World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
67
Citations
22692
World Ranking
2162
National Ranking
1086

Daniel Marcu publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel Marcu sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 165 publications — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Daniel Marcu D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel Marcu sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 67 D-Index — 85th percentile

85% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Daniel Marcu is affiliated with the University of Southern California in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the intersection of computer science and molecular biology, with a particular emphasis on artificial intelligence applications within these fields.

The main fields of study covered in their work include:

  • Computer Science
  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology

Within these areas, Marcu's subfields of expertise encompass:

  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Molecular Biology

Their research addresses several key topics, notably:

  • Topic Modeling
  • Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
  • Natural Language Processing Techniques

Among recent papers authored or co-authored by Daniel Marcu are:

  • NERO: a biomedical named-entity (recognition) ontology with a large, annotated corpus reveals meaningful associations through text embedding, published in 2021 in npj Systems Biology and Applications
  • NERO: A Biomedical Named-entity (Recognition) Ontology with a Large, Annotated Corpus Reveals Meaningful Associations Through Text Embedding, published in 2020 in bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Frequent co-authors in Marcu's work include:

  • Kanix Wang
  • Robert Stevens
  • Halima Alachram
  • Yu Li
  • Larisa Soldatova

Their publications appear predominantly in venues such as:

  • npj Systems Biology and Applications
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Best Publications

  • Statistical phrase-based translation

    Philipp Koehn;Franz Josef Och;Daniel Marcu

  • Domain adaptation for statistical classifiers

    Hal Daumé;Daniel Marcu

  • The Theory and Practice of Discourse Parsing and Summarization

    Daniel Marcu

  • The Rhetorical Parsing of Unrestricted Natural Language Texts

    Daniel Marcu

  • Summarization beyond sentence extraction: a probabilistic approach to sentence compression

    Kevin Knight;Daniel Marcu

  • A Phrase-Based,Joint Probability Model for Statistical Machine Translation

    Daniel Marcu;Daniel Wong

  • What’s in a translation rule?

    Michel Galley;Mark Hopkins;Kevin Knight;Daniel Marcu

  • Search-based structured prediction

    Hal Daumé;John Langford;Daniel Marcu

  • Building a discourse-tagged corpus in the framework of Rhetorical Structure Theory

    Lynn Carlson;Daniel Marcu;Mary Ellen Okurowski

  • Statistics-Based Summarization - Step One: Sentence Compression

    Kevin Knight;Daniel Marcu

  • Scalable Inference and Training of Context-Rich Syntactic Translation Models

    Michel Galley;Jonathan Graehl;Kevin Knight;Daniel Marcu

  • An Unsupervised Approach to Recognizing Discourse Relations

    Daniel Marcu;Abdessamad Echihabi

  • Sentence level discourse parsing using syntactic and lexical information

    Radu Soricut;Daniel Marcu

  • Improving Machine Translation Performance by Exploiting Non-Parallel Corpora

    Dragos Stefan Munteanu;Daniel Marcu

  • From discourse structures to text summaries

    Daniel Marcu

  • The rhetorical parsing, summarization, and generation of natural language texts

    Graeme Hirst;Daniel C. Marcu

  • Fast and optimal decoding for machine translation

    Ulrich Germann;Michael Jahr;Kevin Knight;Daniel Marcu

  • The rhetorical parsing of unrestricted texts: a surface-based approach

    Daniel Marcu

  • Fast Decoding and Optimal Decoding for Machine Translation

    Ulrich Germann;Michael Jahr;Kevin Knight;Daniel Marcu

  • Learning as search optimization: approximate large margin methods for structured prediction

    Hal Daumé;Daniel Marcu

Frequent Co-Authors

Kevin Knight
Kevin Knight University of Southern California
Hal Daumé
Hal Daumé University of Maryland, College Park
Philipp Koehn
Philipp Koehn Johns Hopkins University
Jill Burstein
Jill Burstein Princeton University
Graeme Hirst
Graeme Hirst University of Toronto
Michel Galley
Michel Galley Microsoft (United States)
Raymond Reiter
Raymond Reiter University of Toronto
Shrikanth S. Narayanan
Shrikanth S. Narayanan University of Southern California
Hector J. Levesque
Hector J. Levesque University of Toronto
Panayiotis G. Georgiou
Panayiotis G. Georgiou University of Southern California

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering your future in Computer Science, it’s worth exploring various online degree options and how they can shape your career. For those seeking to enter the workforce quickly, there are several fast degrees online that can help you acquire job-ready skills in a short time.

With the ongoing boom in artificial intelligence, earning ai online degrees can give you specialized expertise and make you highly marketable in today’s tech-driven economy.

It's also important to consider what the future job market holds. Researching the best degrees for the future can help ensure you’re gaining skills in areas with strong growth potential.

If you’re already a graduate and looking to boost your credentials, some of the easiest masters degree to get online can be completed flexibly without sacrificing quality, helping you advance without putting your career on pause.

Best Scientists Citing Daniel Marcu

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles