What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
- Ecology
- Habitat
- Predation
Reidar Andersen mainly investigates Ecology, Roe deer, Predation, Eurasian lynx and Habitat.
The various areas that he examines in his Ecology study include Population growth and Population density.
His Predation research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Range, Livestock and Lepus timidus.
The Eurasian lynx study combines topics in areas such as Home range, Interspecific competition, Poor body condition, Animal science and Lagopus.
His research integrates issues of Niche and Multivariate statistics in his study of Habitat.
Reidar Andersen interconnects Seasonality, Vulpes, Total mortality and Negative relationship in the investigation of issues within Capreolus.
His most cited work include:
- Prey density, environmental productivity and home-range size in the Eurasian lynx (Lynx lynx) (200 citations)
- Patterns of self-reported fear towards large carnivores among the Norwegian public (200 citations)
- Factors affecting maternal care in an income breeder, the European roe deer (162 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
His scientific interests lie mostly in Ecology, Roe deer, Predation, Capreolus and Eurasian lynx.
His research links Population density with Ecology.
His biological study deals with issues like Ungulate, which deal with fields such as Wildlife conservation.
His Predation study incorporates themes from Canis and Taiga.
His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Reproductive success, Optimal foraging theory, Mating system, Biological dispersal and Animal science.
His Eurasian lynx study combines topics in areas such as Zoology, Home range, Livestock, Carnivore and Population growth.
He most often published in these fields:
- Ecology (79.27%)
- Roe deer (37.80%)
- Predation (28.05%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2008-2014)?
- Ecology (79.27%)
- Roe deer (37.80%)
- Predation (28.05%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
Reidar Andersen spends much of his time researching Ecology, Roe deer, Predation, Eurasian lynx and Habitat.
Within one scientific family, Reidar Andersen focuses on topics pertaining to Holocene under Ecology, and may sometimes address concerns connected to Cervus elaphus.
Reidar Andersen has included themes like Population density and Predator in his Roe deer study.
As part of the same scientific family, Reidar Andersen usually focuses on Eurasian lynx, concentrating on Range and intersecting with Feliformia.
His Habitat research focuses on subjects like Foraging, which are linked to Spatial heterogeneity.
In his study, Carnivore and Density dependence is inextricably linked to Population growth, which falls within the broad field of Capreolus.
Between 2008 and 2014, his most popular works were:
- What shapes Eurasian lynx distribution in human dominated landscapes: selecting prey or avoiding people? (120 citations)
- A slow life in hell or a fast life in heaven: demographic analyses of contrasting roe deer populations. (101 citations)
- Climate, season, and social status modulate the functional response of an efficient stalking predator: the Eurasian lynx (84 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- Ecology
- Habitat
- Predation
Reidar Andersen mainly investigates Ecology, Eurasian lynx, Roe deer, Predation and Habitat.
His Ecology study frequently draws parallels with other fields, such as Population density.
His Population density research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Semelparity and iteroparity, Intraspecific competition and Demographic analysis.
His Predator study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Trophic level, Abiotic component and Capreolus.
His Animal ecology research includes elements of Range, Abundance and Feliformia.
His work carried out in the field of Disturbance brings together such families of science as Natural selection, Home range and Spatial variability.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
