World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
75
Citations
24445
World Ranking
539
National Ranking
257

Daniel F. McCaffrey publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel F. McCaffrey sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 313 publications — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Daniel F. McCaffrey D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel F. McCaffrey sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 75 D-Index — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2006 - Fellow of the American Statistical Association (ASA)

Overview

Daniel F. McCaffrey is affiliated with the Educational Testing Service in the United States. Their work primarily spans the field of Mathematics, with a significant focus on subfields such as Statistics and Probability, Education, and Artificial Intelligence. Additional areas of study include Clinical Psychology and Sociology and Political Science.

Their research covers a range of topics, including:

  • Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
  • School Choice and Performance
  • Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
  • Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
  • Statistical Methods and Inference
  • Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

McCaffrey has contributed to various publication venues, with multiple papers appearing in:

  • Journal of Educational Measurement
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • ETS Research Report Series
  • Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment
  • Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology

Their recent papers include:

  • Writing motivation: A validation study of self-judgment and performance (2021), Assessing Writing
  • Practical challenges in mediation analysis: a guide for applied researchers (2024), Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology
  • Optimizing Implementation of Artificial-Intelligence-Based Automated Scoring: An Evidence Centered Design Approach for Designing Assessments for AI-based Scoring (2022), Journal of Educational Measurement
  • Recommendations about estimating errors-in-variables regression in Stata (2020), The Stata Journal Promoting communications on statistics and Stata
  • Psychometric Methods to Evaluate Measurement and Algorithmic Bias in Automated Scoring (2022), Journal of Educational Measurement

The scientist frequently collaborates with several coauthors, including:

  • Beth Ann Griffin
  • Donna L. Coffman
  • Matthew Cefalu
  • Brian Vegetabile
  • Lane F. Burgette

In addition to journal articles, McCaffrey has several book publications under the RAND Corporation eBooks publisher. The titles include:

  • Toolkit for Weighting and Analysis of Nonequivalent Groups: A Tutorial for the R TWANG Package (2022)
  • Toolkit for Weighting and Analysis of Nonequivalent Groups: A Tutorial on the TWANG Shiny Application for Three or More Treatment Groups (2020)
  • Toolkit for Weighting and Analysis of Nonequivalent Groups: A Tutorial on the TWANG Shiny App for Two Treatments (2020)
  • Toolkit for Weighting and Analysis of Nonequivalent Groups: A Tutorial on the TWANG Shiny Application for Time-Varying Treatments (2021)
  • State-of-the-Art Strategies for Addressing Selection Bias When Comparing Two or More Treatment Groups (2020)

Daniel F. McCaffrey was awarded the Fellow of the American Statistical Association (ASA) in 2006.

Best Publications

  • Propensity score estimation with boosted regression for evaluating causal effects in observational studies.

    Daniel F. McCaffrey;Greg Ridgeway;Andrew R. Morral

  • A tutorial on propensity score estimation for multiple treatments using generalized boosted models.

    Daniel F. McCaffrey;Beth Ann Griffin;Daniel Almirall;Mary Ellen Slaughter

  • Evaluating Value-Added Models for Teacher Accountability. Monograph.

    Daniel F. McCaffrey;J. R. Lockwood;Daniel M. Koretz;Laura S. Hamilton

  • Variations in the Care of HIV-Infected Adults in the United States: Results From the HIV Cost and Services Utilization Study

    M F Shapiro;S C Morton;D F McCaffrey;J W Senterfitt

  • Models for Value-Added Modeling of Teacher Effects.

    Daniel F. McCaffrey;J. R. Lockwood;Daniel Koretz;Thomas A. Louis

  • Evaluating Value-Added Models for Teacher Accountability

    Daniel F. McCaffrey;Daniel Koretz;J. R. Lockwood;Laura S. Hamilton

  • The Care of HIV-Infected Adults in the United States

    S A Bozzette;S H Berry;N Duan;M R Frankel;M R Frankel

  • Have We Identified Effective Teachers?: Validating Measures of Effective Teaching Using Random Assignment

    Thomas J. Kane;Daniel F. McCaffrey;Trey Miller;Douglas Staiger

  • The Intertemporal Variability of Teacher Effect Estimates

    Daniel F. McCaffrey;Tim R. Sass;J. R. Lockwood;Kata Mihaly

  • Health-related quality of life in patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection in the United States: results from the HIV Cost and Services Utilization Study.

    Ron D Hays;Ron D Hays;William E Cunningham;Cathy D Sherbourne;Ira B Wilson

  • Reassessing the Marijuana Gateway Effect

    Andrew R. Morral;Daniel F. McCaffrey;Susan Paddock

  • Does alcohol advertising promote adolescent drinking? Results from a longitudinal assessment

    Phyllis L. Ellickson;Rebecca L. Collins;Katrin Hambarsoomians;Daniel F. McCaffrey

  • Finding chaos in noisy systems

    Douglas Nychka;Stephen Ellner;A. Ronald Gallant;Daniel McCaffrey

  • The Vemont Portfolio Assessment Program: Findings and Implications

    Daniel Koretz;Brian M. Stecher;Stephen P. Klein;Daniel F. McCaffrey

  • Teacher Pay for Performance: Experimental Evidence from the Project on Incentives in Teaching (POINT).

    Matthew G. Springer;Dale Ballou;Laura Hamilton;Vi-Nhuan Le

  • Impact of psychiatric conditions on health-related quality of life in persons with HIV infection

    Cathy D. Sherbourne;Ron D. Hays;John Fleishman;Benedetto Vitiello

  • What Do Test Scores in Texas Tell Us

    Stephen P. Klein;Laura S. Hamilton;Daniel F. McCaffrey;Brian M. Stecher

  • Teacher Pay For Performance: Experimental Evidence from the Project on Incentives in Teaching

    Matthew G. Springer;Laura Hamilton;Daniel F. McCaffrey;Dale Ballou

  • Expenditures for the care of HIV-infected patients in the era of highly active antiretroviral therapy

    Samuel A. Bozzette;Samuel A. Bozzette;Samuel A. Bozzette;Geoffrey Joyce;Daniel F. McCaffrey;Arleen A. Leibowitz;Arleen A. Leibowitz

  • Effectiveness of Cognitive Tutor Algebra I at Scale

    John F. Pane;Beth Ann Griffin;Daniel F. McCaffrey;Rita T. Karam

  • New Inroads in Preventing Adolescent Drug Use: Results From a Large-Scale Trial of Project ALERT in Middle Schools

    Phyllis L. Ellickson;Daniel F. McCaffrey;Bonnie Ghosh-Dastidar;Douglas L. Longshore

  • ISSUE PAPER: What Do Test Scores in Texas Tell Us?

    Stephen P. Klein;Laura S. Hamilton;Daniel F. McCaffrey;Brian M. Stecher

Frequent Co-Authors

Brian M. Stecher
Brian M. Stecher RAND Corporation
Laura S. Hamilton
Laura S. Hamilton RAND Corporation
Rebecca L. Collins
Rebecca L. Collins RAND Corporation
Martin F. Shapiro
Martin F. Shapiro Cornell University
Samuel A. Bozzette
Samuel A. Bozzette University of California, San Diego
Greg Ridgeway
Greg Ridgeway University of Pennsylvania
Grant N. Marshall
Grant N. Marshall RAND Corporation
Dana P. Goldman
Dana P. Goldman University of Southern California
Daniel Almirall
Daniel Almirall University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Marc N. Elliott
Marc N. Elliott RAND Corporation

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens up a variety of online degree options and career pathways. Many students are searching for affordable and flexible programs that fit their schedules and budgets. For those interested in counseling careers, consider the cheapest cacrep-accredited programs online, which ensure high-quality training for future counselors.

If helping families and couples is your passion, you may want to research an accredited marriage and family therapy degree online. Psychology is another popular field, and the availability of a cheap online psychology degree allows students to study human behavior and mental processes affordably.

Social work remains a meaningful pathway for many interested in making a difference in communities. For an easier route to licensure, check out the easiest msw online program. These online degrees prepare graduates for rewarding roles in counseling, advocacy, and human services while offering flexibility and cost-effectiveness.

Best Scientists Citing Daniel F. McCaffrey

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles