World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Social Sciences and Humanities
USA
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 87 229 192 105 89 456 52797
Mathematics 65 373 309 201 154 219 41669

Elizabeth A. Stuart publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Elizabeth A. Stuart between 1971 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Elizabeth A. Stuart published across 55 years, from 1971 to 2025, averaging 10.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 78 publications in 2021. 72 of the 597 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
25 50 75
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1971 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 78. Peak 78 publications in 2021. 1971: 1 publication 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 1 publication 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 0 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 2 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 7 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 14 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 14 publications 2011: 20 publications 2012: 15 publications 2013: 20 publications 2014: 25 publications 2015: 26 publications 2016: 25 publications 2017: 48 publications 2018: 34 publications 2019: 38 publications 2020: 54 publications 2021: 78 publications 2022: 33 publications 2023: 51 publications 2024: 32 publications 2025: 40 publications
1971 2025

597 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Elizabeth A. Stuart: publications per year, 1971 to 2025
Year Publications
1971 1
1972 0
1973 0
1974 0
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 1
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 0
1993 0
1994 0
1995 0
1996 0
1997 0
1998 1
1999 0
2000 0
2001 0
2002 1
2003 2
2004 2
2005 1
2006 7
2007 7
2008 14
2009 7
2010 14
2011 20
2012 15
2013 20
2014 25
2015 26
2016 25
2017 48
2018 34
2019 38
2020 54
2021 78
2022 33
2023 51
2024 32
2025 40
Total 597
Download as CSV

Elizabeth A. Stuart publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Elizabeth A. Stuart sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 454–463 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 456 publications — 97th percentile

97% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19 456
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Elizabeth A. Stuart D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Elizabeth A. Stuart sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 87 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 87 D-Index — 97th percentile

97% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19 87
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Social Sciences and Humanities in United States Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Social Sciences and Humanities in United States Leader Award

Overview

Elizabeth A. Stuart is affiliated with Johns Hopkins University in the United States. Their research spans multiple disciplines including medicine and mathematics, with a strong focus on statistics and probability as well as economics and econometrics. Their work frequently crosses into clinical psychology, general health professions, and public health, environmental and occupational health subfields.

Their main research topics encompass advanced causal inference techniques, health systems, economic evaluations, quality of life, opioid use disorder treatment, COVID-19 and mental health, statistical methods and Bayesian inference, healthcare policy and management, and substance abuse treatment and outcomes.

Elizabeth A. Stuart has contributed research findings to a variety of scientific venues. Frequent publication venues include arXiv (Cornell University), American Journal of Epidemiology, Statistics in Medicine, UNC Libraries, and bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory).

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • American Journal of Epidemiology
  • Statistics in Medicine
  • UNC Libraries
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Recent scholarly papers authored or co-authored by Elizabeth A. Stuart include:

  • "Mental distress during the COVID-19 pandemic among US adults without a pre-existing mental health condition: Findings from American trend panel survey," 2020, Preventive Medicine
  • "Household COVID-19 risk and in-person schooling," 2021, Science
  • "Meaningful associations in the adolescent brain cognitive development study," 2021, NeuroImage
  • "Mental Distress in the United States at the Beginning of the COVID-19 Pandemic," 2020, American Journal of Public Health
  • "Association between psychological resilience and changes in mental distress during the COVID-19 pandemic," 2020, Journal of Affective Disorders

The scientist has collaborated with several frequent co-authors, including:

  • Trang Quynh Nguyen
  • Megan S. Schuler
  • Ian Schmid
  • Emma E. McGinty
  • Elena Badillo-Goicoechea

Elizabeth A. Stuart also has book publications, notably with RAND Corporation eBooks. One such publication is titled State-Level Opioid Policy Analyses: Moving Beyond the Classic Difference-in-Differences Model, released in 2021.

Best Publications

  • Matching Methods for Causal Inference: A Review and a Look Forward

    Elizabeth A. Stuart

  • Matching as Nonparametric Preprocessing for Reducing Model Dependence in Parametric Causal Inference

    Daniel E. Ho;Kosuke Imai;Gary King;Elizabeth A. Stuart

  • MatchIt: Nonparametric Preprocessing for Parametric Causal Inference

    Daniel E. Ho;Kosuke Imai;Gary King;Elizabeth A. Stuart

  • Moving towards best practice when using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) using the propensity score to estimate causal treatment effects in observational studies

    Peter C. Austin;Elizabeth A. Stuart

  • Multiple Imputation by Chained Equations: What is it and how does it work?

    Melissa J. Azur;Elizabeth A. Stuart;Constantine Frangakis;Philip J. Leaf

  • Misunderstandings between experimentalists and observationalists about causal inference

    Kosuke Imai;Gary King;Elizabeth A. Stuart

  • Improving propensity score weighting using machine learning.

    Brian K. Lee;Justin Lessler;Elizabeth A. Stuart

  • Propensity score techniques and the assessment of measured covariate balance to test causal associations in psychological research

    Valerie S. Harder;Elizabeth A. Stuart;James C. Anthony

  • Prognostic score–based balance measures can be a useful diagnostic for propensity score methods in comparative effectiveness research

    Elizabeth A. Stuart;Brian K. Lee;Finbarr P. Leacy

  • Generalizing observational study results: applying propensity score methods to complex surveys.

    Eva H. DuGoff;Megan Schuler;Elizabeth A. Stuart

  • Multiple Imputation: A Flexible Tool for Handling Missing Data

    Peng Li;Elizabeth A. Stuart;David B. Allison

  • Using propensity scores in difference-in-differences models to estimate the effects of a policy change

    Elizabeth A. Stuart;Haiden A. Huskamp;Kenneth Duckworth;Jeffrey Simmons

  • Weight Trimming and Propensity Score Weighting

    Brian K. Lee;Justin Lessler;Elizabeth A. Stuart

  • The use of propensity scores to assess the generalizability of results from randomized trials

    Elizabeth A. Stuart;Stephen R. Cole;Catherine P. Bradshaw;Philip J. Leaf

  • Generalizing Evidence From Randomized Clinical Trials to Target Populations The ACTG 320 Trial

    Stephen R. Cole;Elizabeth A. Stuart

  • Intervention Targeting Development of Socially Synchronous Engagement in Toddlers with Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

    Rebecca J. Landa;Katherine C. Holman;Allison H. O’Neill;Elizabeth A. Stuart

  • Developmental trajectories in children with and without autism spectrum disorders: the first 3 years.

    Rebecca J. Landa;Rebecca J. Landa;Alden L. Gross;Alden L. Gross;Elizabeth A. Stuart;Ashley Faherty

  • A Potential Outcomes View of Value-Added Assessment in Education.

    Donald B. Rubin;Elizabeth A. Stuart;Elaine L. Zanutto

  • Using full matching to estimate causal effects in nonexperimental studies: examining the relationship between adolescent marijuana use and adult outcomes.

    Elizabeth A. Stuart;Kerry M. Green

  • Community Violence and Youth: Affect, Behavior, Substance Use, and Academics

    Michele Cooley-Strickland;Michele Cooley-Strickland;Tanya J. Quille;Robert S. Griffin;Elizabeth A. Stuart

  • BEST PRACTICES IN QUASI- EXPERIMENTAL DESIGNS Matching Methods for Causal Inference

    Elizabeth A. Stuart;Donald B. Rubin

Frequent Co-Authors

Ramin Mojtabai
Ramin Mojtabai Johns Hopkins University
Colleen L. Barry
Colleen L. Barry Johns Hopkins University
Rosa M. Crum
Rosa M. Crum Johns Hopkins University
Miguel A. Hernán
Miguel A. Hernán Harvard University
David S. Salkever
David S. Salkever University of Maryland, Baltimore County
Frauke Kreuter
Frauke Kreuter Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Emma E. McGinty
Emma E. McGinty Cornell University
Marc C. Hochberg
Marc C. Hochberg University of Maryland, Baltimore
Peter C. Austin
Peter C. Austin University of Toronto
Haiden A. Huskamp
Haiden A. Huskamp Harvard University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens doors to a wide variety of online degrees and flexible career tracks. Many students are attracted to fields like psychology and counseling, which offer both personal fulfillment and professional growth.

For those interested in clinical or counseling roles, psyd psychology programs provide advanced training in clinical practice. Alternatively, if you’re seeking a career in relationship therapy, you can explore mft programs that can be completed in a shorter time frame and lead to licensure as a marriage and family therapist.

For students prioritizing affordability, affordable online masters in psychology options make it possible to advance your education without breaking the bank. Those interested in leadership or education-focused careers may consider edd online programs that offer a fast track to doctorate-level qualifications.

Each pathway is designed for flexibility, allowing students to balance studies with work or other responsibilities. Online degrees are increasingly respected by employers and can lead to rewarding positions in education, mental health, research, and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Elizabeth A. Stuart

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles