World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
37
Citations
5865
World Ranking
8778
National Ranking
656

Clare Press publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Clare Press sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 79 publications — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Clare Press D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Clare Press sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Clare Press is affiliated with Birkbeck, University of London in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily spans the fields of neuroscience and psychology, with a focus on cognitive neuroscience. This includes specialized subfields such as social psychology, experimental and cognitive psychology, artificial intelligence, and clinical psychology.

The scientist's work covers a range of topics related to neural dynamics and brain function, neural and behavioral psychology studies, and visual perception and processing mechanisms. Additional areas of interest include action observation and synchronization, face recognition and perception, embodied and extended cognition, and functional brain connectivity studies.

Notable recent publications include:

  • "Action biases perceptual decisions toward expected outcomes." (2020, Journal of Experimental Psychology General)
  • "Action Enhances Predicted Touch" (2021, Psychological Science)
  • "Beliefs and desires in the predictive brain" (2020, Nature Communications)
  • "Cancelling cancellation? Sensorimotor control, agency, and prediction" (2022, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews)
  • "Predictions and errors are distinctly represented across V1 layers" (2024, Current Biology)

The scientist regularly collaborates with several colleagues, including Daniel Yon, Emily R. Thomas, Peter Kok, Richard Cook, and Floris P. de Lange.

Frequent publication venues for Clare Press include bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Cortex, Current Biology, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, and Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

Best Publications

  • Mirror neurons: from origin to function

    Richard Cook;Geoffrey Bird;Caroline Catmur;Clare Press

  • Intact automatic imitation of human and robot actions in autism spectrum disorders.

    Geoffrey Bird;Jane Leighton;Clare Press;Cecilia Heyes

  • Robotic movement elicits automatic imitation.

    Clare Press;Geoffrey Bird;Riidiger Flach;Cecilia Heyes

  • Atypical basic movement kinematics in autism spectrum conditions.

    Jennifer L. Cook;Sarah-Jayne Blakemore;Clare Press

  • The Role of Alexithymia in Reduced Eye-Fixation in Autism Spectrum Conditions

    Geoffrey Bird;Geoffrey Bird;Clare Press;Daniel C. Richardson

  • The Perceptual Prediction Paradox.

    Clare Press;Peter Kok;Daniel Yon;Daniel Yon

  • Can neurotypical individuals read autistic facial expressions? atypical production of emotional facial expressions in Autism Spectrum Disorders

    Rebecca Brewer;Federica Biotti;Caroline Catmur;Clare Press

  • Interaction takes two: Typical adults exhibit mind-blindness towards those with autism spectrum disorder.

    Rosanna Edey;Jennifer Cook;Rebecca Brewer;Mark H Johnson

  • Sensorimotor experience enhances automatic imitation of robotic action.

    Clare Press;Helge Gillmeister;Cecilia Heyes

  • The roles of feature-specific task set and bottom-up salience in attentional capture: An ERP study

    Martin Eimer;Monika Kiss;Clare Press;Disa Sauter;Disa Sauter

  • Action sharpens sensory representations of expected outcomes

    Daniel Yon;Sam J. Gilbert;Floris P. de Lange;Clare Press

  • Action observation and robotic agents: learning and anthropomorphism.

    Clare Press;Clare Press

  • Intact imitation of emotional facial actions in autism spectrum conditions.

    Clare Mary Press;Daniel Richardson;Geoffrey Bird

  • Dynamic Modulation of Human Motor Activity When Observing Actions

    Clare Press;Jennifer Cook;Sarah-Jayne Blakemore;James Kilner

  • Visual enhancement of touch in spatial body representation.

    Clare Press;Marisa Taylor-Clarke;Steffan Kennett;Patrick Haggard

  • Task-dependent and distinct roles of the temporoparietal junction and inferior frontal cortex in the control of imitation

    Jeremy Hogeveen;Sukhvinder S. Obhi;Michael J. Banissy;Idalmis Santiesteban

  • Automatic imitation of intransitive actions.

    Clare Press;Geoffrey Bird;Eamonn Walsh;Cecilia Heyes

  • Shared representations in body perception.

    Richard Thomas;Clare Press;Patrick Haggard

  • Manual response preparation and saccade programming are linked to attention shifts: ERP evidence for covert attentional orienting and spatially specific modulations of visual processing

    Martin Eimer;Jose L. Van Velzen;Elena Gherri;Elena Gherri;Clare Press

  • Bottom‐up, not top‐down, modulation of imitation by human and robotic models

    Clare Press;Helge Gillmeister;Cecilia Heyes

Frequent Co-Authors

Geoffrey Bird
Geoffrey Bird University of Oxford
Cecilia Heyes
Cecilia Heyes University of Oxford
Richard J. Cook
Richard J. Cook University of Waterloo
Caroline Catmur
Caroline Catmur King's College London
Martin Eimer
Martin Eimer Birkbeck, University of London
Patrick Haggard
Patrick Haggard University College London
James M. Kilner
James M. Kilner University College London
Richard B. Ivry
Richard B. Ivry University of California, Berkeley
Floris P. de Lange
Floris P. de Lange Radboud University
Iroise Dumontheil
Iroise Dumontheil Birkbeck, University of London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

A background in neuroscience can open doors to multiple career pathways across health, education, and research. Many students interested in this field may also consider related disciplines such as counseling, psychology, or family therapy, especially when seeking versatile and flexible career options.

For those aiming to support individuals and families, pursuing cacrep-accredited programs online provides robust training in professional counseling. Similarly, an online counseling degree offers the foundational knowledge needed for roles in mental health, schools, and community organizations.

Students interested in specializing further may explore a masters in marriage and family therapy online, focusing on systemic approaches and relationship dynamics. Additionally, advancing your expertise through a master in psychology online prepares graduates for careers in research, clinical practice, or private counseling.

Most of these online programs are designed to be affordable and flexible, accommodating students with diverse backgrounds, including those transitioning from neuroscience. Exploring these related degrees can help tailor your education to your specific interests and career goals.

Best Scientists Citing Clare Press

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles