World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Mark Eyer

Mark Eyer

Award Badge
Computer Science
Japan
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
43
Citations
4940
World Ranking
8124
National Ranking
109

Mark Eyer publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark Eyer sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 85 publications — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Mark Eyer D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark Eyer sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Computer Science in Japan Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Computer Science in Japan Leader Award

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Operating system
  • The Internet
  • Computer network

The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Multimedia, Limiting, Digital television, Object and Real-time computing. Mark Eyer performs multidisciplinary study in the fields of Multimedia and Selection via his papers. In his papers, he integrates diverse fields, such as Limiting, Bandwidth, Scrambling, Interoperability, Non real time and Internet Protocol.

The study incorporates disciplines such as Session, End user and Television channel in addition to Digital television. His work carried out in the field of Object brings together such families of science as Interactive media and Operating system. His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Television receivers, The Internet, Block and Interactive television.

His most cited work include:

  • Targeted advertising during playback of stored content (227 citations)
  • A method of and apparatus for partitioning, scaling and displaying video and/or graphics across several display devices (178 citations)
  • Elementary stream partial encryption (160 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

Mark Eyer spends much of his time researching Multimedia, Computer hardware, Computer network, Closed captioning and World Wide Web. His work investigates the relationship between Multimedia and topics such as Digital television that intersect with problems in Object, Transmission method and Block. His study on Computer hardware also encompasses disciplines like

  • Control which is related to area like Table,
  • Display device which intersects with area such as HDMI and Frame.

Mark Eyer has researched Computer network in several fields, including Ethernet over PDH, Metadata and The Internet. His Closed captioning study incorporates themes from Data transport and Parsing. His work on Interactive kiosk as part of general World Wide Web research is often related to Service provider and Order, thus linking different fields of science.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Multimedia (20.45%)
  • Computer hardware (18.18%)
  • Computer network (17.05%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2011-2016)?

  • Closed captioning (15.91%)
  • Table (9.09%)
  • Real-time computing (12.50%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

His scientific interests lie mostly in Closed captioning, Table, Real-time computing, Computer hardware and Data transport. His work focuses on many connections between Closed captioning and other disciplines, such as Parsing, that overlap with his field of interest in Computer vision, Rendering and Block. The Real-time computing study combines topics in areas such as Computer network, The Internet and Television receivers.

His studies deal with areas such as Computer program, Virtual channel and Multimedia as well as Computer network. His work in Computer hardware covers topics such as Control which are related to areas like Electronic engineering and Signal. The concepts of his Digital television study are interwoven with issues in Object and Interactivity, World Wide Web.

Between 2011 and 2016, his most popular works were:

  • Receiving apparatus, receiving method, and program (73 citations)
  • Reception apparatus, reception method, transmission apparatus, and transmission method (63 citations)
  • Extensions to trigger parameters table for interactive television (61 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Operating system
  • The Internet
  • Computer network

His primary scientific interests are in Real-time computing, Table, Digital television, Information processor and Section. The various areas that Mark Eyer examines in his Real-time computing study include CPU cache, Computer network, Cache, Block and Transmission. His Table research incorporates themes from Interactive television, Closed captioning, Event, Event based and Identifier.

His work deals with themes such as Interactivity, Multimedia, World Wide Web, Object and Television receivers, which intersect with Digital television. His studies in Television receivers integrate themes in fields like Application server, Transmission method, Session, The Internet and Block. Mark Eyer has included themes like Process, Computer hardware and Audio visual in his Section study.

Best Publications

  • Targeted advertising during playback of stored content

    Peter Shintani;Matthew Chang;Aditya Krishnan;Andrew Proehl

  • A method of and apparatus for partitioning, scaling and displaying video and/or graphics across several display devices

    Harold Aaron Ludtke;Scott D. Smyers;Mark Kenneth Eyer

  • Elementary stream partial encryption

    Brant L Candelore;Robert Allan Unger;Leo M Pedlow;Gregory Mirsky

  • Multiple commercial option in the same time slot

    Matthew Chang;Aditya Krishnan;Andrew Proehl;David Yang

  • User selective advertising

    Fred Zustak;Matthew Chang;Aditya Krishnan;Andrew Proehl

  • Method of and apparatus for handling high bandwidth on-screen-display graphics data over a distributed IEEE 1394 network utilizing an isochronous data transmission format

    Harold Aaron Ludtke;Scott D. Smyers;Mark Kenneth Eyer

  • System and method for distributing auxiliary data embedded in video data

    Mark Eyer

  • Receiving apparatus, receiving method, and program

    Naohisa Kitazato;Yoshiharu Dewa;Yasuaki Yamagishi;Jun Kitahara

  • Selective capture and storage of A/V objects in an interactive multimedia system

    Mark Kenneth Eyer;Aditya Krishnan;Fred J. Zustak;Matthew S. Chang

  • Non-real time push services

    Mark Kenneth Eyer

  • Content scrambling with minimal impact on legacy devices

    James Bonan;Brant L. Candelore;Mark Kenneth Eyer

  • Schema for interests and demographics profile for advanced broadcast services

    Mark Eyer;Yasuaki Yamagishi

  • Server load balancing for interactive television

    Mark Kenneth Eyer

  • Interests and demographics profile for advanced broadcast services

    Mark Eyer

  • System and method for electronic music video download

    Matthew Chang;Aditya Krishnan;Andrew Proehl;David Yang

  • Reception apparatus, reception method, transmission apparatus, and transmission method

    Naohisa Kitazato;Yasuaki Yamagishi;Yoshiharu Dewa;Jun Kitahara

  • Extensions to trigger parameters table for interactive television

    Mark Eyer

  • Reception apparatus, reception method, program, and information processing system

    Naohisa Kitazato;Mark Eyer

  • Creation of video bookmarks via scripted interactivity in advanced digital television

    Mark Eyer

  • Receiver and method for reporting the usage of advanced television services

    Mark Kenneth Eyer

Frequent Co-Authors

Peter Shintani
Peter Shintani Sony (Japan)
Andrew M. Proehl
Andrew M. Proehl Sony (Japan)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA opens doors to a variety of online degrees and diverse career paths. Cybersecurity is a booming field, and enrolling in a cybersecurity masters online can equip you with the skills to protect organizations from digital threats. For those interested in the intersection of technology and the built environment, a construction management degree online cost offers insights into project planning, budgeting, and modern construction technologies.

If law enforcement or forensic technology intrigues you, consider the criminal justice degree online cost to discover how tech is transforming the justice system. Meanwhile, students with an eye for finance and data can benefit from accounting classes online, combining analytical rigor with digital tools.

Each of these pathways highlights how online education can make high-demand fields more accessible. By considering program costs, course flexibility, and career potential, you can chart a path that matches both your interests and your professional goals.

Best Scientists Citing Mark Eyer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles