World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 45 7100 6894 3116 2998 320 10605

Daniel S. Katz publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Daniel S. Katz between 1991 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Daniel S. Katz published across 35 years, from 1991 to 2025, averaging 14.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 62 publications in 2022. 57 of the 492 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1991 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 62. Peak 62 publications in 2022. 1991: 2 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 1 publication 1994: 3 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 0 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 8 publications 2001: 7 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 8 publications 2004: 14 publications 2005: 8 publications 2006: 8 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 10 publications 2009: 9 publications 2010: 12 publications 2011: 16 publications 2012: 10 publications 2013: 11 publications 2014: 18 publications 2015: 12 publications 2016: 21 publications 2017: 24 publications 2018: 19 publications 2019: 32 publications 2020: 27 publications 2021: 27 publications 2022: 62 publications 2023: 40 publications 2024: 43 publications 2025: 14 publications
1991 2025

492 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Daniel S. Katz: publications per year, 1991 to 2025
Year Publications
1991 2
1992 1
1993 1
1994 3
1995 1
1996 0
1997 4
1998 4
1999 4
2000 8
2001 7
2002 5
2003 8
2004 14
2005 8
2006 8
2007 7
2008 10
2009 9
2010 12
2011 16
2012 10
2013 11
2014 18
2015 12
2016 21
2017 24
2018 19
2019 32
2020 27
2021 27
2022 62
2023 40
2024 43
2025 14
Total 492
Download as CSV

Daniel S. Katz publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel S. Katz sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 312–321 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 320 publications — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421
102–111 420
112–121 497
122–131 544
132–141 555
142–151 609
152–161 559
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583
192–201 519
202–211 508
212–221 490
222–231 437
232–241 423
242–251 408
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335
282–291 320
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238 320
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

Daniel S. Katz D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel S. Katz sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 44–45 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983
34–35 918
36–37 990
38–39 968
40–41 907
42–43 821
44–45 763 45
46–47 689
48–49 543
50–51 543
52–53 518
54–55 500
56–57 458
58–59 400
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2011 - ACM Senior Member

Overview

Daniel S. Katz is affiliated with the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields related to computer science and decision sciences, with significant focus on scientific computing, data management, and software engineering.

The main fields of study for Daniel S. Katz include:

  • Computer Science
  • Decision Sciences

More specifically, their work covers the following subfields of study:

  • Information Systems and Management
  • Information Systems
  • Computer Networks and Communications
  • Management Science and Operations Research
  • Artificial Intelligence

Key research topics addressed by their publications include:

  • Scientific Computing and Data Management
  • Research Data Management Practices
  • Distributed and Parallel Computing Systems
  • Data Quality and Management
  • Advanced Data Storage Technologies
  • Software Engineering Research
  • Cloud Computing and Resource Management

Their recent publications encompass a range of contributions, for example:

  • "Introducing the FAIR Principles for research software," 2022, Scientific Data
  • "Taking a fresh look at FAIR for research software," 2021, Patterns
  • "FAIR for AI: An interdisciplinary and international community building perspective," 2023, Scientific Data
  • "Recognizing the value of software: a software citation guide," 2021, F1000Research
  • "Convergence of artificial intelligence and high performance computing on NSF-supported cyberinfrastructure," 2020, Journal Of Big Data

They have published extensively in venues such as:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Computing in Science & Engineering
  • Scientific Data
  • F1000Research

Frequent co-authors contributing to their research include:

  • Neil Chue Hong
  • Deborah Silver
  • Saurabh Bagchi
  • Cyril Onwubiko
  • Michelle Barker

Over the course of their career, Daniel S. Katz has been recognized as an ACM Senior Member since 2011.

Best Publications

  • Pegasus: A framework for mapping complex scientific workflows onto distributed systems

    Ewa Deelman;Gurmeet Singh;Mei-Hui Su;James Blythe

  • Validation and extension to three dimensions of the Berenger PML absorbing boundary condition for FD-TD meshes

    D.S. Katz;E.T. Thiele;A. Taflove

  • Swift: A language for distributed parallel scripting

    Michael Wilde;Mihael Hategan;Justin M. Wozniak;Ben Clifford

  • Parsl: Pervasive Parallel Programming in Python

    Yadu Babuji;Anna Woodard;Zhuozhao Li;Daniel S. Katz

  • A Component Architecture for High-Performance Scientific Computing

    Benjamin A. Allan;Robert Armstrong;David E. Bernholdt;Felipe Bertrand

  • A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer review

    Jonathan P. Tennant;Jonathan M. Dugan;Daniel Graziotin;Damien C. Jacques

  • Montage: A grid enabled engine for delivering custom science-grade mosaics on demand

    G. Bruce Berriman;Ewa Deelman;John C. Good;Joseph C. Jacob

  • Software Citation Principles

    Arfon M. Smith;Daniel S. Katz;Kyle E. Niemeyer

  • Swift/T: Large-scale application composition via distributed-memory dataflow processing

    Justin M. Wozniak;Timothy G. Armstrong;Michael Wilde;Daniel S. Katz

  • Montage: a grid portal and software toolkit for science-grade astronomical image mosaicking

    Joseph C. Jacob;Daniel S. Katz;G. Bruce Berriman;John C. Good

  • A Roadmap for HEP Software and Computing R&D for the 2020s

    Johannes Albrecht;Antonio Augusto Alves;Guilherme Amadio;Giuseppe Andronico

  • Ten Simple Rules for Taking Advantage of Git and GitHub.

    Yasset Perez-Riverol;Laurent Gatto;Rui Wang;Timo Sachsenberg

  • Four simple recommendations to encourage best practices in research software

    Rafael C. Jiménez;Mateusz Kuzak;Monther Alhamdoosh;Michelle Barker

  • Workflow task clustering for best effort systems with Pegasus

    Gurmeet Singh;Mei-Hui Su;Karan Vahi;Ewa Deelman

  • The Journal of Open Source Software

    Arfon Smith;Lorena A. Barba;George Githinji;Melissa Gymrek

  • Crops In Silico: Generating Virtual Crops Using an Integrative and Multi-scale Modeling Platform

    Amy Marshall-Colon;Stephen P Long;Douglas K. Allen;Gabrielle Dawn Allen

  • Ultrawideband absorbing boundary condition for termination of waveguiding structures in FD-TD simulations

    C.E. Reuter;R.M. Joseph;E.T. Thiele;D.S. Katz

  • Exploring automatic, online failure recovery for scientific applications at extreme scales

    Marc Gamell;Daniel S. Katz;Hemanth Kolla;Jacqueline Chen

  • Montage: A Grid Enabled Image Mosaic Service for the National Virtual Observatory

    G. B. Berriman;J. C. Good;A. C. Laity;A. Bergou

  • Trends in Authorship in Anesthesiology Journals.

    Joanna Miller;Emuejevoke Chuba;Stacie Deiner;Samuel DeMaria

  • A roadmap for HEP software and computing R&D for the 2020s

    Johannes Albrecht;Antonio Augusto Alves;Guilherme Amadio;Giuseppe Andronico

  • Ten Simple Rules for Taking Advantage of Git and GitHub

    Yasset Perez-Riverol;Laurent Gatto;Rui Wang;Timo Sachsenberg

Frequent Co-Authors

Shantenu Jha
Shantenu Jha Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Michael Wilde
Michael Wilde Argonne National Laboratory
Ian Foster
Ian Foster University of Chicago
Ewa Deelman
Ewa Deelman University of Southern California
Kyle Chard
Kyle Chard University of Chicago
Omer F. Rana
Omer F. Rana Cardiff University
Carl Kesselman
Carl Kesselman University of Southern California
Manish Parashar
Manish Parashar University of Utah
Christopher R. Madan
Christopher R. Madan University of Nottingham
Edward Seidel
Edward Seidel University of Wyoming

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA opens the door to a growing range of flexible degree options and rewarding careers. For those concerned about academic history, finding a college with low gpa requirements can provide a pathway to enter the tech field, even if your previous grades weren’t perfect.

Students interested in accelerated learning can consider an computer science degree online, designed to help you graduate faster without sacrificing quality. These programs often offer flexible schedules and practical coursework for busy learners.

Career possibilities also expand with interdisciplinary interests. For instance, if you’re passionate about sustainability, a dual background opens doors to jobs with elementary education and environmental science degree, or you may pursue roles at the intersection of tech and the environment.

Engineering-minded students can further explore an online environmental engineering degree science and engineering to combine computing with critical problem-solving in ecology and infrastructure. Each pathway unlocks unique opportunities in today’s dynamic workforce.

Best Scientists Citing Daniel S. Katz

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles