World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Gilbert R. Upchurch

Gilbert R. Upchurch

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
87
Citations
27938
World Ranking
13638
National Ranking
6929

Gilbert R. Upchurch publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gilbert R. Upchurch sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 632 publications — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Gilbert R. Upchurch D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gilbert R. Upchurch sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 87 D-Index — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Gilbert R. Upchurch is affiliated with the University of Florida in the United States and has a significant body of work primarily in the field of medicine.

The primary fields of study include medicine, with notable subfields in pulmonary and respiratory medicine, surgery, cardiology and cardiovascular medicine, immunology, and public health, environmental and occupational health.

The main topics covered by their research encompass aortic aneurysm repair treatments, cardiac, anesthesia and surgical outcomes, aortic disease and treatment approaches, infectious aortic and vascular conditions, artificial intelligence in healthcare and education, diversity and career in medicine, and vascular procedures and complications.

Frequent publication venues for their work are:

  • Journal of Vascular Surgery
  • Annals of Vascular Surgery
  • Surgery
  • Journal of the American College of Surgeons
  • Arteriosclerosis Thrombosis and Vascular Biology

Their frequent coauthors include:

  • Salvatore T. Scali
  • Tyler J. Loftus
  • Thomas S. Huber
  • Michol A. Cooper
  • Azra Bihorac

Notable recent publications are:

  • 2022 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Aortic Disease: A Report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines (2022, Circulation)
  • Society for Vascular Surgery clinical practice guidelines of thoracic endovascular aortic repair for descending thoracic aortic aneurysms (2020, Journal of Vascular Surgery)
  • Performance of a Machine Learning Algorithm Using Electronic Health Record Data to Predict Postoperative Complications and Report on a Mobile Platform (2022, JAMA Network Open)
  • 2022 ACC/AHA guideline for the diagnosis and management of aortic disease (2023, Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery)
  • Phenotype clustering in health care: A narrative review for clinicians (2022, Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence)

Best Publications

  • Homocyst(e)ine decreases bioavailable nitric oxide by a mechanism involving glutathione peroxidase

    Gilbert R. Upchurch;George N. Welch;Attila J. Fabian;Jane E. Freedman

  • The care of patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm: The Society for Vascular Surgery practice guidelines

    Elliot L. Chaikof;David C. Brewster;Ronald L. Dalman;Michel S. Makaroun

  • Current concepts in the pathogenesis of abdominal aortic aneurysm

    Gorav Ailawadi;Jonathan L Eliason;Gilbert R Upchurch

  • Role and Results of Surgery in Acute Type B Aortic Dissection Insights From the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection (IRAD)

    Santi Trimarchi;Christoph A. Nienaber;Vincenzo Rampoldi;Truls Myrmel

  • Epidemiology of aortic aneurysm repair in the United States from 2000 to 2010.

    Anahita Dua;Anahita Dua;SreyRam Kuy;Cheong J. Lee;Gilbert R. Upchurch

  • Renal artery aneurysms: a 35-year clinical experience with 252 aneurysms in 168 patients.

    Peter K. Henke;Jeffry D. Cardneau;Theodore H. Welling;Gilbert R. Upchurch

  • Prolonged administration of doxycycline in patients with small asymptomatic abdominal aortic aneurysms: report of a prospective (Phase II) multicenter study.

    B.Timothy Baxter;William H. Pearce;Eugene A. Waltke;Fred N. Littooy

  • Surgical treatment of intact thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms in the United States: Hospital and surgeon volume-related outcomes

    John A Cowan;Justin B Dimick;Peter K Henke;Thomas S Huber

  • SVS practice guidelines for the care of patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm: Executive summary

    Elliot L. Chaikof;David C. Brewster;Ronald L. Dalman;Michel S. Makaroun

  • Artificial Intelligence and Surgical Decision-making

    Tyler J. Loftus;Patrick J. Tighe;Amanda C. Filiberto;Philip A. Efron

  • Risk factors and clinical impact of postoperative symptomatic venous thromboembolism

    Chethan Gangireddy;John R. Rectenwald;Gilbert R. Upchurch;Thomas W. Wakefield

  • Hepatic Resection in the United States: Indications, Outcomes, and Hospital Procedural Volumes From a Nationally Representative Database

    Justin B. Dimick;John A. Cowan;James A. Knol;Gilbert R. Upchurch

  • Neutrophil depletion inhibits experimental abdominal aortic aneurysm formation.

    Jonathan L. Eliason;Kevin K. Hannawa;Gorav Ailawadi;Indranil Sinha

  • A National and Single Institutional Experience in the Contemporary Treatment of Acute Lower Extremity Ischemia

    Jonathan L. Eliason;Reid M. Wainess;Mary C. Proctor;Justin B. Dimick

  • Perioperative outcomes after open and endovascular repair of intact abdominal aortic aneurysms in the United States during 2001.

    W.Anthony Lee;Jeffrey W Carter;Gilbert Upchurch;James M Seeger

  • Importance of refractory pain and hypertension in acute type B aortic dissection: insights from the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection (IRAD).

    Santi Trimarchi;Kim A. Eagle;Christoph A. Nienaber;Reed E. Pyeritz

  • National trends in the use and outcomes of hepatic resection

    Justin B Dimick;Reid M Wainess;John A Cowan;Gilbert R Upchurch

  • Surgeon specialty and provider volumes are related to outcome of intact abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in the United States

    Justin B Dimick;John A Cowan;James C Stanley;Peter K Henke

  • Hospital Teaching Status and Outcomes of Complex Surgical Procedures in the United States

    Justin B. Dimick;John A. Cowan;Lisa M. Colletti;Gilbert R. Upchurch

  • Society for Vascular Surgery clinical practice guidelines of thoracic endovascular aortic repair for descending thoracic aortic aneurysms

    Gilbert R. Upchurch;Guillermo A. Escobar;Ali Azizzadeh;Adam W. Beck

Frequent Co-Authors

Peter K. Henke
Peter K. Henke University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
James C. Stanley
James C. Stanley University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Justin B. Dimick
Justin B. Dimick University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Thomas W. Wakefield
Thomas W. Wakefield University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Irving L. Kron
Irving L. Kron University of Virginia
David M. Williams
David M. Williams Brown University
Kim A. Eagle
Kim A. Eagle University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Eric M. Isselbacher
Eric M. Isselbacher Harvard University
Christoph A. Nienaber
Christoph A. Nienaber National Institutes of Health

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a career in healthcare doesn't always mean pursuing a traditional medical degree. There are numerous alternative paths and online programs that can broaden your options. For those who already hold a non-nursing bachelor’s degree, exploring direct entry msn online programs can provide a fast-track into advanced nursing roles without needing prior nursing experience.

Entry requirements vary widely across institutions. Prospective nurses seeking flexible options can research the easiest nursing programs to get into, which may have lower GPA cut-offs or less competitive admissions processes.

Those interested in supportive health roles may benefit from programs that don’t require clinical placements. Careers in medical administration are accessible through online medical billing and coding schools that accept fafsa, opening doors to the industry with financial assistance.

Additionally, not all nursing paths request standardized entrance exams. You may wonder, do I need to take the teas test for LPN? Some accredited programs waive this requirement, making nursing more accessible to applicants from diverse backgrounds.

Best Scientists Citing Gilbert R. Upchurch

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles