World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
31
Citations
5449
World Ranking
13475
National Ranking
5389

Matthew Stone publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthew Stone sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 130 publications — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Matthew Stone D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthew Stone sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 31 D-Index — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Matthew Stone is affiliated with Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey in the United States. Their research primarily falls within the domain of Computer Science, with a focus on subfields such as Artificial Intelligence, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Philosophy, Safety Research, and Applied Mathematics.

Their work covers several main topics, including Natural Language Processing Techniques, Topic Modeling, Multimodal Machine Learning Applications, Ethics and Social Impacts of AI, Advanced Text Analysis Techniques, Speech and Dialogue Systems, and Language and Cultural Evolution.

Recent published papers by Matthew Stone include:

  • 'Beyond Chatbot-K: On Large Language Models, "Generative AI," and Rise of Chatbots-An Introduction', 2024, Critical AI
  • 'Cross-Modal Coherence for Text-to-Image Retrieval', 2022, Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
  • 'The Origins of Generative AI in Transcription and Machine Translation, and Why That Matters', 2024, Critical AI
  • 'Clue: Cross-modal Coherence Modeling for Caption Generation', 2020, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • 'Discourse Coherence, Reference Grounding and Goal Oriented Dialogue', 2020, arXiv (Cornell University)

Frequent coauthors of Matthew Stone include Malihe Alikhani, Baber Khalid, Shahab Raji, Gerard de Melo, and Lauren M. E. Goodlad. Collaboration with these researchers spans several projects, with the highest number of joint works involving Malihe Alikhani.

Stone's publications are distributed across various venues, notably:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Critical AI
  • Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
  • Language Resources and Evaluation
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)

Best Publications

  • Animated conversation: rule-based generation of facial expression, gesture & spoken intonation for multiple conversational agents

    Justine Cassell;Catherine Pelachaud;Norman Badler;Mark Steedman

  • An anthropometric face model using variational techniques

    Douglas DeCarlo;Dimitris Metaxas;Matthew Stone

  • Anaphora and Discourse Structure

    Bonnie Webber;Matthew Stone;Aravind Joshi;Alistair Knott

  • Imagination and Convention: Distinguishing Grammar and Inference in Language

    Ernie Lepore;Matthew Stone

  • Speaking with hands: creating animated conversational characters from recordings of human performance

    Matthew Stone;Doug DeCarlo;Insuk Oh;Christian Rodriguez

  • A Formal Semantic Analysis of Gesture

    Alex Lascarides;Matthew Stone

  • Sentence Planning as Description Using Tree Adjoining Grammar

    Matthew Stone;Christine Doran

  • The Anaphoric Parallel Between Modality and Tense

    Matthew Stone

  • Discourse Relations: A Structural and Presuppositional Account Using Lexicalised TAG

    Bonnie Webber;Alistair Knott;Matthew Stone;Aravind Joshi

  • Microplanning with Communicative Intentions: The SPUD System

    Matthew Stone;Christine Doran;Bonnie L. Webber;Tonia Bleam

  • Coordination and context-dependence in the generation of embodied conversation

    Justine Cassell;Matthew Stone;Hao Yan

  • Modeling the Interaction between Speech and Gesture.

    Justine Cassell;Matthew Stone;Brett Douville;Scott Prevost

  • Against Metaphorical Meaning

    Ernest Lepore;Matthew Stone

  • Dynamic Discourse Referents for Tense and Modals

    Matthew Stone;Daniel Hardt

  • Living Hand to Mouth: Psychological Theories about Speech and Gesture in Interactive Dialogue Systems

    Justine Cassell;Matthew Stone

  • Sentence generation as a planning problem

    Alexander Koller;Matthew Stone

  • TEXTUAL ECONOMY THROUGH CLOSE COUPLING OF SYNTAX AND SEMANTICS

    Matthew Stone;Bonnie L. Webber

  • Discourse and logical form: pronouns, attention and coherence

    Una Stojnić;Una Stojnić;Matthew Stone;Ernest Lepore

  • Abstraction of 2D shapes in terms of parts

    Xiaofeng Mi;Doug DeCarlo;Matthew Stone

  • Modality in dialogue: planning, pragmatics and computation

    Matthew David Stone

  • Human Language Technologies 2007: The Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics; Proceedings of the Main Conference

    Candace Sidner;Tanja Schultz;Matthew Stone;ChengXiang Zhai

  • Visual explanations

    Doug DeCarlo;Matthew Stone

Frequent Co-Authors

Ernie Lepore
Ernie Lepore Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Bonnie Webber
Bonnie Webber University of Edinburgh
Justine Cassell
Justine Cassell Carnegie Mellon University
Aravind K. Joshi
Aravind K. Joshi University of Pennsylvania
Mark Steedman
Mark Steedman University of Edinburgh
Alex Lascarides
Alex Lascarides University of Edinburgh
Norman I. Badler
Norman I. Badler University of Pennsylvania
Catherine Pelachaud
Catherine Pelachaud Sorbonne University
Doug DeCarlo
Doug DeCarlo Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Gerard de Melo
Gerard de Melo Hasso Plattner Institute

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering a future in computer science, there are many online degree options that can help you launch or advance your career. For students eager to graduate quickly and enter the workforce, fastest masters degree online programs offer an accelerated path to specialized IT and computer science roles.

Choosing a program that aligns with market demand is vital. Many of today’s most valuable masters degrees include technology fields that prepare graduates for high-growth careers. However, not everyone needs a master’s to get started—an associate's degree online can pave the way for entry-level tech roles or serve as a stepping stone toward a bachelor’s degree.

Budget is also a concern for many students. Fortunately, there are affordable online colleges that provide flexible, cost-effective pathways into computer science education. Whether you aim for fast-tracked learning, long-term value, or affordable entry points, diverse online study options can help you build your future in tech.

Best Scientists Citing Matthew Stone

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles