World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Gilbert R. Upchurch

Gilbert R. Upchurch

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 87 13638 12833 6929 6409 632 27938

Gilbert R. Upchurch publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Gilbert R. Upchurch between 1986 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Gilbert R. Upchurch published across 41 years, from 1986 to 2026, averaging 18.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 49 publications in 2022. 17 of the 760 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1986 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 49. Peak 49 publications in 2022. 1986: 1 publication 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 2 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 1 publication 1992: 1 publication 1993: 1 publication 1994: 0 publications 1995: 5 publications 1996: 9 publications 1997: 6 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 9 publications 2002: 17 publications 2003: 35 publications 2004: 25 publications 2005: 21 publications 2006: 27 publications 2007: 18 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 26 publications 2010: 34 publications 2011: 23 publications 2012: 41 publications 2013: 31 publications 2014: 36 publications 2015: 30 publications 2016: 36 publications 2017: 25 publications 2018: 23 publications 2019: 39 publications 2020: 36 publications 2021: 42 publications 2022: 49 publications 2023: 43 publications 2024: 35 publications 2025: 16 publications 2026: 1 publication
1986 2026

760 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Gilbert R. Upchurch: publications per year, 1986 to 2026
Year Publications
1986 1
1987 0
1988 0
1989 2
1990 1
1991 1
1992 1
1993 1
1994 0
1995 5
1996 9
1997 6
1998 3
1999 2
2000 2
2001 9
2002 17
2003 35
2004 25
2005 21
2006 27
2007 18
2008 8
2009 26
2010 34
2011 23
2012 41
2013 31
2014 36
2015 30
2016 36
2017 25
2018 23
2019 39
2020 36
2021 42
2022 49
2023 43
2024 35
2025 16
2026 1
Total 760
Download as CSV

Gilbert R. Upchurch publications per year - data summary

  • Gilbert R. Upchurch, a Medicine scholar from University of Florida, has 760 publications recorded across 41 years, from 1986 to 2026.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1986 and the most recent to 2026.
  • The most productive year is 2022, with 49 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1986, 1990, 1991, 1992 and others, with 1 publication each.
  • 3 of the 41 years in the span carry no publications at all (1987, 1988 and 1994).
  • The rate of publication averages 18.5 papers per year over the whole span, or 20.0 per year counting only the 38 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2022-2026) hold 144 publications, 19% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1986-1999: 32 publications (2.3 per year); 2000-2013: 317 publications (22.6 per year); 2014-2026: 411 publications (31.6 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Gilbert R. Upchurch publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gilbert R. Upchurch sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 621–640 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 632 publications — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386 632
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Gilbert R. Upchurch publication distribution in Medicine in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 20,134 Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 86 ranges running from 101–120 to 1,796+ publications.
  • Gilbert R. Upchurch, a Medicine scholar from University of Florida, records 632 publications - the 75th percentile of the discipline.
  • 75% of ranked Medicine scientists score the same or lower than Gilbert R. Upchurch, and about 25% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 441–460 publications range, and Gilbert R. Upchurch ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 341–360 publications, holding 922 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 64% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 521–540 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Gilbert R. Upchurch D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gilbert R. Upchurch sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 86–87 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 87 D-Index — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960 87
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Gilbert R. Upchurch D-index placement in Medicine in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 20,134 Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 75 ranges running from 70–71 to 217+ D-Index.
  • Gilbert R. Upchurch, a Medicine scholar from University of Florida, records 87 D-Index - the 34th percentile of the discipline.
  • 34% of ranked Medicine scientists score the same or lower than Gilbert R. Upchurch, and about 66% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 94–95 D-Index range, and Gilbert R. Upchurch ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 82–83 D-Index, holding 1,027 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 70% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 106–107 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Overview

Gilbert R. Upchurch is affiliated with the University of Florida in the United States and has a significant body of work primarily in the field of medicine.

The primary fields of study include medicine, with notable subfields in pulmonary and respiratory medicine, surgery, cardiology and cardiovascular medicine, immunology, and public health, environmental and occupational health.

The main topics covered by their research encompass aortic aneurysm repair treatments, cardiac, anesthesia and surgical outcomes, aortic disease and treatment approaches, infectious aortic and vascular conditions, artificial intelligence in healthcare and education, diversity and career in medicine, and vascular procedures and complications.

Frequent publication venues for their work are:

  • Journal of Vascular Surgery
  • Annals of Vascular Surgery
  • Surgery
  • Journal of the American College of Surgeons
  • Arteriosclerosis Thrombosis and Vascular Biology

Their frequent coauthors include:

  • Salvatore T. Scali
  • Tyler J. Loftus
  • Thomas S. Huber
  • Michol A. Cooper
  • Azra Bihorac

Notable recent publications are:

  • 2022 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Aortic Disease: A Report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines (2022, Circulation)
  • Society for Vascular Surgery clinical practice guidelines of thoracic endovascular aortic repair for descending thoracic aortic aneurysms (2020, Journal of Vascular Surgery)
  • Performance of a Machine Learning Algorithm Using Electronic Health Record Data to Predict Postoperative Complications and Report on a Mobile Platform (2022, JAMA Network Open)
  • 2022 ACC/AHA guideline for the diagnosis and management of aortic disease (2023, Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery)
  • Phenotype clustering in health care: A narrative review for clinicians (2022, Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence)

Best Publications

  • Homocyst(e)ine decreases bioavailable nitric oxide by a mechanism involving glutathione peroxidase

    Gilbert R. Upchurch;George N. Welch;Attila J. Fabian;Jane E. Freedman

  • The care of patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm: The Society for Vascular Surgery practice guidelines

    Elliot L. Chaikof;David C. Brewster;Ronald L. Dalman;Michel S. Makaroun

  • Current concepts in the pathogenesis of abdominal aortic aneurysm

    Gorav Ailawadi;Jonathan L Eliason;Gilbert R Upchurch

  • Role and Results of Surgery in Acute Type B Aortic Dissection Insights From the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection (IRAD)

    Santi Trimarchi;Christoph A. Nienaber;Vincenzo Rampoldi;Truls Myrmel

  • Epidemiology of aortic aneurysm repair in the United States from 2000 to 2010.

    Anahita Dua;Anahita Dua;SreyRam Kuy;Cheong J. Lee;Gilbert R. Upchurch

  • Renal artery aneurysms: a 35-year clinical experience with 252 aneurysms in 168 patients.

    Peter K. Henke;Jeffry D. Cardneau;Theodore H. Welling;Gilbert R. Upchurch

  • Prolonged administration of doxycycline in patients with small asymptomatic abdominal aortic aneurysms: report of a prospective (Phase II) multicenter study.

    B.Timothy Baxter;William H. Pearce;Eugene A. Waltke;Fred N. Littooy

  • Surgical treatment of intact thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms in the United States: Hospital and surgeon volume-related outcomes

    John A Cowan;Justin B Dimick;Peter K Henke;Thomas S Huber

  • SVS practice guidelines for the care of patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm: Executive summary

    Elliot L. Chaikof;David C. Brewster;Ronald L. Dalman;Michel S. Makaroun

  • Artificial Intelligence and Surgical Decision-making

    Tyler J. Loftus;Patrick J. Tighe;Amanda C. Filiberto;Philip A. Efron

  • Risk factors and clinical impact of postoperative symptomatic venous thromboembolism

    Chethan Gangireddy;John R. Rectenwald;Gilbert R. Upchurch;Thomas W. Wakefield

  • Hepatic Resection in the United States: Indications, Outcomes, and Hospital Procedural Volumes From a Nationally Representative Database

    Justin B. Dimick;John A. Cowan;James A. Knol;Gilbert R. Upchurch

  • Neutrophil depletion inhibits experimental abdominal aortic aneurysm formation.

    Jonathan L. Eliason;Kevin K. Hannawa;Gorav Ailawadi;Indranil Sinha

  • A National and Single Institutional Experience in the Contemporary Treatment of Acute Lower Extremity Ischemia

    Jonathan L. Eliason;Reid M. Wainess;Mary C. Proctor;Justin B. Dimick

  • Perioperative outcomes after open and endovascular repair of intact abdominal aortic aneurysms in the United States during 2001.

    W.Anthony Lee;Jeffrey W Carter;Gilbert Upchurch;James M Seeger

  • Importance of refractory pain and hypertension in acute type B aortic dissection: insights from the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection (IRAD).

    Santi Trimarchi;Kim A. Eagle;Christoph A. Nienaber;Reed E. Pyeritz

  • National trends in the use and outcomes of hepatic resection

    Justin B Dimick;Reid M Wainess;John A Cowan;Gilbert R Upchurch

  • Surgeon specialty and provider volumes are related to outcome of intact abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in the United States

    Justin B Dimick;John A Cowan;James C Stanley;Peter K Henke

  • Hospital Teaching Status and Outcomes of Complex Surgical Procedures in the United States

    Justin B. Dimick;John A. Cowan;Lisa M. Colletti;Gilbert R. Upchurch

Frequent Co-Authors

Peter K. Henke
Peter K. Henke University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
James C. Stanley
James C. Stanley University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Justin B. Dimick
Justin B. Dimick University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Thomas W. Wakefield
Thomas W. Wakefield University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Irving L. Kron
Irving L. Kron University of Virginia
David M. Williams
David M. Williams Brown University
Kim A. Eagle
Kim A. Eagle University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Eric M. Isselbacher
Eric M. Isselbacher Harvard University
Christoph A. Nienaber
Christoph A. Nienaber National Institutes of Health

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a career in healthcare doesn't always mean pursuing a traditional medical degree. There are numerous alternative paths and online programs that can broaden your options. For those who already hold a non-nursing bachelor’s degree, exploring direct entry msn online programs can provide a fast-track into advanced nursing roles without needing prior nursing experience.

Entry requirements vary widely across institutions. Prospective nurses seeking flexible options can research the easiest nursing programs to get into, which may have lower GPA cut-offs or less competitive admissions processes.

Those interested in supportive health roles may benefit from programs that don’t require clinical placements. Careers in medical administration are accessible through online medical billing and coding schools that accept fafsa, opening doors to the industry with financial assistance.

Additionally, not all nursing paths request standardized entrance exams. You may wonder, do I need to take the teas test for LPN? Some accredited programs waive this requirement, making nursing more accessible to applicants from diverse backgrounds.

Best Scientists Citing Gilbert R. Upchurch

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles