World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
36
Citations
9263
World Ranking
11013
National Ranking
695

Alex Lascarides publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alex Lascarides sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 250 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 560 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 424 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 378 scientists 262–271 publications: 300 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 145 publications — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Alex Lascarides D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alex Lascarides sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 984 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 969 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 765 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 517 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Alex Lascarides is affiliated with the University of Edinburgh in the United Kingdom and has contributed extensively to the field of Computer Science, with a focus on artificial intelligence and related interdisciplinary areas.

Their research spans multiple subfields including:

  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
  • Language and Linguistics
  • Control and Systems Engineering
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Key topics of their work include:

  • Natural Language Processing Techniques
  • Topic Modeling
  • Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Speech and Dialogue Systems
  • Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation
  • Semantic Web and Ontologies
  • Video Analysis and Summarization

Lascarides has authored several papers published in various venues, with notable recent works such as:

  • Understanding focus: Pitch, Placement and Coherence (2020) in Semantics and Pragmatics
  • Interactive task learning via embodied corrective feedback (2020) in Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems
  • Interactive Symbol Grounding with Complex Referential Expressions (2022) in Proceedings of the 2022 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies
  • Dynamic Planning with a LLM (2023) in arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Learning the Effects of Physical Actions in a Multi-modal Environment (2023) in arXiv (Cornell University)

The frequent publication venues where Lascarides's work appears include:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Semantics and Pragmatics
  • Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems
  • Proceedings of the 2022 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies
  • Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence

Their collaborations involve multiple frequent co-authors such as:

  • Emily M. Bender
  • Subramanian Ramamoorthy
  • Rimvydas Rubavicius
  • Gautier Dagan
  • Frank Keller

In addition to journal and conference publications, Lascarides has contributed to academic books, including a publication with Morgan & Claypool Publishers titled Linguistic Fundamentals for Natural Language Processing II (2020).

Best Publications

  • Logics of conversation

    Nicholas Asher;Alex Lascarides

  • Temporal interpretation, discourse relations and commonsense entailment

    Alex Lascarides;Nicholas Asher

  • The semantics and pragmatics of presupposition

    Nicholas Asher;Alex Lascarides

  • DISCOURSE RELATIONS AND DEFEASIBLE KNOWLEDGE

    Alex Lascaridest;Nicholas Asher

  • Pragmatics and word meaning

    Alex Lascarides;Ann Copestake

  • Indirect Speech Acts

    Nicholas Asher;Alex Lascarides

  • Lexical Disambiguation in a Discourse Context

    Nicholas Asher;Alex Lascarides

  • Using automatically labelled examples to classify rhetorical relations: An assessment

    Caroline Sporleder;Alex Lascarides

  • Segmented Discourse Representation Theory: Dynamic Semantics With Discourse Structure

    Alex Lascarides;Nicholas Asher

  • An Algebra for Semantic Construction in Constraint-based Grammars

    Ann Copestake;Alex Lascarides;Dan Flickinger

  • Strategic conversation

    Unknown

  • Questions in Dialogue

    Nicholas Asher;Alex Lascarides

  • A Formal Semantic Analysis of Gesture

    Alex Lascarides;Matthew Stone

  • A Statistical Approach to the Semantics of Verb-Particles

    Colin Bannard;Timothy Baldwin;Alex Lascarides

  • Probabilistic Head-Driven Parsing for Discourse Structure

    Jason Baldridge;Alex Lascarides

  • Default representation in constraint-based frameworks

    Alex Lascarides;Ann Copestake

  • A probabilistic account of logical metonymy

    Maria Lapata;Alex Lascarides

  • Order independent and persistent typed default unification

    Alex Lascarides;Ted Briscoe;Ted Briscoe;Nicholas Asher;Ann Copestake;Ann Copestake

  • Learning sentence-internal temporal relations

    Mirella Lapata;Alex Lascarides

  • Agreement, Disputes and Commitments in Dialogue

    Alex Lascarides;Nicholas Asher

  • Inferring Sentence-internal Temporal Relations

    Mirella Lapata;Alex Lascarides

  • Abducing Temporal Discourse

    Alex Lascarides;Jon Oberlander

  • Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Computational Semantics

    Julie Hunter;Nicholas Asher;Alex Lascarides

  • Proceedings of the 9th SIGdial Workshop on Discourse and Dialogue

    Alex Lascarides;Nicholas Asher

  • Metaphor in Discourse

    Nicholas Asher;Alex Lascarides

Frequent Co-Authors

Nicholas Asher
Nicholas Asher Toulouse Institute of Computer Science Research
Ann Copestake
Ann Copestake University of Cambridge
Jon Oberlander
Jon Oberlander University of Edinburgh
Mirella Lapata
Mirella Lapata University of Edinburgh
Oliver Lemon
Oliver Lemon Heriot-Watt University
Matthew Stone
Matthew Stone Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Verena Rieser
Verena Rieser Heriot-Watt University
Ted Briscoe
Ted Briscoe Mohamed bin Zayed University of Artificial Intelligence
Jason Baldridge
Jason Baldridge Google (United States)
Dan Flickinger
Dan Flickinger Stanford University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing Computer Science in the USA unlocks diverse opportunities across technology and related fields. Many students explore multidisciplinary options, choosing programs that merge their interests in science, systems, and engineering—either as a primary focus or through dual degrees.

Online study has grown in popularity, providing flexibility and affordability. If you’re interested in fast-tracking your education, check out the accelerated cs degree pathways for a quicker transition into the tech workforce. Meanwhile, those looking for cost-effective options in technical specialties might explore the cheapest online master's mechanical engineering programs.

The intersection of computing and environmental sciences is also a promising area. You can see what can you do with an environmental studies degree to learn about roles in green technology, sustainability analytics, and research. Many programs, like environmental engineering degrees online, offer tech-driven courses that can complement your CS background.

Exploring these related online degrees and career pathways ensures you find the best academic and professional fit for your ambitions in the U.S. tech ecosystem.

Best Scientists Citing Alex Lascarides

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles