World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 88 13277 12496 6759 6252 260 24959

Robert W. Thompson publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Robert W. Thompson between 1964 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Robert W. Thompson published across 62 years, from 1964 to 2025, averaging 4.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 23 publications in 2021. 6 of the 274 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1964 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 23. Peak 23 publications in 2021. 1964: 1 publication 1965: 0 publications 1966: 0 publications 1967: 0 publications 1968: 0 publications 1969: 0 publications 1970: 0 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 1 publication 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 1 publication 1987: 4 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 3 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 3 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 12 publications 1997: 7 publications 1998: 8 publications 1999: 7 publications 2000: 6 publications 2001: 6 publications 2002: 15 publications 2003: 15 publications 2004: 13 publications 2005: 8 publications 2006: 11 publications 2007: 10 publications 2008: 13 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 10 publications 2012: 10 publications 2013: 19 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 11 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 3 publications 2020: 3 publications 2021: 23 publications 2022: 6 publications 2023: 6 publications 2024: 2 publications 2025: 4 publications
1964 2025

274 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Robert W. Thompson: publications per year, 1964 to 2025
Year Publications
1964 1
1965 0
1966 0
1967 0
1968 0
1969 0
1970 0
1971 0
1972 0
1973 0
1974 0
1975 1
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 1
1987 4
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 3
1993 1
1994 3
1995 4
1996 12
1997 7
1998 8
1999 7
2000 6
2001 6
2002 15
2003 15
2004 13
2005 8
2006 11
2007 10
2008 13
2009 6
2010 3
2011 10
2012 10
2013 19
2014 5
2015 4
2016 11
2017 7
2018 3
2019 3
2020 3
2021 23
2022 6
2023 6
2024 2
2025 4
Total 274
Download as CSV

Robert W. Thompson publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert W. Thompson sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 241–260 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 260 publications — 9th percentile

9% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545 260
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Robert W. Thompson D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert W. Thompson sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 88–89 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 88 D-Index — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970 88
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Robert W. Thompson is affiliated with Washington University in St. Louis in the United States. Their research contributions span the broad field of medicine, with a focus on surgery, radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, internal medicine, oncology, and emergency medical services.

The scientist's primary subfields of study are:

  • Surgery
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
  • Internal Medicine
  • Oncology
  • Emergency Medical Services

The scope of topics in Thompson's work covers various medical conditions and treatments, notably:

  • Peripheral Nerve Disorders
  • Shoulder Injury and Treatment
  • Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation
  • Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
  • Nerve Injury and Rehabilitation
  • Diagnosis and Treatment of Venous Diseases
  • Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis

Frequent collaborators of Thompson include:

  • J. Westley Ohman
  • Joep A.W. Teijink
  • Danita M. Goestenkors
  • Jens Goeteyn
  • Niels Pesser

Publications by Robert W. Thompson have appeared in various journals, with the most regular contributions in:

  • Journal of Vascular Surgery
  • Hand
  • Annals of Vascular Surgery
  • Genetics in Medicine Open
  • Gastroenterology

Recent scientific papers authored or coauthored by Thompson include:

  • Computer-Aided Detection Improves Adenomas per Colonoscopy for Screening and Surveillance Colonoscopy: A Randomized Trial, 2022, Gastroenterology
  • Thoracic Outlet Syndrome in the Overhead Athlete: Diagnosis and Treatment Recommendations, 2020, Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine
  • Evaluation and Management of Venous Thoracic Outlet Syndrome, 2020, Thoracic surgery clinics/Thorac. surg. clin.
  • Venographic classification and long-term surgical treatment outcomes for axillary-subclavian vein thrombosis due to venous thoracic outlet syndrome (Paget-Schroetter syndrome), 2022, Journal of Vascular Surgery
  • Surgical approaches for thoracic outlet decompression in the treatment of thoracic outlet syndrome, 2023, Journal of Thoracic Disease

Best Publications

  • Targeted gene disruption of matrix metalloproteinase-9 (gelatinase B) suppresses development of experimental abdominal aortic aneurysms

    Robert Pyo;Jason K. Lee;J. Michael Shipley;John A. Curci

  • Arginase-1–Expressing Macrophages Suppress Th2 Cytokine–Driven Inflammation and Fibrosis

    John T. Pesce;Thirumalai R. Ramalingam;Margaret M. Mentink-Kane;Mark S. Wilson

  • Long-term graft survival after penetrating keratoplasty.

    Robert W Thompson;Marianne O Price;Patrick J Bowers;Francis W Price

  • Toll-like receptor–induced arginase 1 in macrophages thwarts effective immunity against intracellular pathogens

    Karim C El Kasmi;Joseph E Qualls;John T Pesce;Amber M Smith

  • Immunopathology of schistosomiasis.

    Mark S Wilson;Margaret M Mentink-Kane;John T Pesce;Thirumalai R Ramalingam

  • Production and localization of 92-kilodalton gelatinase in abdominal aortic aneurysms. An elastolytic metalloproteinase expressed by aneurysm-infiltrating macrophages.

    R. W. Thompson;D. R. Holmes;R. A. Mertens;Shixiong Liao

  • Atherosclerotic Vascular Disease Conference Writing Group III: Pathophysiology

    David P. Faxon;Valentin Fuster;Peter Libby;Joshua A. Beckman

  • TH2 and TH17 inflammatory pathways are reciprocally regulated in asthma

    David F. Choy;Kevin M. Hart;Lee A. Borthwick;Aarti Shikotra

  • Doxycycline inhibition of aneurysmal degeneration in an elastase-induced rat model of abdominal aortic aneurysm: Preservation of aortic elastin associated with suppressed production of 92 kD gelatinase

    Drazen Petrinec;Shixiong Liao;Dennis R. Holmes;Jeffrey M. Reilly

  • Immunopathogenesis of schistosomiasis

    Thomas A. Wynn;Robert W. Thompson;Allen W. Cheever;Margaret M. Mentink-Kane

  • Prolonged administration of doxycycline in patients with small asymptomatic abdominal aortic aneurysms: report of a prospective (Phase II) multicenter study.

    B.Timothy Baxter;William H. Pearce;Eugene A. Waltke;Fred N. Littooy

  • Role of matrix metalloproteinases in abdominal aortic aneurysms

    Robert W. Thompson;William C. Parks

  • The IL-21 receptor augments Th2 effector function and alternative macrophage activation.

    John Pesce;Mallika Kaviratne;Thirumalai R. Ramalingam;Robert W. Thompson

  • Abdominal aortic aneurysms: basic mechanisms and clinical implications.

    Robert W. Thompson;Patrick J. Geraghty;Jason K. Lee

  • Pathogenesis of abdominal aortic aneurysms: A multidisciplinary research program supported by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute******

    Momtaz Wassef;B. Timothy Baxter;Rex L. Chisholm;Ronald L. Dalman

  • Spontaneous closure of selected iatrogenic pseudoaneurysms and arteriovenous fistulae

    Boulos Toursarkissian;Brent T. Allen;Drazen Petrinec;Robert W. Thompson

  • Preoperative treatment with doxycycline reduces aortic wall expression and activation of matrix metalloproteinases in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms.

    John A. Curci;Dongli Mao;Diane G. Bohner;Brent T. Allen

  • Doxycycline in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms and in mice: Comparison of serum levels and effect on aneurysm growth in mice

    Amy K. Prall;G.Matthew Longo;William G. Mayhan;Eugene A. Waltke

  • Neutrophil depletion inhibits experimental abdominal aortic aneurysm formation.

    Jonathan L. Eliason;Kevin K. Hannawa;Gorav Ailawadi;Indranil Sinha

  • Mast cells modulate the pathogenesis of elastase-induced abdominal aortic aneurysms in mice

    Jiusong Sun;Galina K. Sukhova;Min Yang;Paul J. Wolters

Frequent Co-Authors

Thomas A. Wynn
Thomas A. Wynn Pfizer (United States)
Allen W. Cheever
Allen W. Cheever National Institutes of Health
Gilbert R. Upchurch
Gilbert R. Upchurch University of Florida
William C. Parks
William C. Parks Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Joseph S. Coselli
Joseph S. Coselli Baylor College of Medicine
Galina K. Sukhova
Galina K. Sukhova Harvard Medical School
Scott A. LeMaire
Scott A. LeMaire Baylor College of Medicine
Joseph F. Urban
Joseph F. Urban United States Department of Agriculture
Peter Libby
Peter Libby Brigham and Women's Hospital
Peter J. Murray
Peter J. Murray Max Planck Society

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in healthcare, there are several alternative routes and online degrees to consider beyond traditional medical school. Many choose advanced roles in nursing or seek flexible, accelerated pathways to enter the field quickly.

One in-demand option is pursuing a phd in nursing, ideal for those committed to research, leadership, or academic roles. If cost is a critical concern, researching what is the cheapest rn to bsn program online can help registered nurses advance their credentials without incurring heavy debt.

For individuals who hold a non-nursing bachelor’s degree but want to enter nursing, programs like a direct entry msn online offer a fast-track to licensure and advanced practice. Those concerned about competitiveness can explore easy nursing schools to get into as an entry point into the field.

These varied online options can open rewarding career pathways in healthcare, making it easier to advance or transition into medicine-related roles.

Best Scientists Citing Robert W. Thompson

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles