World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 82 16253 15287 8171 7558 520 21881

Peter K. Henke publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Peter K. Henke between 1990 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Peter K. Henke published across 37 years, from 1990 to 2026, averaging 16.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 45 publications in 2022. 17 of the 605 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1990 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 45. Peak 45 publications in 2022. 1990: 1 publication 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 1 publication 1996: 0 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 1 publication 2000: 2 publications 2001: 6 publications 2002: 11 publications 2003: 22 publications 2004: 23 publications 2005: 18 publications 2006: 19 publications 2007: 26 publications 2008: 10 publications 2009: 18 publications 2010: 34 publications 2011: 20 publications 2012: 36 publications 2013: 23 publications 2014: 31 publications 2015: 32 publications 2016: 25 publications 2017: 21 publications 2018: 18 publications 2019: 22 publications 2020: 34 publications 2021: 32 publications 2022: 45 publications 2023: 33 publications 2024: 19 publications 2025: 16 publications 2026: 1 publication
1990 2026

605 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Peter K. Henke: publications per year, 1990 to 2026
Year Publications
1990 1
1991 0
1992 0
1993 0
1994 1
1995 1
1996 0
1997 3
1998 1
1999 1
2000 2
2001 6
2002 11
2003 22
2004 23
2005 18
2006 19
2007 26
2008 10
2009 18
2010 34
2011 20
2012 36
2013 23
2014 31
2015 32
2016 25
2017 21
2018 18
2019 22
2020 34
2021 32
2022 45
2023 33
2024 19
2025 16
2026 1
Total 605
Download as CSV

Peter K. Henke publications per year - data summary

  • Peter K. Henke, a Medicine scholar from University of Michigan–Ann Arbor, has 605 publications recorded across 37 years, from 1990 to 2026.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1990 and the most recent to 2026.
  • The most productive year is 2022, with 45 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1990, 1994, 1995, 1998 and others, with 1 publication each.
  • 4 of the 37 years in the span carry no publications at all (1991, 1992, 1993 and 1996).
  • The rate of publication averages 16.4 papers per year over the whole span, or 18.3 per year counting only the 33 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2022-2026) hold 114 publications, 19% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1990-2002: 27 publications (2.1 per year); 2003-2015: 312 publications (24.0 per year); 2016-2026: 266 publications (24.2 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Peter K. Henke publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter K. Henke sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 501–520 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 520 publications — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617 520
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Peter K. Henke publication distribution in Medicine in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 20,134 Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 86 ranges running from 101–120 to 1,796+ publications.
  • Peter K. Henke, a Medicine scholar from University of Michigan–Ann Arbor, records 520 publications - the 61st percentile of the discipline.
  • 61% of ranked Medicine scientists score the same or lower than Peter K. Henke, and about 39% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 441–460 publications range, and Peter K. Henke ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 341–360 publications, holding 922 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 64% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 521–540 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Peter K. Henke D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter K. Henke sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 82–83 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 82 D-Index — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027 82
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Peter K. Henke D-index placement in Medicine in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 20,134 Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 75 ranges running from 70–71 to 217+ D-Index.
  • Peter K. Henke, a Medicine scholar from University of Michigan–Ann Arbor, records 82 D-Index - the 21st percentile of the discipline.
  • 21% of ranked Medicine scientists score the same or lower than Peter K. Henke, and about 79% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 94–95 D-Index range, and Peter K. Henke ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 82–83 D-Index, holding 1,027 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 70% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 106–107 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Overview

Peter K. Henke is affiliated with the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on medicine, with a significant contribution to surgery, internal medicine, pulmonary and respiratory medicine, cardiology and cardiovascular medicine, and hematology.

The scientist's work covers several main topics, including venous thromboembolism diagnosis and management, peripheral artery disease management, diagnosis and treatment of venous diseases, cardiac, anesthesia and surgical outcomes, aortic aneurysm repair treatments, blood coagulation and thrombosis mechanisms, and central venous catheters and hemodialysis.

Peter K. Henke has contributed to numerous publications, with a notable presence in the following venues:

  • Journal of Vascular Surgery (43 publications)
  • Journal of Vascular Surgery Venous and Lymphatic Disorders (28 publications)
  • Arteriosclerosis Thrombosis and Vascular Biology (14 publications)
  • JVS Vascular Science (10 publications)
  • Circulation (8 publications)

The scientist is frequently collaborating with other researchers, including:

  • T. Andrea (37 co-authored works)
  • Nicholas H. Osborne (37 co-authored works)
  • Thomas W. Wakefield (28 co-authored works)
  • Jeremy Albright (26 co-authored works)
  • Sriganesh Sharma (23 co-authored works)

Recent notable papers authored or co-authored by Peter K. Henke include:

  • "Call to Action to Prevent Venous Thromboembolism in Hospitalized Patients: A Policy Statement From the American Heart Association," 2020, Circulation
  • "Practical diagnosis and treatment of suspected venous thromboembolism during COVID-19 pandemic," 2020, Journal of Vascular Surgery Venous and Lymphatic Disorders
  • "Thrombo-Inflammation in Cardiovascular Disease: An Expert Consensus Document from the Third Maastricht Consensus Conference on Thrombosis," 2020, Thrombosis and Haemostasis
  • "Resolution of Deep Venous Thrombosis: Proposed Immune Paradigms," 2020, International Journal of Molecular Sciences
  • "Genome-wide association meta-analysis identifies risk loci for abdominal aortic aneurysm and highlights PCSK9 as a therapeutic target," 2023, Nature Genetics

Best Publications

  • Management of venous leg ulcers: clinical practice guidelines of the Society for Vascular Surgery ® and the American Venous Forum.

    Thomas F. O'Donnell;Marc A. Passman;William A. Marston;William J. Ennis

  • A validation study of a retrospective venous thromboembolism risk scoring method.

    Vinita Bahl;Hsou Mei Hu;Peter K. Henke;Thomas W. Wakefield

  • The management of diabetic foot: A clinical practice guideline by the Society for Vascular Surgery in collaboration with the American Podiatric Medical Association and the Society for Vascular Medicine

    Anil Hingorani;Glenn M. LaMuraglia;Peter Henke;Mark H. Meissner

  • Mechanisms of Venous Thrombosis and Resolution

    Thomas W. Wakefield;Daniel D. Myers;Peter K. Henke

  • Renal artery aneurysms: a 35-year clinical experience with 252 aneurysms in 168 patients.

    Peter K. Henke;Jeffry D. Cardneau;Theodore H. Welling;Gilbert R. Upchurch

  • Surgical treatment of intact thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms in the United States: Hospital and surgeon volume-related outcomes

    John A Cowan;Justin B Dimick;Peter K Henke;Thomas S Huber

  • Risk factors and clinical impact of postoperative symptomatic venous thromboembolism

    Chethan Gangireddy;John R. Rectenwald;Gilbert R. Upchurch;Thomas W. Wakefield

  • Neutrophil depletion inhibits experimental abdominal aortic aneurysm formation.

    Jonathan L. Eliason;Kevin K. Hannawa;Gorav Ailawadi;Indranil Sinha

  • A National and Single Institutional Experience in the Contemporary Treatment of Acute Lower Extremity Ischemia

    Jonathan L. Eliason;Reid M. Wainess;Mary C. Proctor;Justin B. Dimick

  • Critical Review of Mouse Models of Venous Thrombosis

    Jose Antionio Diaz;Andrea T. Obi;Daniel D. Myers;Daniel D. Myers;Shirley K. Wrobleski

  • Surgeon specialty and provider volumes are related to outcome of intact abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in the United States

    Justin B Dimick;John A Cowan;James C Stanley;Peter K Henke

  • Individualized Venous Thromboembolism Risk Stratification Using the 2005 Caprini Score to Identify the Benefits and Harms of Chemoprophylaxis in Surgical Patients: A Meta-analysis.

    Christopher J. Pannucci;Lukasz Swistun;John K. MacDonald;Peter K. Henke

  • Epigenetic Changes in Bone Marrow Progenitor Cells Influence the Inflammatory Phenotype and Alter Wound Healing in Type 2 Diabetes

    Katherine A. Gallagher;Amrita Joshi;William F. Carson;Matthew Schaller

  • The Emerging Role of NETs in Venous Thrombosis and Immunothrombosis.

    Andrew S. Kimball;Andrea T. Obi;Jose A. Diaz;Peter K. Henke

  • Variation in death rate after abdominal aortic aneurysmectomy in the United States: impact of hospital volume, gender, and age.

    Justin B. Dimick;James C. Stanley;David A. Axelrod;David A. Axelrod;Andris Kazmers;Andris Kazmers

  • Patients undergoing infrainguinal bypass to treat atherosclerotic vascular disease are underprescribed cardioprotective medications: effect on graft patency, limb salvage, and mortality.

    Peter K Henke;Susan Blackburn;Mary C Proctor;Jeri Stevens

  • Variation in the Use of Lower Extremity Vascular Procedures for Critical Limb Ischemia

    Philip P. Goodney;Lori L. Travis;Brahmajee K. Nallamothu;Kerianne Holman

  • In Vivo Role of Neutrophil Extracellular Traps in Antiphospholipid Antibody-Mediated Venous Thrombosis.

    He Meng;Srilakshmi Yalavarthi;Yogendra Kanthi;Levi F. Mazza

  • D-dimer, P-selectin, and microparticles: novel markers to predict deep venous thrombosis. A pilot study

    John E. Rectenwald;Daniel D. Myers;Angela E. Hawley;Christopher Longo

  • Acute limb ischemia

    Peter K. Henke;John W. Rectenwald

Frequent Co-Authors

Thomas W. Wakefield
Thomas W. Wakefield University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Gilbert R. Upchurch
Gilbert R. Upchurch University of Florida
James C. Stanley
James C. Stanley University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Steven L. Kunkel
Steven L. Kunkel University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Justin B. Dimick
Justin B. Dimick University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Lazar J. Greenfield
Lazar J. Greenfield University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Philip P. Goodney
Philip P. Goodney Dartmouth–Hitchcock Medical Center
Cory M. Hogaboam
Cory M. Hogaboam Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
David M. Williams
David M. Williams Brown University
Ralph Weissleder
Ralph Weissleder Harvard University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The path to a medical career in the USA is diverse, and many students are exploring flexible, online alternatives to traditional in-person programs. For those who are already RNs, online rn to bsn programs without clinical requirements offer a convenient option for earning a bachelor’s degree while balancing work and family life. These programs eliminate the need for on-site clinicals, speeding up the completion process.

If you’re aiming for leadership or advanced practice roles, exploring online dnp programs can help you earn your Doctor of Nursing Practice degree more quickly. Many candidates are also searching for the most affordable dnp programs to minimize tuition costs and student debt while maximizing career opportunities.

For those seeking a faster entry point into nursing, there are lpn accelerated program options online. These let you start working in the healthcare field in a short timeframe. Carefully consider your career goals, time commitment, and financial investment as you explore these online pathways.

Best Scientists Citing Peter K. Henke

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles