World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
42
Citations
8215
World Ranking
8324
National Ranking
3571

Jill Burstein publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jill Burstein sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 121 publications — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Jill Burstein D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jill Burstein sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jill Burstein is affiliated with Princeton University in the United States. Their research spans multiple disciplines within the social sciences and computer science fields. The scientist's work frequently addresses subfields such as safety research, language and linguistics, artificial intelligence, health informatics, and education.

The main topics covered in their research include English as a Foreign Language (EFL) and English as a Second Language (ESL) teaching and learning, explainable artificial intelligence (XAI), the applications of artificial intelligence in healthcare and education, ethical and social impacts of AI, writing and handwriting education, creativity in education and neuroscience, and online learning and analytics.

Jill Burstein has published in various academic venues. Frequent publication outlets include:

  • The Journal of Writing Analytics
  • Assessing Writing
  • Frontiers in Education
  • CALICO Journal
  • arXiv (Cornell University)

Selected recent papers authored or co-authored by Jill Burstein are:

  • "Responsible AI for Test Equity and Quality: The Duolingo English Test as a Case Study," 2024, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "From Pen to Pixel," 2024, CALICO Journal
  • "Digital-First Learning and Assessment Systems for the 21st Century," 2022, Frontiers in Education
  • "Across Performance Contexts: Using Automated Writing Evaluation to Explore Student Writing," 2022, The Journal of Writing Analytics
  • "Writing motivation: A validation study of self-judgment and performance," 2021, Assessing Writing

Jill Burstein collaborates regularly with several researchers. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Daniel F. McCaffrey
  • Ben Naismith
  • Steven Holtzman
  • Alina von Davier
  • Guangming Ling

Best Publications

  • Automated Essay Scoring With e-rater® V.2

    Yigal Attali;Jill Burstein

  • Automated Essay Scoring : A Cross-disciplinary Perspective

    Mark D. Shermis;Jill C. Burstein

  • Handbook of Automated Essay Evaluation : Current Applications and New Directions

    Mark D. Shermis;Jill Burstein

  • Stumping e-rater:challenging the validity of automated essay scoring

    Donald E. Powers;Jill C. Burstein;Martin Chodorow;Mary E. Fowles

  • Automated essay evaluation: the criterion online writing service

    Jill Burstein;Martin Chodorow;Claudia Leacock

  • The E-rater® scoring engine: Automated essay scoring with natural language processing.

    Jill Burstein

  • Finding the WRITE stuff: automatic identification of discourse structure in student essays

    J. Burstein;D. Marcu;K. Knight

  • Automated Scoring Using A Hybrid Feature Identification Technique

    Jill Burstein;Karen Kukich;Susanne Wolff;Chi Lu

  • BEYOND ESSAY LENGTH: EVALUATING E-RATER®'S PERFORMANCE ON TOEFL® ESSAYS

    Martin Chodorow;Jill Burstein

  • Automated essay scoring for nonnative English speakers

    Jill Burstein;Martin Chodorow

  • Automated evaluation of essays and short answers

    Jill Burstein;Claudia Leacock;Richard Swartz

  • Criterion SM Online Essay Evaluation: An Application for Automated Evaluation of Student Essays

    Jill Burstein;Martin Chodorow;Claudia Leacock

  • Evaluating Multiple Aspects of Coherence in Student Essays

    Derrick Higgins;Jill Burstein;Daniel Marcu;Claudia Gentile

  • Automated essay scoring

    Jill Burstein;Slava Andreyev;Chi Lu

  • Automated Essay Scoring: Writing Assessment and Instruction

    M.D. Shermis;J. Burstein;D. Higgins;K. Zechner

  • AUTOMATED ESSAY SCORING WITH E‐RATER® V.2.0

    Yigal Attali;Jill Burstein

  • Enriching Automated Essay Scoring Using Discourse Marking.

    Jill Burstein;Karen Kukich;Susanne Wolff;Chi Lu

  • System and method for computer-based automatic essay scoring

    Jill C. Burstein;Lisa Braden-Harder;Martin S. Chodorow;Bruce A. Kaplan

  • The E-rater® Automated Essay Scoring System

    Jill Burstein;Joel Tetreault;Nitin Madnani

  • Using Entity-Based Features to Model Coherence in Student Essays

    Jill Burstein;Joel Tetreault;Slava Andreyev

  • Automated Essay Scoring with e-rater® v.2.0. Research Report. ETS RR-04-45.

    Yigal Attali;Jill Burstein

Frequent Co-Authors

Martin Chodorow
Martin Chodorow City University of New York
Joel Tetreault
Joel Tetreault Yahoo (United Kingdom)
Daniel Marcu
Daniel Marcu University of Southern California
Daniel F. McCaffrey
Daniel F. McCaffrey Educational Testing Service
Judith M. Harackiewicz
Judith M. Harackiewicz University of Wisconsin–Madison
Donald A. Rock
Donald A. Rock Princeton University
Ted Pedersen
Ted Pedersen University of Minnesota
Iryna Gurevych
Iryna Gurevych Technical University of Darmstadt
Charles A. MacArthur
Charles A. MacArthur University of Delaware
Kevin Knight
Kevin Knight University of Southern California

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Interested in expanding your computer science background? Exploring online degree options can open doors to interdisciplinary careers and specialized fields. For those passionate about using technology to solve real-world environmental challenges, several environmental engineering schools online now offer affordable and flexible programs.

If you are fascinated by designing machines and innovative devices, consider pursuing an online degree in mechanical engineering to gain skills that overlap with robotics and automation—a growing area in computer science.

For students who love mathematics and scientific theory, an online bachelor's degree in physics can enhance your analytical abilities and broaden your technical career options.

As data analysis becomes increasingly vital, many computer science students are turning to specialized data science programs that blend statistics, programming, and business insights—opening up lucrative roles in numerous industries.

Best Scientists Citing Jill Burstein

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles