World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
41
Citations
15483
World Ranking
8582
National Ranking
3675

Candace L. Sidner publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Candace L. Sidner sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 123 publications — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Candace L. Sidner D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Candace L. Sidner sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1991 - Fellow of the Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI)

Overview

Candace L. Sidner is affiliated with Worcester Polytechnic Institute in the United States. Their research work includes a contribution to the publication titled Index, released in 2024 through The MIT Press eBooks. This paper was authored alongside Michael Shayer and published as part of this venue's offerings.

The primary publication venue associated with Candace L. Sidner is:

  • The MIT Press eBooks

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Sidner include:

  • Michael Shayer
  • Janna Quitney Anderson
  • Lee Rainie
  • Emily A. Vogels
  • David Baker

Candace L. Sidner was awarded Fellow of the Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI) in 1991, recognizing their contributions within the field of artificial intelligence.

Best Publications

  • Attention, intentions, and the structure of discourse

    Barbara J. Grosz;Candace L. Sidner

  • Email overload: exploring personal information management of email

    Steve Whittaker;Candace Sidner

  • Plans for Discourse

    Barbara J Grosz;Candace L Sidner

  • Explorations in engagement for humans and robots

    Candace L. Sidner;Christopher Lee;Cory D. Kidd;Neal Lesh

  • Focusing in the comprehension of definite anaphora

    C Sidner

  • Attention, intention, and the structure of discourse

    Barbara J. Grosz;C.L. Sidner

  • Towards a Computational Theory of Definite Anaphora Comprehension in English Discourse

    Candace L Sidner

  • COLLAGEN: A Collaboration Manager for Software Interface Agents

    Charles Rich;Candace L. Sidner

  • Where to look: a study of human-robot engagement

    Candace L. Sidner;Cory D. Kidd;Christopher Lee;Neal Lesh

  • Collagen: applying collaborative discourse theory to human-computer interaction

    Charles Rich;Candace L. Sidner;Neal Lesh

  • Non-Verbal Cues for Discourse Structure

    Justine Cassell;Yukiko Nakano;Timothy W. Bickmore;Candace L. Sidner

  • COLLAGEN: when agents collaborate with people

    Charles Rich;Candace L. Sidner

  • Automated interventions for multiple health behaviors using conversational agents.

    Timothy W. Bickmore;Daniel Schulman;Candace Sidner

  • Focusing for interpretation of pronouns

    Candace L. Sidner

  • Using plan recognition in human-computer collaboration

    Neal Lesh;Charles Rich;Candace L. Sidner

  • Designing relational agents as long term social companions for older adults

    Laura Pfeifer Vardoulakis;Lazlo Ring;Barbara Barry;Candace L. Sidner

  • An artificial discourse language for collaborative negotiation

    Candace L. Sidner

  • A reusable framework for health counseling dialogue systems based on a behavioral medicine ontology

    Timothy W. Bickmore;Daniel Schulman;Candace L. Sidner

  • Contextual recognition of head gestures

    Louis-Philippe Morency;Candace Sidner;Christopher Lee;Trevor Darrell

  • TeleNotes: managing lightweight interactions in the desktop

    Steve Whittaker;Jerry Swanson;Jakov Kucan;Candy Sidner

  • Recognizing engagement in human-robot interaction

    Charles Rich;Brett Ponsleur;Aaron Holroyd;Candace L. Sidner

Frequent Co-Authors

Charles Rich
Charles Rich Worcester Polytechnic Institute
Timothy Bickmore
Timothy Bickmore Northeastern University
Neal Lesh
Neal Lesh Dimagi (United States)
Barbara J. Grosz
Barbara J. Grosz Harvard University
Louis-Philippe Morency
Louis-Philippe Morency Carnegie Mellon University
Sonia Chernova
Sonia Chernova Georgia Institute of Technology
Trevor Darrell
Trevor Darrell University of California, Berkeley
James C. Lester
James C. Lester North Carolina State University
Clifton Forlines
Clifton Forlines Draper Labs
Stacy Marsella
Stacy Marsella Northeastern University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying computer science opens the door to a variety of related fields and online degree options in the USA. For those interested in sustainable technology, comparing the environmental engineering degree landscape helps identify programs focused on green innovation and environmental impact.

If you enjoy applying theory to create real-world solutions, you might also consider the cost of a mechanical engineering degree cost—a key factor as you plan your education budget.

For students curious about scientific fundamentals, it’s worth exploring if can you get a physics degree online—many institutions now offer flexible and affordable remote learning options in physics.

The tech industry’s growth has also fueled demand for data-driven professionals. Finding the cheapest data science masters in usa can help aspiring data scientists acquire advanced skills without excessive debt.

Each of these online degree paths aligns closely with computer science, broadening your potential career pathways in today’s technology-driven economy.

Best Scientists Citing Candace L. Sidner

Trending Scientists