World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
117
Citations
57094
World Ranking
4173
National Ranking
2288

Psychology

D-Index
117
Citations
56890
World Ranking
290
National Ranking
183

William Coryell publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William Coryell sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 459 publications — 96th percentile

96% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

William Coryell D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William Coryell sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 117 D-Index — 98th percentile

98% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

William Coryell is affiliated with the University of Iowa in the United States. Their research contributions span multiple facets of medicine and psychology, with a particular focus on psychiatry and mental health as well as clinical psychology.

Their recent work includes studies published in prominent academic venues, addressing crucial topics in mental health and neuropsychiatry. Notable papers authored or co-authored by William Coryell are:

  • Variation in Suicide Risk among Subgroups of Sexual and Gender Minority College Students (2020), published in Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior
  • Targeting the coronavirus nucleocapsid protein through GSK-3 inhibition (2021), published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Sociodemographic differences in barriers to mental health care among college students at elevated suicide risk (2020), published in Journal of Affective Disorders
  • The association between lithium use and neurocognitive performance in patients with bipolar disorder (2020), published in Neuropsychopharmacology
  • Circadian rhythms in bipolar disorder patient-derived neurons predict lithium response: preliminary studies (2021), published in Molecular Psychiatry

William Coryell frequently publishes in venues such as:

  • Journal of Affective Disorders
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Molecular Psychiatry
  • Bipolar Disorders
  • Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior

Their research fields include:

  • Medicine
  • Psychology

Within these fields, their work focuses strongly on subfields such as:

  • Psychiatry and Mental Health
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Genetics
  • Social Psychology
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

The main topics of William Coryell's research cover:

  • Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
  • Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
  • Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies
  • Circadian Rhythm and Melatonin
  • Psychological and Temporal Perspectives Research

William Coryell has collaborated extensively with several coauthors, frequently working with:

  • Wade H. Berrettini
  • John I. Nürnberger
  • Mark A. Frye
  • Elliot S. Gershon
  • John R. Kelsoe

Best Publications

  • Genetic relationship between five psychiatric disorders estimated from genome-wide SNPs

    S. Hong Lee;Stephan Ripke;Stephan Ripke;Benjamin M. Neale;Benjamin M. Neale;Stephen V. Faraone

  • Genome-wide association study identifies 30 loci associated with bipolar disorder

    Eli A. Stahl;Eli A. Stahl;Gerome Breen;Andreas J. Forstner;Andrew McQuillin

  • A prospective investigation of the natural history of the long-term weekly symptomatic status of bipolar II disorder.

    Lewis L. Judd;Hagop S. Akiskal;Pamela J. Schettler;William Coryell

  • Large-scale genome-wide association analysis of bipolar disorder identifies a new susceptibility locus near ODZ4

    Pamela Sklar;Pamela Sklar;Stephan Ripke;Stephan Ripke;Laura J. Scott;Ole A. Andreassen

  • Recurrence After Recovery From Major Depressive Disorder During 15 Years of Observational Follow-Up

    Timothy I. Mueller;Andrew C. Leon;Martin B. Keller;David A. Solomon

  • A mega-analysis of genome-wide association studies for major depressive disorder

    Stephan Ripke;Naomi R Wray;Cathryn M Lewis;Steven P Hamilton

  • Time to recovery, chronicity, and levels of psychopathology in major depression. A 5-year prospective follow-up of 431 subjects

    Martin B. Keller;Philip W. Lavori;Philip W. Lavori;Timothy I. Mueller;Timothy I. Mueller;Jean Endicott;Jean Endicott

  • Multiple recurrences of major depressive disorder.

    Solomon Da;Keller Mb;Leon Ac;Mueller Ti

  • A prospective 12-year study of subsyndromal and syndromal depressive symptoms in unipolar major depressive disorders.

    Lewis L. Judd;Hagop S. Akiskal;Jack D. Maser;Pamela J. Zeller

  • The enduring psychosocial consequences of mania and depression.

    William Coryell;William Scheftner;Martin Keller;Jean Endicott

  • Switching from 'unipolar' to bipolar II. An 11-year prospective study of clinical and temperamental predictors in 559 patients.

    Hagop S. Akiskal;Jack D. Maser;Pamela J. Zeller;Jean Endicott

  • Major depressive disorder: A prospective study of residual subthreshold depressive symptoms as predictor of rapid relapse

    Lewis L Judd;Hagop S Akiskal;Jack D Maser;Pamela J Zeller

  • Psychosocial Disability During the Long-term Course of Unipolar Major Depressive Disorder

    Lewis L. Judd;Hagop S. Akiskal;Pamela J. Zeller;Martin Paulus

  • Psychosocial Disability in the Course of Bipolar I and II Disorders A Prospective, Comparative, Longitudinal Study

    Lewis L. Judd;Hagop S. Akiskal;Pamela J. Schettler;Jean Endicott

  • Genomic Dissection of Bipolar Disorder and Schizophrenia, Including 28 Subphenotypes

    Douglas M. Ruderfer;Stephan Ripke;Stephan Ripke;Stephan Ripke;Andrew McQuillin;James Boocock

  • The family history approach to diagnosis. How useful is it

    Nancy C Andreasen;John Rice;Jean Endicott;Jean Endicott;Theodore Reich;Theodore Reich

  • Psychiatric genome-wide association study analyses implicate neuronal, immune and histone pathways

    Colm O'Dushlaine;Lizzy Rossin;Phil H. Lee;Laramie Duncan;Laramie Duncan

  • DSM-III Personality Disorder Diagnoses in a Nonpatient Sample: Demographic Correlates and Comorbidity

    Mark Zimmerman;William Coryell

  • Genomewide association studies: history, rationale, and prospects for psychiatric disorders.

    Sven Cichon;Nick Craddock;Mark Daly;Mark Daly;Stephen V. Faraone

  • Premorbid Personality Assessments of First Onset of Major Depression

    Robert M. A. Hirschfeld;Gerald L. Klerman;Philip Lavori;Martin B. Keller

  • A mega-analysis of genome-wide association studies for major depressive disorder

    S. Ripke;N. R. Wray;C. M. Lewis;S. P. Hamilton

Frequent Co-Authors

Martin B. Keller
Martin B. Keller Brown University
Jean Endicott
Jean Endicott Columbia University
Mark Zimmerman
Mark Zimmerman Brown University
John R. Kelsoe
John R. Kelsoe University of California, San Diego
Melvin G. McInnis
Melvin G. McInnis University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Andrew C. Leon
Andrew C. Leon Cornell University
Jess G. Fiedorowicz
Jess G. Fiedorowicz University of Ottawa
John I. Nurnberger
John I. Nurnberger Indiana University
Elliot S. Gershon
Elliot S. Gershon University of Chicago
Peter P. Zandi
Peter P. Zandi Johns Hopkins University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing an online psychology degree in the USA opens up diverse career pathways, including roles in counseling, therapy, and social work. Social work is a popular choice for psychology graduates who wish to make a direct impact in their communities. However, each state has unique education and licensing requirements for becoming a social worker.

For instance, if you’re interested in learning how to become a social worker in New York, you’ll need to complete specific educational programs and pass state-mandated exams. Similarly, understanding the North Carolina social work education requirements is vital if you want to work in that state.

Other states, such as North Dakota and Ohio, also have unique pathways. Prospective professionals should familiarize themselves with the North Dakota social work license requirements or the Ohio social work license requirements, based on where they plan to practice. Carefully reviewing each state’s requirements ensures you are prepared for a wide range of career opportunities in the growing field of psychology and social services.

Best Scientists Citing William Coryell

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles