World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Best Female Scientists
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Best Female Scientists

D-Index
134
Citations
99873
World Ranking
289
National Ranking
181

Medicine

D-Index
136
Citations
100639
World Ranking
1938
National Ranking
1101

Jean Endicott publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jean Endicott sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 425 publications — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Jean Endicott D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jean Endicott sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 136 D-Index — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Best Female Scientists Award

Overview

Jean Endicott is a researcher affiliated with Columbia University in the United States. Their work primarily spans the field of Medicine, with a focus on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, and Pharmacology as key subfields of study.

The main topics addressed in Endicott's research involve Menstrual Health and Disorders as well as Healthcare and Venom Research.

Their recent publication record includes the paper titled ISPMD consensus on the management of premenstrual disorders, published in 2020 in UNC Libraries.

Frequent collaborators in their research include:

  • Tracy Nevatte
  • Patrick O'Brien
  • Torbjörn Bäckström
  • Candace Brown
  • Lorraine Dennerstein

Endicott has contributed to the body of knowledge primarily through publication in UNC Libraries, which is noted as their frequent publication venue.

Best Publications

  • A Diagnostic Interview: The Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia

    Jean Endicott;Robert L. Spitzer

  • Research diagnostic criteria: Rationale and reliability.

    Robert L. Spitzer;Jean Endicott;Eli Robins

  • The Global Assessment Scale: A procedure for measuring overall severity of psychiatric disturbance.

    Jean Endicott;Robert L. Spitzer;Joseph L. Fleiss;Jacob Cohen

  • The long-term natural history of the weekly symptomatic status of bipolar I disorder.

    Lewis L. Judd;Hagop S. Akiskal;Pamela J. Schettler;Jean Endicott

  • Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire: A New Measure.

    Jean Endicott;John Nee;Wilma Harrison;Richard Blumenthal

  • The Longitudinal Interval Follow-up Evaluation. A comprehensive method for assessing outcome in prospective longitudinal studies

    Martin B. Keller;Philip W. Lavori;Barbara Friedman;Eileen Nielsen

  • The Family History Method Using Diagnostic Criteria: Reliability and Validity

    Nancy C. Andreasen;Jean Endicott;Robert L. Spitzer;George Winokur

  • The Overt Aggression Scale for the objective rating of verbal and physical aggression.

    Stuart C. Yudofsky;Jonathan M. Silver;Wynn Jackson;Jean Endicott

  • A prospective investigation of the natural history of the long-term weekly symptomatic status of bipolar II disorder.

    Lewis L. Judd;Hagop S. Akiskal;Pamela J. Schettler;William Coryell

  • Assessment of insight in psychosis.

    Xavier F. Amador;David H. Strauss;Scott A. Yale;Michael M. Flaum

  • The National Depressive and Manic-Depressive Association consensus statement on the undertreatment of depression

    Robert M.A. Hirschfeld;Martin B. Keller;Susan Panico;Bernard S. Arons

  • Recurrence After Recovery From Major Depressive Disorder During 15 Years of Observational Follow-Up

    Timothy I. Mueller;Andrew C. Leon;Martin B. Keller;David A. Solomon

  • Time to recovery, chronicity, and levels of psychopathology in major depression. A 5-year prospective follow-up of 431 subjects

    Martin B. Keller;Philip W. Lavori;Philip W. Lavori;Timothy I. Mueller;Timothy I. Mueller;Jean Endicott;Jean Endicott

  • Quality-of-life impairment in depressive and anxiety disorders.

    Mark Hyman Rapaport;Cathryn Clary;Rana Fayyad;Jean Endicott

  • Multiple recurrences of major depressive disorder.

    Solomon Da;Keller Mb;Leon Ac;Mueller Ti

  • Research diagnostic criteria.

    Robert L. Spitzer;Jean Endicott;Janet B. W. Williams

  • A prospective 12-year study of subsyndromal and syndromal depressive symptoms in unipolar major depressive disorders.

    Lewis L. Judd;Hagop S. Akiskal;Jack D. Maser;Pamela J. Zeller

  • The enduring psychosocial consequences of mania and depression.

    William Coryell;William Scheftner;Martin Keller;Jean Endicott

  • Switching from 'unipolar' to bipolar II. An 11-year prospective study of clinical and temperamental predictors in 559 patients.

    Hagop S. Akiskal;Jack D. Maser;Pamela J. Zeller;Jean Endicott

  • Research diagnostic criteria.

    R L Spitzer;J Endicott;E Robins

Frequent Co-Authors

Martin B. Keller
Martin B. Keller Brown University
William Coryell
William Coryell University of Iowa
Andrew C. Leon
Andrew C. Leon Cornell University
Hagop S. Akiskal
Hagop S. Akiskal University of California, San Diego
Nancy C. Andreasen
Nancy C. Andreasen University of Iowa
Deborah S. Hasin
Deborah S. Hasin Columbia University
Uriel Halbreich
Uriel Halbreich University at Buffalo, State University of New York
Philip W. Lavori
Philip W. Lavori Stanford University
Jess G. Fiedorowicz
Jess G. Fiedorowicz University of Ottawa
Jacob Cohen
Jacob Cohen New York University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in medicine opens doors to many allied health and administrative fields. For registered nurses, advancing skills and scope of practice is possible through specialized degrees, such as rn to fnp bridge programs. These programs enable RNs to become Family Nurse Practitioners and provide more comprehensive patient care.

Nutrition is another crucial area in healthcare. For those interested in dietetics or wellness counseling, top online nutrition degree programs offer flexibility and solid academic foundation for professional growth.

Leadership roles in healthcare also require advanced education. If you aspire to manage healthcare organizations, consider cahme accredited online healthcare administration programs, which meet high industry standards and build essential administrative skills.

Additionally, RNs can further their education at a pace that fits their schedule with online rn to bsn programs no clinicals. These programs allow nurses to earn their Bachelor of Science in Nursing online without the need for on-site clinicals.

Best Scientists Citing Jean Endicott

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles