World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 53 4731 4599 2202 2125 225 14721

Mona Diab publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Mona Diab between 1990 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Mona Diab published across 36 years, from 1990 to 2025, averaging 8.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 25 publications in 2016. 42 of the 292 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1990 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 25. Peak 25 publications in 2016. 1990: 1 publication 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 6 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 1 publication 2004: 3 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 5 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 9 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 21 publications 2013: 16 publications 2014: 20 publications 2015: 14 publications 2016: 25 publications 2017: 9 publications 2018: 10 publications 2019: 20 publications 2020: 11 publications 2021: 14 publications 2022: 21 publications 2023: 9 publications 2024: 19 publications 2025: 23 publications
1990 2025

292 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Mona Diab: publications per year, 1990 to 2025
Year Publications
1990 1
1991 0
1992 0
1993 0
1994 0
1995 0
1996 0
1997 0
1998 0
1999 1
2000 6
2001 0
2002 1
2003 1
2004 3
2005 1
2006 5
2007 8
2008 8
2009 9
2010 8
2011 8
2012 21
2013 16
2014 20
2015 14
2016 25
2017 9
2018 10
2019 20
2020 11
2021 14
2022 21
2023 9
2024 19
2025 23
Total 292
Download as CSV

Mona Diab publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mona Diab sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 222–231 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 225 publications — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421
102–111 420
112–121 497
122–131 544
132–141 555
142–151 609
152–161 559
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583
192–201 519
202–211 508
212–221 490
222–231 437 225
232–241 423
242–251 408
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335
282–291 320
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

Mona Diab D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mona Diab sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 52–53 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 53 D-Index — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983
34–35 918
36–37 990
38–39 968
40–41 907
42–43 821
44–45 763
46–47 689
48–49 543
50–51 543
52–53 518 53
54–55 500
56–57 458
58–59 400
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Mona Diab is affiliated with Carnegie Mellon University in the United States and has contributed extensively to the field of computer science with a focus on artificial intelligence. Their research spans diverse areas such as natural language processing, topic modeling, and multimodal machine learning applications.

The scientist's publication record includes a significant number of works mainly in computer science, emphasizing artificial intelligence and subfields like computer vision and pattern recognition. Their scholarly output also touches on information systems, sociology and political science, and materials chemistry.

Key research topics associated with Mona Diab include:

  • Topic Modeling
  • Natural Language Processing Techniques
  • Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
  • Text Readability and Simplification
  • Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Advanced Text Analysis Techniques
  • Computational Physics and Python Applications

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Mona Diab are:

  • Badr AlKhamissi
  • Xian Li
  • Aslı Çelikyılmaz
  • Naman Goyal
  • Tianlu Wang

The venues where Mona Diab has frequently published include:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Artificial Intelligence Review
  • Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (Schloss Dagstuhl)
  • Journal of Nanoparticle Research
  • Proceedings of the 2022 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies

Selected recent papers authored or co-authored by Mona Diab are:

  • "Analysing Off-The-Shelf Options for Question Answering with Portuguese FAQs," 2022, Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (Schloss Dagstuhl)
  • "Few-shot Learning with Multilingual Language Models," 2021, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "A Review on Language Models as Knowledge Bases," 2022, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "Arabic natural language processing for Qur'anic research: a systematic review," 2022, Artificial Intelligence Review
  • "Toxicity assessment of nanoparticles in contact with the skin," 2022, Journal of Nanoparticle Research

Best Publications

  • SemEval-2017 Task 1: Semantic Textual Similarity Multilingual and Crosslingual Focused Evaluation

    Daniel M. Cer;Mona T. Diab;Eneko Agirre;Iñigo Lopez-Gazpio

  • SemEval-2017 Task 1: Semantic Textual Similarity - Multilingual and Cross-lingual Focused Evaluation

    Daniel Cer;Mona Diab;Eneko Agirre;Iñigo Lopez-Gazpio

  • SemEval-2012 Task 6: A Pilot on Semantic Textual Similarity

    Eneko Agirre;Daniel Cer;Mona Diab;Aitor Gonzalez-Agirre

  • MADAMIRA: A Fast, Comprehensive Tool for Morphological Analysis and Disambiguation of Arabic

    Arfath Pasha;Mohamed Al-Badrashiny;Mona Diab;Ahmed El Kholy

  • SemEval-2016 Task 1: Semantic Textual Similarity, Monolingual and Cross-Lingual Evaluation

    Eneko Agirre;Carmen Banea;Daniel M. Cer;Mona T. Diab

  • SemEval-2015 Task 2: Semantic Textual Similarity, English, Spanish and Pilot on Interpretability

    Eneko Agirre;Carmen Banea;Claire Cardie;Daniel Cer

  • SemEval-2014 Task 10: Multilingual Semantic Textual Similarity

    Eneko Agirre;Carmen Banea;Claire Cardie;Daniel Cer

  • *SEM 2013 shared task: Semantic Textual Similarity

    Eneko Agirre;Daniel Cer;Mona Diab;Aitor Gonzalez-Agirre

  • Automatic tagging of Arabic text: from raw text to base phrase chunks

    Mona Diab;Kadri Hacioglu;Daniel Jurafsky

  • SAMAR: Subjectivity and sentiment analysis for Arabic social media

    Muhammad Abdul-Mageed;Mona Diab;Sandra Kübler

  • FEQA: A Question Answering Evaluation Framework for Faithfulness Assessment in Abstractive Summarization

    Esin Durmus;He He;Mona Diab

  • An Unsupervised Method for Word Sense Tagging using Parallel Corpora

    Mona Diab;Philip Resnik

  • Subjectivity and Sentiment Analysis of Modern Standard Arabic

    Muhammad Abdul-Mageed;Mona Diab;Mohammed Korayem

  • Overview for the First Shared Task on Language Identification in Code-Switched Data

    Unknown

  • Overview for the First Shared Task on Language Identification in Code-Switched Data

    Thamar Solorio;Elizabeth Blair;Suraj Maharjan;Steven Bethard

  • AWATIF: A Multi-Genre Corpus for Modern Standard Arabic Subjectivity and Sentiment Analysis

    Muhammad Abdul-Mageed;Mona Diab

  • Arabic Morphological Tagging, Diacritization, and Lemmatization Using Lexeme Models and Feature Ranking

    Ryan Roth;Owen Rambow;Nizar Habash;Mona Diab

  • Conventional Orthography for Dialectal Arabic

    Nizar Habash;Mona Diab;Owen Rambow

  • The Bible as a Parallel Corpus: Annotating the "Book of 2000 Tongues"

    Philip Resnik;Mari Broman Olsen;Mona T. Diab

  • Modeling Sentences in the Latent Space

    Weiwei Guo;Mona Diab

  • Detecting Hallucinated Content in Conditional Neural Sequence Generation

    Chunting Zhou;Graham Neubig;Jiatao Gu;Mona Diab

Frequent Co-Authors

Owen Rambow
Owen Rambow Stony Brook University
Nizar Habash
Nizar Habash New York University Abu Dhabi
Thamar Solorio
Thamar Solorio Mohamed bin Zayed University of Artificial Intelligence
Julia Hirschberg
Julia Hirschberg Columbia University
Eneko Agirre
Eneko Agirre University of the Basque Country
Daniel Cer
Daniel Cer Google (United States)
Kathleen R. McKeown
Kathleen R. McKeown Columbia University
Rada Mihalcea
Rada Mihalcea University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Janyce Wiebe
Janyce Wiebe University of Pittsburgh
Philip Resnik
Philip Resnik University of Maryland, College Park

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online education can offer flexible and affordable pathways for students interested in computer science and related fields. Many learners pursue data science degrees to gain expertise in a rapidly growing and rewarding sector. These programs often blend foundational computer science with high-demand analytical skills that employers seek.

For those considering engineering careers, understanding electrical engineering online tuition costs can help you compare options and find programs that fit your budget. Online courses typically reduce additional expenses, making high-quality degrees more accessible than traditional on-campus routes.

If you’re looking for fast entry into the workforce, obtaining certifications that pay well can be a smart investment. Many tech-related certifications can be completed quickly and lead to lucrative careers, especially in IT and cybersecurity.

Ambitious students may also be interested in the quickest cheapest masters degree programs. These allow graduates to boost career prospects in less time and at a lower cost, making advanced education more attainable for working professionals.

Best Scientists Citing Mona Diab

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles