World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
101
Citations
39997
World Ranking
595
National Ranking
379

Medicine

D-Index
101
Citations
39895
World Ranking
7941
National Ranking
4128

Mark Zimmerman publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark Zimmerman sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 344 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 34 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–705 publications: 5 scientists 706+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 706+

This scientist: 534 publications — 98th percentile

98% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 706 publications or more.

Mark Zimmerman D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark Zimmerman sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 559 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 87 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 79 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 101 D-Index — 95th percentile

95% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mark Zimmerman is affiliated with Brown University in the United States. Their predominant field of study is psychology, with a specific focus on clinical psychology. Additional subfields include experimental and cognitive psychology, applied psychology, pharmacology, and public health, environmental and occupational health. Their research spans a range of mental health topics, including anxiety, depression, psychometrics, treatment modalities, and cognitive processes.

Their work frequently addresses personality disorders and psychopathology, mental health research topics, as well as child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development. Research efforts also include psychotherapy techniques and applications, digital mental health interventions, and mindfulness and compassion interventions.

Zimmerman has contributed articles to several academic venues, often publishing in the following journals:

  • Annals of Clinical Psychiatry
  • Psychiatry Research
  • The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
  • Journal of Personality Disorders
  • Assessment

Recent papers authored or coauthored by Zimmerman include the following:

  • Telehealth Treatment of Patients With Borderline Personality Disorder in a Partial Hospital Setting During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Comparative Safety, Patient Satisfaction, and Effectiveness of In-Person Treatment (2021, Journal of Personality Disorders)
  • Patient satisfaction with partial hospital telehealth treatment during the COVID-19 pandemic: Comparison to in-person treatment (2021, Psychiatry Research)
  • Telehealth treatment of patients with major depressive disorder during the COVID-19 pandemic: Comparative safety, patient satisfaction, and effectiveness to prepandemic in-person treatment (2022, Journal of Affective Disorders)

Zimmerman has collaborated frequently with several researchers, including:

  • Joseph M. Diehl
  • Catherine D'Avanzato
  • Justine S. Thompson
  • Madeline Ward
  • Julianne G. Wilner

Best Publications

  • The Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP): A Dimensional Alternative to Traditional Nosologies

    Roman Kotov;Robert F. Krueger;David Watson;Thomas M. Achenbach

  • Severity classification on the Hamilton depression rating scale

    Mark Zimmerman;Jennifer H. Martinez;Diane Young;Iwona Chelminski

  • The prevalence of DSM-IV personality disorders in psychiatric outpatients.

    Mark Zimmerman;Louis Rothschild;Iwona Chelminski

  • Diagnosing Personality Disorders: A Review of Issues and Research Methods

    Mark Zimmerman

  • DSM-III Personality Disorder Diagnoses in a Nonpatient Sample: Demographic Correlates and Comorbidity

    Mark Zimmerman;William Coryell

  • Childhood emotional, physical, and sexual abuse, and diagnoses of depressive and anxiety disorders in adult psychiatric outpatients

    Brandon E. Gibb;Iwona Chelminski;Mark Zimmerman

  • A Structured Interview for the DSM-III Personality Disorders: A Preliminary Report

    Dalene Stangl;Bruce Pfohl;Mark Zimmerman;Wayne Bowers

  • How should remission from depression be defined? The depressed patient's perspective.

    Mark Zimmerman;Joseph B. McGlinchey;Michael A. Posternak;Michael Friedman

  • Axis I diagnostic comorbidity and borderline personality disorder

    Mark Zimmerman;Jill I Mattia

  • Are Subjects in Pharmacological Treatment Trials of Depression Representative of Patients in Routine Clinical Practice

    Mark Zimmerman;Jill I. Mattia;Michael A. Posternak

  • A Self-Report Scale to Diagnose Major Depressive Disorder

    Mark Zimmerman;William Coryell;Caryn Corenthal;Sheila Wilson

  • A self-report scale to help make psychiatric diagnoses : The Psychiatric Diagnostic Screening Questionnaire

    Mark Zimmerman;Jill I. Mattia

  • Clinical correlates of self-mutilation in a sample of general psychiatric patients.

    Caron Zlotnick;Jill I. Mattia;Mark Zimmerman

  • The Psychiatric Diagnostic Screening Questionnaire: development, reliability and validity.

    Mark Zimmerman;Jill I. Mattia

  • Psychiatric diagnosis in clinical practice: Is comorbidity being missed?

    Mark Zimmerman;Jill I Mattia

  • New dimensions in the quantitative classification of mental illness.

    Roman Kotov;Camilo J. Ruggero;Robert F. Krueger;David Watson

  • Diagnosing Personality Disorders in the Community: A Comparison of Self-report and Interview Measures

    Mark Zimmerman;William H. Coryell

  • The Inventory to Diagnose Depression (IDD): a self-report scale to diagnose major depressive disorder.

    Mark Zimmerman;William Coryell

  • The implications of DSM-III personality disorders for patients with major depression

    Bruce Pfohl;Dalene Stangl;Mark Zimmerman

  • The clinical characterization of the adult patient with depression aimed at personalization of management

    Mario Maj;Dan J. Stein;Gordon Parker;Mark Zimmerman

  • Does “subthreshold” posttraumatic stress disorder have any clinical relevance?

    Caron Zlotnick;C.Laurel Franklin;Mark Zimmerman

Frequent Co-Authors

Iwona Chelminski
Iwona Chelminski Brown University
Kristy Dalrymple
Kristy Dalrymple Brown University
William Coryell
William Coryell University of Iowa
Bruce Pfohl
Bruce Pfohl University of Iowa
Camilo J. Ruggero
Camilo J. Ruggero University of North Texas
Lara A. Ray
Lara A. Ray University of California, Los Angeles
David Watson
David Watson University of Notre Dame
Roger S. McIntyre
Roger S. McIntyre University of Toronto
Brandon A. Gaudiano
Brandon A. Gaudiano Brown University
Roman Kotov
Roman Kotov Stony Brook University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in psychology opens the door to a diverse range of careers, especially in counseling and mental health services. Many students are drawn to specialized fields, such as substance abuse counseling, where demand continues to grow nationwide.

Each location in the U.S. has unique educational and certification requirements for aspiring professionals. For example, those interested in becoming a substance abuse counselor in Norfolk must meet specific state guidelines, balancing both coursework and supervised experience. If you are considering working in Nevada, it’s vital to research North Las Vegas substance abuse counselor certification requirements to understand the licensing process and eligibility.

Similarly, the pathway to this career in California is described in the substance abuse counselor requirements in Oakland, where local regulations may affect your course choices. For those seeking opportunities in the Midwest, consider learning how to become a substance abuse counselor in Oklahoma City to better align your degree and career goals with regional standards.

Choosing the right online degree and understanding varying state requirements are crucial steps toward a rewarding psychology career.

Best Scientists Citing Mark Zimmerman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles