pursuing the cheapest online forensic science degree. Many reputable programs offer flexible options that allow students to gain essential expertise in this specialized area without the burden of high tuition fees.

For advanced study, an online master's in forensic psychology provides an interdisciplinary approach that merges chemistry with behavioral science. This degree prepares graduates for diverse careers addressing criminal behavior and mental health issues in legal contexts.

Overall, forensic careers continue to expand, encompassing roles such as crime lab analysts, forensic toxicologists, and crime scene investigators. These professions value strong chemistry fundamentals, making related online degrees a strategic choice for students aiming to enter the field.

Best Scientists Citing Milena Corredig

Trending Scientists