World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
35
Citations
7887
World Ranking
11484
National Ranking
4720

Jim Blythe publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jim Blythe sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 115 publications — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Jim Blythe D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jim Blythe sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jim Blythe is affiliated with the University of Southern California in the United States. Their research spans multiple disciplines, primarily within the fields of Computer Science, Social Sciences, and Medicine.

The scientist's main areas of study include:

  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Information Systems
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics
  • Psychiatry and Mental Health

Key research topics addressed across their publications cover:

  • Misinformation and Its Impacts
  • Complex Network Analysis Techniques
  • Spam and Phishing Detection
  • User Authentication and Security Systems
  • Migraine and Headache Studies
  • Trigeminal Neuralgia and Treatments
  • Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments

Among their published papers are:

  • "Diagnostic accuracy of an artificial intelligence online engine in migraine: A multi-center study" (2022), published in Headache The Journal of Head and Face Pain
  • "Large-scale agent-based simulations of online social networks" (2022), published in Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems
  • "Eyes on URLs: Relating Visual Behavior to Safety Decisions" (2020), published in ACM Symposium on Eye Tracking Research and Applications
  • "User-Centered Risk Communication for Safer Browsing" (2020), published in SSRN Electronic Journal
  • "Information Integration for the Masses" (2020), published in TUGraz OPEN Library (Graz University of Technology)

The scientist collaborates frequently with several coauthors, including:

  • Alexey Tregubov
  • Vijay Kothari
  • Ross Koppel
  • Sean W. Smith
  • Kristina Lerman

The range of publication venues where their work has appeared reflects the interdisciplinary nature of their research, with contributions to:

  • Headache The Journal of Head and Face Pain
  • Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems
  • ACM Symposium on Eye Tracking Research and Applications
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • TUGraz OPEN Library (Graz University of Technology)

Best Publications

  • Pegasus: A framework for mapping complex scientific workflows onto distributed systems

    Ewa Deelman;Gurmeet Singh;Mei-Hui Su;James Blythe

  • Pegasus: Mapping Scientific Workflows onto the Grid

    Ewa Deelman;James Blythe;Yolanda Gil;Carl Kesselman

  • Mapping Abstract Complex Workflows onto Grid Environments

    Ewa Deelman;James Blythe;Yolanda Gil;Carl Kesselman

  • Integrating planning and learning: the PRODIGY architecture

    Manuela M. Veloso;Jaime G. Carbonell;M. Alicia Pérez;Daniel Borrajo

  • Task scheduling strategies for workflow-based applications in grids

    J. Blythe;S. Jain;E. Deelman;Y. Gil

  • An Intelligent Personal Assistant for Task and Time Management

    Karen L. Myers;Pauline Berry;Jim Blythe;Ken Conley

  • Artificial intelligence and grids: workflow planning and beyond

    Y. Gil;E. Deelman;J. Blythe;C. Kesselman

  • PRODIGY 4.0: The Manual and Tutorial

    Jim Blythe;Jaime G. Carbonell;Oren Etzioni;Yolanda Gil

  • Decision-Theoretic Planning

    Jim Blythe

  • An integrated environment for knowledge acquisition

    Jim Blythe;Jihie Kim;Surya Ramachandran;Yolanda Gil

  • The role of planning in Grid computing

    Jim Blythe;Ewa Deelman;Yolanda Gil;Carl Kesselman

  • The effect of spatial arrangement on judgments and errors in interpreting graphs

    Cathleen McGrath;Jim Blythe;David Krackhardt

  • Workflow management in GriPhyN

    Ewa Deelman;James Blythe;Yolanda Gil;Carl Kesselman

  • The Effect of Graph Layout on Inference from Social Network Data

    Jim Blythe;Cathleen McGrath;David Krackhardt

  • Workarounds to computer access in healthcare organizations: you want my password or a dead patient?

    Ross Koppel;Sean W. Smith;Jim Blythe;Vijay H. Kothari

  • An overview of planning under uncertainty

    Jim Blythe

  • Linkability: examining causal link commitments in partial-order planning

    Manuela Veloso;Jim Blythe

  • Pegasus: Planning for Execution in Grids

    Ewa Deelman;James Blythe;Yolanda Gil;Carl Kesselman

  • Planning with external events

    Jim Blythe

  • PLANET: A Shareable and Reusable Ontology for Representing Plans

    Yolanda Gil;Jim Blythe

Frequent Co-Authors

Yolanda Gil
Yolanda Gil University of Southern California
Ewa Deelman
Ewa Deelman University of Southern California
Sean W. Smith
Sean W. Smith Dartmouth College
Carl Kesselman
Carl Kesselman University of Southern California
Karan Vahi
Karan Vahi University of Southern California
Manuela Veloso
Manuela Veloso Carnegie Mellon University
Kristina Lerman
Kristina Lerman University of Southern California
Gaurang Mehta
Gaurang Mehta University of Southern California
Emilio Ferrara
Emilio Ferrara University of Southern California
Albert Lazzarini
Albert Lazzarini California Institute of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA opens doors to several other flexible learning options and rewarding careers. For students or professionals looking to stand out quickly, easy certifications that pay well offer a cost-effective and swift route to higher earning potential. These certifications can help you gain specialized skills and boost your job prospects even before completing a full degree.

If you want to earn an advanced qualification rapidly, the quickest online masters degree programs allow you to advance your education and enter the workforce sooner. These accelerated programs are designed for motivated individuals ready to fast-track their careers.

Choosing the right graduate program is crucial. Focusing on the most valuable masters degrees can position you for long-term success, particularly in high-demand fields such as tech, data science, or cyber security.

Alternatively, starting with an associate degree online is a smart way to build foundational knowledge affordably and with flexibility, making it easier to transfer credits if you pursue further education.

Best Scientists Citing Jim Blythe

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles