World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mathematics

D-Index
71
Citations
75078
World Ranking
251
National Ranking
139

Paul R. Rosenbaum publication distribution in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mathematics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul R. Rosenbaum sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 3 scientists 47–51 publications: 5 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 20 scientists 62–66 publications: 14 scientists 67–71 publications: 25 scientists 72–76 publications: 19 scientists 77–81 publications: 35 scientists 82–86 publications: 50 scientists 87–91 publications: 60 scientists 92–96 publications: 86 scientists 97–101 publications: 84 scientists 102–106 publications: 83 scientists 107–111 publications: 90 scientists 112–116 publications: 99 scientists 117–121 publications: 90 scientists 122–126 publications: 91 scientists 127–131 publications: 109 scientists 132–136 publications: 110 scientists 137–141 publications: 98 scientists 142–146 publications: 112 scientists 147–151 publications: 102 scientists 152–156 publications: 88 scientists 157–161 publications: 106 scientists 162–166 publications: 83 scientists 167–171 publications: 102 scientists 172–176 publications: 77 scientists 177–181 publications: 81 scientists 182–186 publications: 78 scientists 187–191 publications: 71 scientists 192–196 publications: 92 scientists 197–201 publications: 64 scientists 202–206 publications: 69 scientists 207–211 publications: 64 scientists 212–216 publications: 62 scientists 217–221 publications: 58 scientists 222–226 publications: 53 scientists 227–231 publications: 50 scientists 232–236 publications: 46 scientists 237–241 publications: 46 scientists 242–246 publications: 46 scientists 247–251 publications: 43 scientists 252–256 publications: 29 scientists 257–261 publications: 45 scientists 262–266 publications: 30 scientists 267–271 publications: 33 scientists 272–276 publications: 34 scientists 277–281 publications: 30 scientists 282–286 publications: 31 scientists 287–291 publications: 21 scientists 292–296 publications: 34 scientists 297–301 publications: 26 scientists 302–306 publications: 10 scientists 307–311 publications: 17 scientists 312–316 publications: 23 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 16 scientists 327–331 publications: 26 scientists 332–336 publications: 13 scientists 337–341 publications: 13 scientists 342–346 publications: 16 scientists 347–351 publications: 17 scientists 352–356 publications: 12 scientists 357–361 publications: 18 scientists 362–366 publications: 18 scientists 367–371 publications: 9 scientists 372–376 publications: 11 scientists 377–381 publications: 8 scientists 382–386 publications: 8 scientists 387–391 publications: 9 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 8 scientists 402–406 publications: 11 scientists 407–411 publications: 6 scientists 412–416 publications: 6 scientists 417–421 publications: 9 scientists 422–426 publications: 8 scientists 427–431 publications: 5 scientists 432–436 publications: 8 scientists 437–441 publications: 8 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 4 scientists 452–456 publications: 4 scientists 457–461 publications: 2 scientists 462–466 publications: 2 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 3 scientists 477–481 publications: 3 scientists 482–486 publications: 6 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 5 scientists 502–506 publications: 1 scientists 507–511 publications: 6 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 1 scientists 522–526 publications: 3 scientists 527–531 publications: 1 scientists 532–536 publications: 4 scientists 537+ publications: 100 scientists
42 publications 537+

This scientist: 255 publications — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more.

Paul R. Rosenbaum D-index placement in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul R. Rosenbaum sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 174 scientists 31 D-Index: 151 scientists 32 D-Index: 174 scientists 33 D-Index: 117 scientists 34 D-Index: 136 scientists 35 D-Index: 127 scientists 36 D-Index: 145 scientists 37 D-Index: 153 scientists 38 D-Index: 150 scientists 39 D-Index: 150 scientists 40 D-Index: 138 scientists 41 D-Index: 136 scientists 42 D-Index: 93 scientists 43 D-Index: 108 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 112 scientists 46 D-Index: 103 scientists 47 D-Index: 75 scientists 48 D-Index: 59 scientists 49 D-Index: 67 scientists 50 D-Index: 60 scientists 51 D-Index: 57 scientists 52 D-Index: 59 scientists 53 D-Index: 62 scientists 54 D-Index: 60 scientists 55 D-Index: 50 scientists 56 D-Index: 42 scientists 57 D-Index: 54 scientists 58 D-Index: 50 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 41 scientists 61 D-Index: 35 scientists 62 D-Index: 40 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 31 scientists 65 D-Index: 27 scientists 66 D-Index: 29 scientists 67 D-Index: 19 scientists 68 D-Index: 25 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 18 scientists 71 D-Index: 12 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 13 scientists 74 D-Index: 18 scientists 75 D-Index: 9 scientists 76 D-Index: 11 scientists 77 D-Index: 10 scientists 78 D-Index: 9 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 10 scientists 82 D-Index: 5 scientists 83 D-Index: 5 scientists 84 D-Index: 13 scientists 85 D-Index: 6 scientists 86+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 86+

This scientist: 71 D-Index — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1992 - Fellow of the American Statistical Association (ASA)

Overview

Paul R. Rosenbaum is affiliated with the University of Pennsylvania in the United States. Their research spans several fields including Mathematics, Medicine, and Economics, Econometrics and Finance. The primary subfields of study are Statistics and Probability, Economics and Econometrics, Management Science and Operations Research, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, and General Health Professions.

The scientist's research topics include:

  • Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
  • Statistical Methods and Inference
  • Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
  • Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
  • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Optimal Experimental Design Methods
  • Healthcare Policy and Management

Recent papers authored or coauthored by Paul R. Rosenbaum cover a variety of themes and publication venues:

  • Evaluating the Costs and Outcomes of Hospital Nursing Resources: a Matched Cohort Study of Patients with Common Medical Conditions, 2020, Journal of General Internal Medicine
  • Valuing hospital investments in nursing: multistate matched-cohort study of surgical patients, 2020, BMJ Quality & Safety
  • Involvement of multinational corporations in social innovation: Exploring an emerging phenomenon, 2022, Journal of Business Research
  • Matching Methods for Observational Studies Derived from Large Administrative Databases, 2020, Statistical Science
  • Alzheimer's Dementia After Exposure to Anesthesia and Surgery in the Elderly, 2020, Annals of Surgery

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Paul R. Rosenbaum include:

  • Jeffrey H. Silber
  • Joseph G. Reiter
  • Dylan S. Small
  • Siddharth Jain
  • Lee A. Fleisher

The scientist has published extensively in a number of venues, with the most frequent including:

  • Journal of General Internal Medicine
  • Journal of the American Statistical Association
  • Statistical Science
  • Biometrics
  • The Annals of Applied Statistics

In addition to journal articles, Paul R. Rosenbaum has contributed to academic books. One forthcoming publication is with Springer International Publishing, titled An Introduction to the Theory of Observational Studies, expected in 2025.

Paul R. Rosenbaum was recognized as a Fellow of the American Statistical Association (ASA) in 1992.

Best Publications

  • The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects

    Paul R. Rosenbaum;Donald B. Rubin

  • Constructing a Control Group Using Multivariate Matched Sampling Methods That Incorporate the Propensity Score

    Paul R. Rosenbaum;Donald B. Rubin

  • Reducing Bias in Observational Studies Using Subclassification on the Propensity Score

    Paul R. Rosenbaum;Donald B. Rubin

  • Design of Observational Studies

    Paul R. Rosenbaum

  • Assessing Sensitivity to an Unobserved Binary Covariate in an Observational Study with Binary Outcome

    P. R. Rosenbaum;D. B. Rubin

  • Invited Commentary: Propensity Scores

    Marshall M. Joffe;Paul R. Rosenbaum

  • Model-Based Direct Adjustment

    Paul R. Rosenbaum

  • Optimal Matching for Observational Studies

    Paul R. Rosenbaum

  • Comparison of Multivariate Matching Methods: Structures, Distances, and Algorithms

    Xing Sam Gu;Paul R. Rosenbaum

  • The Bias Due to Incomplete Matching

    Paul R. Rosenbaum;Donald B. Rubin

  • Covariance Adjustment in Randomized Experiments and Observational Studies

    Paul R. Rosenbaum

  • Interference Between Units in Randomized Experiments

    Paul R Rosenbaum

  • Conditional Association and Unidimensionality in Monotone Latent Variable Models

    Paul W. Holland;Paul R. Rosenbaum

  • Rare outcomes, common treatments: analytic strategies using propensity scores.

    Leonard E Braitman;Paul R Rosenbaum

  • A Characterization of Optimal Designs for Observational Studies

    Paul R. Rosenbaum

  • Mortality among hospitalized Medicare beneficiaries in the first 2 years following ACGME resident duty hour reform.

    Kevin G. Volpp;Amy K. Rosen;Amy K. Rosen;Paul R. Rosenbaum;Patrick S. Romano

  • Sensitivity analysis for certain permutation inferences in matched observational studies

    Paul R. Rosenbaum

  • From Association to Causation in Observational Studies: The Role of Tests of Strongly Ignorable Treatment Assignment

    Paul R. Rosenbaum

  • Combining Propensity Score Matching and Group-Based Trajectory Analysis in an Observational Study.

    Amelia Haviland;Daniel S. Nagin;Paul R. Rosenbaum

  • An exact distribution-free test comparing two multivariate distributions based on adjacency

    Paul R. Rosenbaum

  • Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis.

    Paul R. Rosenbaum;Larry Hedges;Ingram Olkin

  • THE BIAS DUE TO INCOMPLETE HATCHING

    Paul R. Rosenbaum;Donald B. Rubin

Frequent Co-Authors

Dylan S. Small
Dylan S. Small University of Pennsylvania
Donald B. Rubin
Donald B. Rubin Temple University
Lee A. Fleisher
Lee A. Fleisher University of Pennsylvania
Kevin G. Volpp
Kevin G. Volpp University of Pennsylvania
Patrick S. Romano
Patrick S. Romano University of California, Davis
Joseph L. Gastwirth
Joseph L. Gastwirth George Washington University
Amy K. Rosen
Amy K. Rosen VA Boston Healthcare System
Katrina Armstrong
Katrina Armstrong Harvard University
Daniel Polsky
Daniel Polsky Johns Hopkins University
Linda H. Aiken
Linda H. Aiken University of Pennsylvania

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students studying Mathematics in the USA, exploring related online degrees can open doors to diverse career pathways. Many find that integrating business knowledge enhances their career prospects. For example, discovering the easiest mba specialization can provide a manageable pathway to combining analytical skills with leadership abilities.

Moreover, pursuing the easiest mba online offers the flexibility needed for working professionals who want to maintain their careers while advancing their education. This flexibility is crucial for those looking to balance study with other commitments.

For those interested in research and executive leadership, affordable options like the dba programs provide valuable qualifications in business administration at a doctoral level, complementing a strong foundation in mathematical theory.

Additionally, students can consider expanding into financial sectors by exploring the best online masters in finance. This merges quantitative skills with financial expertise, opening up opportunities in investment analysis, risk management, and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Paul R. Rosenbaum

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles