World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
71
Citations
28206
World Ranking
1739
National Ranking
97

Mark Steedman publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark Steedman sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 297 publications — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Mark Steedman D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark Steedman sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 71 D-Index — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2006 - Member of Academia Europaea
  • 2002 - Fellow of the Royal Society of Edinburgh
  • 1993 - Fellow of the Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI) For contributions to the integration of syntax, semantics, and prosody in human language processing, using the framework of categorial grammars.

Overview

Mark Steedman is affiliated with the University of Edinburgh in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily centers on the field of Computer Science, with a strong emphasis on Artificial Intelligence. Additional areas of specialization include Developmental and Educational Psychology, Language and Linguistics, Computational Theory and Mathematics, and Cognitive Neuroscience.

Their work addresses a variety of topics, including:

  • Natural Language Processing Techniques
  • Topic Modeling
  • Speech and dialogue systems
  • Language Development and Disorders
  • Text Readability and Simplification
  • Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
  • Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism

Steedman has coauthored research extensively with several collaborators, notably:

  • Liane Guillou
  • Omri Abend
  • Louis Mahon
  • Mark Johnson
  • Nikita Moghe

Their publications frequently appear in the following venues:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Computational Linguistics
  • Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing
  • Language Resources and Evaluation
  • Cognitive Science

Significant recent papers authored or coauthored include:

  • "Modeling Structure-Building in the Brain With CCG Parsing and Large Language Models", 2023, Cognitive Science
  • "Sources of Hallucination by Large Language Models on Inference Tasks", 2023, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "A formal universal of natural language grammar", 2020, Language
  • "Cross-lingual Intermediate Fine-tuning improves Dialogue State Tracking", 2021, Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing
  • "Formal Basis of a Language Universal", 2021, Computational Linguistics

Throughout their career, Steedman has been recognized with several awards, including:

  • Member of Academia Europaea (2006)
  • Fellow of the Royal Society of Edinburgh (2002)
  • Fellow of the Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI) (1993), for contributions to the integration of syntax, semantics, and prosody in human language processing, using the framework of categorial grammars

Best Publications

  • The syntactic process

    Mark Steedman

  • Temporal ontology and temporal reference

    Marc Moens;Mark Steedman

  • Proceedings of the 2011 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing

    Christos Christodoulopoulos;Sharon Goldwater;Mark Steedman

  • Animated conversation: rule-based generation of facial expression, gesture & spoken intonation for multiple conversational agents

    Justine Cassell;Catherine Pelachaud;Norman Badler;Mark Steedman

  • Surface Structure and Interpretation

    Mark Steedman

  • Information Structure and the Syntax-Phonology Interface

    Mark Steedman

  • On the order of words

    Anthony E. Ades;Anthony E. Ades;Mark J. Steedman;Mark J. Steedman

  • Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing

    Christos Christodoulopoulos;Sharon Goldwater;Mark Steedman

  • Dependency and Coordination in the Grammar of Dutch and English

    Mark Steedman

  • Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing

    Yonatan Bisk;Siva Reddy;John Blitzer;Julia Hockenmaier

  • Structure and Intonation

    Mark Steedman

  • Combinatory grammars and parasitic gaps

    Mark Steedman;Mark Steedman

  • CCGbank: A Corpus of CCG Derivations and Dependency Structures Extracted from the Penn Treebank

    Julia Hockenmaier;Julia Hockenmaier;Mark Steedman;Mark Steedman

  • Proceedings of the 2015 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies

    Bharat Ram Ambati;Tejaswini Deoskar;Mark Johnson;Mark Steedman

  • The psychology of syllogisms

    Philip N Johnson-Laird;Mark Steedman

  • Example selection for bootstrapping statistical parsers

    Mark Steedman;Rebecca Hwa;Stephen Clark;Miles Osborne

  • Combinatory Categorial Grammar

    Mark Steedman;Jason Baldridge

  • Generating facial expressions for speech

    Catherine Pelachaud;Norman I. Badler;Mark Steedman

  • A Generative Grammar for Jazz Chord Sequences

    Mark J. Steedman

  • Inducing Probabilistic CCG Grammars from Logical Form with Higher-Order Unification

    Tom Kwiatkowksi;Luke Zettlemoyer;Sharon Goldwater;Mark Steedman

  • APML, a Markup Language for Believable Behavior Generation

    Berardina De Carolis;Catherine Pelachaud;Isabella Poggi;Mark Steedman

  • Proceedings of the 2003 conference on Empirical methods in natural language processing

    Michael Collins;Mark Steedman

  • Wide-coverage semantic representations from a CCG parser

    Johan Bos;Stephen Clark;Mark Steedman;James R. Curran

  • Proceedings of the 14th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics

    Tejaswini Deoskar;Christos Christodoulopoulos;Alexandra Birch;Mark Steedman

Frequent Co-Authors

Julia Hockenmaier
Julia Hockenmaier University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Sharon Goldwater
Sharon Goldwater University of Edinburgh
Norman I. Badler
Norman I. Badler University of Pennsylvania
Siva Reddy
Siva Reddy McGill University
Catherine Pelachaud
Catherine Pelachaud Sorbonne University
Stephen Clark
Stephen Clark Cambridge Quantum Computing
Mark Johnson
Mark Johnson Macquarie University
Bonnie Webber
Bonnie Webber University of Edinburgh
Tamim Asfour
Tamim Asfour Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
Luke Zettlemoyer
Luke Zettlemoyer University of Washington

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA opens many doors, including various online degree options. If cost is a concern, there are numerous affordable master's degrees online that emphasize tech and specialized areas like data science or cybersecurity.

For those aiming for leadership positions in IT or tech management, pursuing a phd in leadership and management online can help you develop the skills needed to guide teams and drive innovation in organizations.

If you’re beginning your academic journey or changing careers, consider starting with easy associate degrees that provide foundational skills in IT and computer science. These programs are designed for quick entry into the workforce or for transferring credits to a bachelor’s degree.

For education professionals interested in instructional technology or tech leadership, the most affordable edd programs online can enhance your qualifications with a strong emphasis on digital learning and innovation.

No matter your career ambitions, these online pathways offer flexible and affordable options for advancing in computer science and related tech fields.

Best Scientists Citing Mark Steedman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles