World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Computer Science
Australia
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 72 1669 1618 48 48 462 21637

Timothy Baldwin publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Timothy Baldwin between 1997 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Timothy Baldwin published across 29 years, from 1997 to 2025, averaging 19.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 45 publications in 2021. 69 of the 558 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1997 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 45. Peak 45 publications in 2021. 1997: 1 publication 1998: 2 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 6 publications 2003: 12 publications 2004: 8 publications 2005: 15 publications 2006: 20 publications 2007: 23 publications 2008: 21 publications 2009: 19 publications 2010: 23 publications 2011: 22 publications 2012: 25 publications 2013: 23 publications 2014: 20 publications 2015: 25 publications 2016: 26 publications 2017: 29 publications 2018: 23 publications 2019: 25 publications 2020: 26 publications 2021: 45 publications 2022: 13 publications 2023: 27 publications 2024: 43 publications 2025: 26 publications
1997 2025

558 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Timothy Baldwin: publications per year, 1997 to 2025
Year Publications
1997 1
1998 2
1999 2
2000 3
2001 5
2002 6
2003 12
2004 8
2005 15
2006 20
2007 23
2008 21
2009 19
2010 23
2011 22
2012 25
2013 23
2014 20
2015 25
2016 26
2017 29
2018 23
2019 25
2020 26
2021 45
2022 13
2023 27
2024 43
2025 26
Total 558
Download as CSV

Timothy Baldwin publications per year - data summary

  • Timothy Baldwin, a Computer Science scholar from University of Melbourne, has 558 publications recorded across 29 years, from 1997 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1997 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2021, with 45 publications.
  • The least productive year with any output is 1997, with 1 publication.
  • The rate of publication averages 19.2 papers per year over the whole span, or 19.2 per year counting only the 29 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 154 publications, 28% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1997-2006: 74 publications (7.4 per year); 2007-2016: 227 publications (22.7 per year); 2017-2025: 257 publications (28.6 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Timothy Baldwin publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Timothy Baldwin sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 462–471 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 462 publications — 91st percentile

91% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421
102–111 420
112–121 497
122–131 544
132–141 555
142–151 609
152–161 559
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583
192–201 519
202–211 508
212–221 490
222–231 437
232–241 423
242–251 408
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335
282–291 320
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77 462
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

Timothy Baldwin publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 14,188 Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 97 ranges running from 32–41 to 991+ publications.
  • Timothy Baldwin, a Computer Science scholar from University of Melbourne, records 462 publications - the 91st percentile of the discipline.
  • 91% of ranked Computer Science scientists score the same or lower than Timothy Baldwin, and about 9% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 202–211 publications range, and Timothy Baldwin ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 142–151 publications, holding 609 scientists (4% of the field).
  • 70% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 272–281 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 991 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Timothy Baldwin D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Timothy Baldwin sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 72–73 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 72 D-Index — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983
34–35 918
36–37 990
38–39 968
40–41 907
42–43 821
44–45 763
46–47 689
48–49 543
50–51 543
52–53 518
54–55 500
56–57 458
58–59 400
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189 72
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Timothy Baldwin D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 14,188 Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 52 ranges running from 30–31 to 131+ D-Index.
  • Timothy Baldwin, a Computer Science scholar from University of Melbourne, records 72 D-Index - the 89th percentile of the discipline.
  • 89% of ranked Computer Science scientists score the same or lower than Timothy Baldwin, and about 11% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 44–45 D-Index range, and Timothy Baldwin ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 36–37 D-Index, holding 990 scientists (7% of the field).
  • 71% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 54–55 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Computer Science in Australia Leader Award
  • 2023 - Research.com Computer Science in Australia Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Computer Science in Australia Leader Award

Overview

Timothy Baldwin is affiliated with the University of Melbourne in Australia. Their research primarily spans the field of Computer Science, with a focus on Artificial Intelligence and related subfields including Information Systems, Safety Research, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, and Sociology and Political Science.

Their research delves into several main topics, notably Topic Modeling, Natural Language Processing Techniques, Text Readability and Simplification, Authorship Attribution and Profiling, Ethics and Social Impacts of AI, Advanced Text Analysis Techniques, and Multimodal Machine Learning Applications.

Timothy Baldwin has published extensively in respected venues. Frequent publication venues include:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics
  • Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing
  • Proceedings of the 2022 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies
  • Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (Schloss Dagstuhl)

Among their notable recent papers are:

  • "IndoBERTweet: A Pretrained Language Model for Indonesian Twitter with Effective Domain-Specific Vocabulary Initialization" (2021), published in the Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing
  • "Factuality challenges in the era of large language models and opportunities for fact-checking" (2024), published in Nature Machine Intelligence
  • "One Country, 700+ Languages: NLP Challenges for Underrepresented Languages and Dialects in Indonesia" (2022), published in the Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers)
  • "IndoLEM and IndoBERT: A Benchmark Dataset and Pre-trained Language Model for Indonesian NLP" (2020), published on arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "Neural factoid geospatial question answering" (2021), published in the Journal of Spatial Information Science

Timothy Baldwin's frequent co-authors include:

  • Jey Han Lau
  • Fajri Koto
  • Preslav Nakov
  • Trevor Cohn
  • Xudong Han

In addition to articles, Baldwin has published a book titled "Automatic Language Identification in Texts" (2024), released by Morgan & Claypool Publishers.

Best Publications

  • Multiword Expressions: A Pain in the Neck for NLP

    Ivan A. Sag;Timothy Baldwin;Francis Bond;Ann A. Copestake

  • Automatic Evaluation of Topic Coherence

    David Newman;Jey Han Lau;Karl Grieser;Timothy Baldwin

  • An Empirical Evaluation of doc2vec with Practical Insights into Document Embedding Generation

    Jey Han Lau;Timothy Baldwin

  • Lexical Normalisation of Short Text Messages: Makn Sens a #twitter

    Bo Han;Timothy Baldwin

  • Machine Reading Tea Leaves: Automatically Evaluating Topic Coherence and Topic Model Quality

    Jey Han Lau;David Newman;Timothy Baldwin

  • langid.py: An Off-the-shelf Language Identification Tool

    Marco Lui;Timothy Baldwin

  • SemEval-2010 Task 5 : Automatic Keyphrase Extraction from Scientific Articles

    Su Nam Kim;Olena Medelyan;Min-Yen Kan;Timothy Baldwin

  • Shared Tasks of the 2015 Workshop on Noisy User-generated Text: Twitter Lexical Normalization and Named Entity Recognition

    Timothy Baldwin;Marie Catherine de Marneffe;Bo Han;Young-Bum Kim

  • Text-based twitter user geolocation prediction

    Bo Han;Paul Cook;Timothy Baldwin

  • SemEval-2017 Task 3: Community Question Answering

    Preslav Nakov;Doris Hoogeveen;Lluís Màrquez;Alessandro Moschitti

  • Automatic Labelling of Topic Models

    Jey Han Lau;Karl Grieser;David Newman;Timothy Baldwin

  • An Empirical Model of Multiword Expression Decomposability

    Timothy Baldwin;Colin Bannard;Takaaki Tanaka;Dominic Widdows

  • How Noisy Social Media Text, How Diffrnt Social Media Sources?

    Timothy Baldwin;Paul Cook;Marco Lui;Andrew MacKinlay

  • On-line Trend Analysis with Topic Models: #twitter Trends Detection Topic Model Online

    Jey Han Lau;Nigel Collier;Timothy Baldwin

  • IndoLEM and IndoBERT: A Benchmark Dataset and Pre-trained Language Model for Indonesian NLP

    Fajri Koto;Afshin Rahimi;Jey Han Lau;Timothy Baldwin

  • Evaluating topic models for digital libraries

    David Newman;Youn Noh;Edmund Talley;Sarvnaz Karimi

  • Geolocation Prediction in Social Media Data by Finding Location Indicative Words

    Bo Han;Paul Cook;Timothy Baldwin

  • Automatically Constructing a Normalisation Dictionary for Microblogs

    Bo Han;Paul Cook;Timothy Baldwin

  • Lexical normalization for social media text

    Bo Han;Paul Cook;Timothy Baldwin

  • Tangled up in BLEU: Reevaluating the Evaluation of Automatic Machine Translation Evaluation Metrics

    Nitika Mathur;Timothy Baldwin;Trevor Cohn

  • Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing

    David Yarowsky;Timothy Baldwin;Anna Korhonen;Karen Livescu

  • Continuous Measurement Scales in Human Evaluation of Machine Translation

    Yvette Graham;Timothy Baldwin;Alistair Moffat;Justin Zobel

Frequent Co-Authors

Trevor Cohn
Trevor Cohn University of Melbourne
Jey Han Lau
Jey Han Lau University of Melbourne
Karin Verspoor
Karin Verspoor RMIT University
Lawrence Cavedon
Lawrence Cavedon RMIT University
Justin Zobel
Justin Zobel University of Melbourne
Alistair Moffat
Alistair Moffat University of Melbourne
Dan Flickinger
Dan Flickinger Stanford University
Diana McCarthy
Diana McCarthy University of Cambridge
Min-Yen Kan
Min-Yen Kan National University of Singapore
Alex W. Hewitt
Alex W. Hewitt University of Tasmania

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying computer science in the USA opens doors to a range of related online degrees and exciting career opportunities. Many students are exploring an accelerated computer science degree online to fast-track their entry into the tech industry. These programs are ideal for learners who want to complete their studies quickly and start building their careers sooner.

For those interested in the intersection of technology and sustainability, pursuing an environmental engineering degree provides a strong foundation to address environmental challenges using engineering principles. Similarly, understanding the mechanical engineering cost of education can help you make informed decisions about your academic investment and future earning potential.

If theoretical science is your passion, consider studying for an online theoretical physics degree. This pathway leads to roles in research, education, and advanced technology sectors. By exploring these related online degree options, you can tailor your academic journey and expand your career pathways beyond traditional computer science roles.

Best Scientists Citing Timothy Baldwin

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles