World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
82
Citations
21881
World Ranking
16253
National Ranking
8171

Peter K. Henke publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter K. Henke sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 520 publications — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Peter K. Henke D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter K. Henke sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 82 D-Index — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Peter K. Henke is affiliated with the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on medicine, with a significant contribution to surgery, internal medicine, pulmonary and respiratory medicine, cardiology and cardiovascular medicine, and hematology.

The scientist's work covers several main topics, including venous thromboembolism diagnosis and management, peripheral artery disease management, diagnosis and treatment of venous diseases, cardiac, anesthesia and surgical outcomes, aortic aneurysm repair treatments, blood coagulation and thrombosis mechanisms, and central venous catheters and hemodialysis.

Peter K. Henke has contributed to numerous publications, with a notable presence in the following venues:

  • Journal of Vascular Surgery (43 publications)
  • Journal of Vascular Surgery Venous and Lymphatic Disorders (28 publications)
  • Arteriosclerosis Thrombosis and Vascular Biology (14 publications)
  • JVS Vascular Science (10 publications)
  • Circulation (8 publications)

The scientist is frequently collaborating with other researchers, including:

  • T. Andrea (37 co-authored works)
  • Nicholas H. Osborne (37 co-authored works)
  • Thomas W. Wakefield (28 co-authored works)
  • Jeremy Albright (26 co-authored works)
  • Sriganesh Sharma (23 co-authored works)

Recent notable papers authored or co-authored by Peter K. Henke include:

  • "Call to Action to Prevent Venous Thromboembolism in Hospitalized Patients: A Policy Statement From the American Heart Association," 2020, Circulation
  • "Practical diagnosis and treatment of suspected venous thromboembolism during COVID-19 pandemic," 2020, Journal of Vascular Surgery Venous and Lymphatic Disorders
  • "Thrombo-Inflammation in Cardiovascular Disease: An Expert Consensus Document from the Third Maastricht Consensus Conference on Thrombosis," 2020, Thrombosis and Haemostasis
  • "Resolution of Deep Venous Thrombosis: Proposed Immune Paradigms," 2020, International Journal of Molecular Sciences
  • "Genome-wide association meta-analysis identifies risk loci for abdominal aortic aneurysm and highlights PCSK9 as a therapeutic target," 2023, Nature Genetics

Best Publications

  • Management of venous leg ulcers: clinical practice guidelines of the Society for Vascular Surgery ® and the American Venous Forum.

    Thomas F. O'Donnell;Marc A. Passman;William A. Marston;William J. Ennis

  • A validation study of a retrospective venous thromboembolism risk scoring method.

    Vinita Bahl;Hsou Mei Hu;Peter K. Henke;Thomas W. Wakefield

  • The management of diabetic foot: A clinical practice guideline by the Society for Vascular Surgery in collaboration with the American Podiatric Medical Association and the Society for Vascular Medicine

    Anil Hingorani;Glenn M. LaMuraglia;Peter Henke;Mark H. Meissner

  • Mechanisms of Venous Thrombosis and Resolution

    Thomas W. Wakefield;Daniel D. Myers;Peter K. Henke

  • Renal artery aneurysms: a 35-year clinical experience with 252 aneurysms in 168 patients.

    Peter K. Henke;Jeffry D. Cardneau;Theodore H. Welling;Gilbert R. Upchurch

  • Surgical treatment of intact thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms in the United States: Hospital and surgeon volume-related outcomes

    John A Cowan;Justin B Dimick;Peter K Henke;Thomas S Huber

  • Risk factors and clinical impact of postoperative symptomatic venous thromboembolism

    Chethan Gangireddy;John R. Rectenwald;Gilbert R. Upchurch;Thomas W. Wakefield

  • Neutrophil depletion inhibits experimental abdominal aortic aneurysm formation.

    Jonathan L. Eliason;Kevin K. Hannawa;Gorav Ailawadi;Indranil Sinha

  • A National and Single Institutional Experience in the Contemporary Treatment of Acute Lower Extremity Ischemia

    Jonathan L. Eliason;Reid M. Wainess;Mary C. Proctor;Justin B. Dimick

  • Critical Review of Mouse Models of Venous Thrombosis

    Jose Antionio Diaz;Andrea T. Obi;Daniel D. Myers;Daniel D. Myers;Shirley K. Wrobleski

  • Surgeon specialty and provider volumes are related to outcome of intact abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in the United States

    Justin B Dimick;John A Cowan;James C Stanley;Peter K Henke

  • Individualized Venous Thromboembolism Risk Stratification Using the 2005 Caprini Score to Identify the Benefits and Harms of Chemoprophylaxis in Surgical Patients: A Meta-analysis.

    Christopher J. Pannucci;Lukasz Swistun;John K. MacDonald;Peter K. Henke

  • Epigenetic Changes in Bone Marrow Progenitor Cells Influence the Inflammatory Phenotype and Alter Wound Healing in Type 2 Diabetes

    Katherine A. Gallagher;Amrita Joshi;William F. Carson;Matthew Schaller

  • The Emerging Role of NETs in Venous Thrombosis and Immunothrombosis.

    Andrew S. Kimball;Andrea T. Obi;Jose A. Diaz;Peter K. Henke

  • Variation in death rate after abdominal aortic aneurysmectomy in the United States: impact of hospital volume, gender, and age.

    Justin B. Dimick;James C. Stanley;David A. Axelrod;David A. Axelrod;Andris Kazmers;Andris Kazmers

  • Patients undergoing infrainguinal bypass to treat atherosclerotic vascular disease are underprescribed cardioprotective medications: effect on graft patency, limb salvage, and mortality.

    Peter K Henke;Susan Blackburn;Mary C Proctor;Jeri Stevens

  • Variation in the Use of Lower Extremity Vascular Procedures for Critical Limb Ischemia

    Philip P. Goodney;Lori L. Travis;Brahmajee K. Nallamothu;Kerianne Holman

  • In Vivo Role of Neutrophil Extracellular Traps in Antiphospholipid Antibody-Mediated Venous Thrombosis.

    He Meng;Srilakshmi Yalavarthi;Yogendra Kanthi;Levi F. Mazza

  • D-dimer, P-selectin, and microparticles: novel markers to predict deep venous thrombosis. A pilot study

    John E. Rectenwald;Daniel D. Myers;Angela E. Hawley;Christopher Longo

  • Acute limb ischemia

    Peter K. Henke;John W. Rectenwald

Frequent Co-Authors

Thomas W. Wakefield
Thomas W. Wakefield University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Gilbert R. Upchurch
Gilbert R. Upchurch University of Florida
James C. Stanley
James C. Stanley University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Steven L. Kunkel
Steven L. Kunkel University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Justin B. Dimick
Justin B. Dimick University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Lazar J. Greenfield
Lazar J. Greenfield University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Philip P. Goodney
Philip P. Goodney Dartmouth–Hitchcock Medical Center
Cory M. Hogaboam
Cory M. Hogaboam Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
David M. Williams
David M. Williams Brown University
Ralph Weissleder
Ralph Weissleder Harvard University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The path to a medical career in the USA is diverse, and many students are exploring flexible, online alternatives to traditional in-person programs. For those who are already RNs, online rn to bsn programs without clinical requirements offer a convenient option for earning a bachelor’s degree while balancing work and family life. These programs eliminate the need for on-site clinicals, speeding up the completion process.

If you’re aiming for leadership or advanced practice roles, exploring online dnp programs can help you earn your Doctor of Nursing Practice degree more quickly. Many candidates are also searching for the most affordable dnp programs to minimize tuition costs and student debt while maximizing career opportunities.

For those seeking a faster entry point into nursing, there are lpn accelerated program options online. These let you start working in the healthcare field in a short timeframe. Carefully consider your career goals, time commitment, and financial investment as you explore these online pathways.

Best Scientists Citing Peter K. Henke

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles