World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 35 9326 8934 3344 3098 152 4698

Marco P. Maneta publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Marco P. Maneta between 2003 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Marco P. Maneta published across 23 years, from 2003 to 2025, averaging 6.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 24 publications in 2020. 8 of the 159 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2003 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 24. Peak 24 publications in 2020. 2003: 1 publication 2004: 0 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 2 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 1 publication 2011: 3 publications 2012: 1 publication 2013: 8 publications 2014: 10 publications 2015: 3 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 8 publications 2018: 16 publications 2019: 23 publications 2020: 24 publications 2021: 18 publications 2022: 7 publications 2023: 7 publications 2024: 4 publications 2025: 4 publications
2003 2025

159 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Marco P. Maneta: publications per year, 2003 to 2025
Year Publications
2003 1
2004 0
2005 1
2006 2
2007 4
2008 5
2009 4
2010 1
2011 3
2012 1
2013 8
2014 10
2015 3
2016 5
2017 8
2018 16
2019 23
2020 24
2021 18
2022 7
2023 7
2024 4
2025 4
Total 159
Download as CSV

Marco P. Maneta publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marco P. Maneta sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 151–160 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 152 publications — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539 152
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Marco P. Maneta D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marco P. Maneta sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 35 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163 35
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Overview

Marco P. Maneta is affiliated with the University of Montana in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on environmental science, with extensive contributions to the study of global and planetary change, water science and technology, environmental engineering, ecology, and atmospheric science.

The scientist's research spans various interconnected topics, notably:

  • Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
  • Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
  • Remote Sensing in Agriculture
  • Hydrology and Drought Analysis
  • Flood Risk Assessment and Management
  • Water resources management and optimization
  • Climate change impacts on agriculture

Marco P. Maneta has published in several frequent venues, including:

  • Hydrological Processes
  • Remote Sensing of Environment
  • Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
  • Frontiers in Big Data
  • Nature Communications

Their work includes notable papers such as:

  • "Multispectral high resolution sensor fusion for smoothing and gap-filling in the cloud" (2020) published in Remote Sensing of Environment
  • "Recent Amplified Global Gross Primary Productivity Due to Temperature Increase Is Offset by Reduced Productivity Due to Water Constraints" (2020) published in AGU Advances
  • "Quantifying the effects of land use and model scale on water partitioning and water ages using tracer-aided ecohydrological models" (2021) published in Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
  • "Isotope-aided modelling of ecohydrologic fluxes and water ages under mixed land use in Central Europe: The 2018 drought and its recovery" (2020) published in Hydrological Processes
  • "Critical Zone Storage Controls on the Water Ages of Ecohydrological Outputs" (2020) published in Geophysical Research Letters

Frequent collaborators of Marco P. Maneta include:

  • Doerthe Tetzlaff
  • Chris Soulsby
  • John S. Kimball
  • Aaron Smith
  • Kelsey Jencso

Best Publications

  • Wildfires and climate change push low-elevation forests across a critical climate threshold for tree regeneration.

    Kimberley T Davis;Solomon Z Dobrowski;Philip E Higuera;Zachary A Holden

  • Decreasing fire season precipitation increased recent western US forest wildfire activity.

    Zachary A. Holden;Alan Swanson;Charles H. Luce;W. Matt Jolly

  • The sensitivity of soil respiration to soil temperature, moisture, and carbon supply at the global scale

    Andrew Hursh;Ashley P. Ballantyne;Leila Cooper;Marco Maneta

  • Global Assessment of the Standardized Evapotranspiration Deficit Index (SEDI) for Drought Analysis and Monitoring

    Sergio M. Vicente-Serrano;Diego G. Miralles;Fernando Domínguez-Castro;Cesar Azorin-Molina

  • Complex influences of meteorological drought time-scales on hydrological droughts in natural basins of the contiguous Unites States

    Marina Peña-Gallardo;Sergio M. Vicente-Serrano;Jamie Hannaford;Jorge Lorenzo-Lacruz

  • Regional Crop Gross Primary Productivity and Yield Estimation Using Fused Landsat-MODIS Data

    Mingzhu He;John S. Kimball;Marco P. Maneta;Bruce D. Maxwell

  • EcH 2 O-iso 1.0: water isotopes and age tracking in a process-based, distributed ecohydrological model

    Sylvain Kuppel;Doerthe Tetzlaff;Doerthe Tetzlaff;Doerthe Tetzlaff;Marco P. Maneta;Chris Soulsby;Chris Soulsby

  • A spatially distributed hydroeconomic model to assess the effects of drought on land use, farm profits, and agricultural employment

    M. P. Maneta;M. O. Torres;Wesley W. Wallender;Stephen A. Vosti

  • Multispectral high resolution sensor fusion for smoothing and gap-filling in the cloud

    Álvaro Moreno-Martínez;Álvaro Moreno-Martínez;Emma Izquierdo-Verdiguier;Marco P. Maneta;Gustau Camps-Valls

  • Recent Amplified Global Gross Primary Productivity Due to Temperature Increase Is Offset by Reduced Productivity Due to Water Constraints

    Nima Madani;Nicholas C. Parazoo;John S. Kimball;Ashley P. Ballantyne

  • Plant water content integrates hydraulics and carbon depletion to predict drought-induced seedling mortality

    Gerard Sapes;Beth Roskilly;Solomon Dobrowski;Marco Maneta

  • A Spatially Distributed Model to Simulate Water, Energy, and Vegetation Dynamics Using Information from Regional Climate Models

    M. P. Maneta;N. L. Silverman

  • Water demand and flows in the Sao Francisco River Basin (Brazil) with increased irrigation

    M. P. Maneta;M. Torres;Wesley W. Wallender;Stephen A. Vosti

  • Quantifying the effects of land use and model scale on water partitioning and water ages using tracer-aided ecohydrological models

    Aaron Smith;Doerthe Tetzlaff;Doerthe Tetzlaff;Doerthe Tetzlaff;Lukas Kleine;Lukas Kleine;Marco Maneta

  • Bias in the variance of gridded data sets leads to misleading conclusions about changes in climate variability

    Santiago Beguería;Sergio M. Vicente-Serrano;Miquel Tomás-Burguera;Marco Maneta

  • Satellite data-driven modeling of field scale evapotranspiration in croplands using the MOD16 algorithm framework

    Mingzhu He;John S. Kimball;Yonghong Yi;Steven W. Running

  • What can we learn from multi-data calibration of a process-based ecohydrological model?

    Sylvain Kuppel;Doerthe Tetzlaff;Doerthe Tetzlaff;Doerthe Tetzlaff;Marco P. Maneta;Chris Soulsby;Chris Soulsby

  • Coastal development and precipitation drive pathogen flow from land to sea: evidence from a Toxoplasma gondii and felid host system

    Elizabeth VanWormer;Tim E Carpenter;Purnendu Singh;Karen Shapiro

  • Critical Zone Storage Controls on the Water Ages of Ecohydrological Outputs

    Sylvain Kuppel;Sylvain Kuppel;Doerthe Tetzlaff;Doerthe Tetzlaff;Doerthe Tetzlaff;Marco P. Maneta;Chris Soulsby;Chris Soulsby

  • Isotope-aided modelling of ecohydrologic fluxes and water ages under mixed land use in Central Europe: The 2018 drought and its recovery

    Aaron Smith;Doerthe Tetzlaff;Lukas Kleine;Lukas Kleine;Marco P. Maneta

  • Using SMAP Level-4 soil moisture to constrain MOD16 evapotranspiration over the contiguous USA

    Colin Brust;John S. Kimball;Marco P. Maneta;Kelsey Jencso

  • Continuous spatially distributed simulation of surface and subsurface hydrological processes in a small semiarid catchment

    Marco Maneta;Susanne Schnabel;Victor Jetten

Frequent Co-Authors

Doerthe Tetzlaff
Doerthe Tetzlaff Leibniz Association
Chris Soulsby
Chris Soulsby University of Aberdeen
John S. Kimball
John S. Kimball University of Montana
Wesley W. Wallender
Wesley W. Wallender University of California, Davis
Santiago Beguería
Santiago Beguería Spanish National Research Council
Zachary A. Holden
Zachary A. Holden United States Department of Agriculture
Richard E. Howitt
Richard E. Howitt University of California, Davis
Steven W. Running
Steven W. Running University of Montana
Sergio M. Vicente-Serrano
Sergio M. Vicente-Serrano Spanish National Research Council
Ahmed El Kenawy
Ahmed El Kenawy Mansoura University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in branching out from Environmental Sciences, related online degrees can offer complementary knowledge and skills. An online MPA degrees program, for example, is ideal for those looking to combine environmental expertise with public administration, policy development, and leadership roles in governmental or nonprofit sectors.

If your focus is understanding societal impacts on the environment or resource management, considering an online bachelors in sociology can deepen your perspective on human behavior and social systems.

For professionals aiming to enhance their educational credentials without committing to extensive research, various EdD no dissertation programs are becoming available. These programs focus on applied learning and leadership, ideal for those in educational roles related to environmental awareness and sustainability.

Moreover, exploring the best EdS to EdD programs can provide a clear pathway for educators aiming to advance their qualifications and contribute to environmental education policy and administration.

Best Scientists Citing Marco P. Maneta

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles