World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
69
Citations
14433
World Ranking
1467
National Ranking
22

Eivin Røskaft publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eivin Røskaft sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 299 publications — 91st percentile

91% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Eivin Røskaft D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eivin Røskaft sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 69 D-Index — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • Member of the Norwegian Academy of Science and Letters Biology
  • Member of the Norwegian Academy of Science and Letters Biology
  • Member of the Norwegian Academy of Science and Letters Biology

Overview

Eivin Røskaft is affiliated with the Norwegian University of Science and Technology in Norway and focuses primarily on Environmental Science. Their research encompasses various subfields, including Ecology, Global and Planetary Change, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, and Ecological Modeling.

The scientist's work covers several main topics, notably:

  • Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology
  • Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
  • Species Distribution and Climate Change
  • Avian ecology and behavior
  • Primate Behavior and Ecology
  • Economic and Environmental Valuation

Frequent publication venues for their research include:

  • Global Ecology and Conservation
  • Nature Communications
  • Frontiers in Conservation Science
  • Conservation Physiology
  • Human Dimensions of Wildlife

Several recent papers reflect the scope of research activity:

  • "The role of education in biodiversity conservation: Can knowledge and understanding alter locals' views and attitudes towards ecosystem services?" (2022), Environmental Education Research
  • "Factors Influencing Communities' Attitudes and Participation in Protected Area Conservation: A Case Study from Northern Myanmar" (2022), Society & Natural Resources
  • "Applying Multi-Temporal Landsat Satellite Data and Markov-Cellular Automata to Predict Forest Cover Change and Forest Degradation of Sundarban Reserve Forest, Bangladesh" (2020), Forests
  • "Bird tolerance to humans in open tropical ecosystems" (2023), Nature Communications
  • "Pattern and distribution of human-elephant conflicts in three conflict-prone landscapes in Myanmar" (2020), Global Ecology and Conservation

Frequent collaborators include:

  • Peter S. Ranke
  • Roel May
  • Franco Peniel Mbise
  • Robert Fyumagwa
  • Craig R. Jackson

Among notable recognitions, the scientist is a member of the Norwegian Academy of Science and Letters in the field of Biology.

Best Publications

  • Sex Biases in Avian Dispersal: A Reappraisal

    Alice L. Clarke;Bernt-Erik Sæther;Eivin Røskaft

  • Factors influencing conservation attitudes of local people in western Serengeti Tanzania

    Jafari R. Kideghesho;Eivin Røskaft;Bjørn P. Kaltenborn

  • Patterns of self-reported fear towards large carnivores among the Norwegian public

    Eivin Røskaft;Tore Bjerke;Bjørn Kaltenborn;John D.C Linnell

  • Human attitudes towards large carnivores in Norway

    Eivin Røskaft;Barbara Händel;Tore Bjerke;Bjørn P. Kaltenborn

  • Livestock loss caused by predators outside the Serengeti National Park, Tanzania

    Tomas Holmern;Julius Nyahongo;Julius Nyahongo;Eivin Røskaft

  • Large carnivores and human safety: a review.

    Jonny Löe;Eivin Röskaft

  • Life History Variation, Population Processes and Priorities in Species Conservation: Towards a Reunion of Research Paradigms

    Bernt-Erik Sæther;Thor Harald Ringsby;Eivin Røskaft

  • Reduced breeding success in white-tailed eagles at Smøla windfarm, western Norway, is caused by mortality and displacement

    Espen Lie Dahl;Kjetil Bevanger;Torgeir Nygård;Eivin Røskaft

  • Rejection Behavior by Common Cuckoo Hosts Towards Artificial Brood Parasite Eggs

    Arne Moksnes;Eivin Røskaft;Anders T. Braa

  • Constraints on host choice: Why do parasitic birds rarely exploit some common potential hosts?

    Tomáš Grim;Peter Samaš;Csaba Moskát;Oddmund Kleven

  • Adaptations of meadow pipits to parasitism by the common cuckoo

    A. Moksnes;E. Røskaft

  • Coevolution in Action: Disruptive Selection on Egg Colour in an Avian Brood Parasite and Its Host

    Chanchao Yang;Chanchao Yang;Wei Liang;Yan Cai;Suhua Shi

  • The relationship between social status and resting metabolic rate in great tits (Parus major) and pied flycatchers (Ficedula hypoleuca)

    E. Røskaft;T. Järvi;M. Bakken;C. Bech

  • Evolution of variation in egg color and marking pattern in European passerines: adaptations in a coevolutionary arms race with the cuckoo, Cuculus canorus

    Ingar Jostein Øien;Arne Moksnes;Eivin Røskaft

  • Local law enforcement and illegal bushmeat hunting outside the Serengeti National Park, Tanzania

    Tomas Holmern;John Muya;Eivin Røskaft

  • Human-wildlife conflicts and their correlates in Narok County, Kenya

    Joseph M. Mukeka;Joseph M. Mukeka;Joseph O. Ogutu;Erustus Kanga;Eivin Røskaft

  • Common Cuckoo Cuculus canorus and host behaviour at Reed Warbler Acrocephalus scirpaceus nests

    Arne Moksnes;Eivin Røskaft;Lise Greger Hagen;Marcel Honza

  • Rejection of cuckoo (Cuculus canorus) eggs by meadow pipits (Anthus pratensis)

    Arne Moksnes;Eivin Røskaft;Lars Korsnes

  • Factors associated with wolverine Gulo gulo predation on domestic sheep

    A. Landa;K. Gudvangen;J.E. Swenson;E. Røskaft

  • Rejection of artificial cuckoo (Cuculus canorus) eggs in relation to variation in egg appearance among reed warblers (Acrocephalus scirpaceus)

    Bård G. Stokke;Arne Moksnes;Eivin Røskaft;Geir Rudolfsen

  • The effect of enlarged brood size on the future reproductive potential of the rook

    E. Roskaft

Frequent Co-Authors

Arne Moksnes
Arne Moksnes Norwegian University of Science and Technology
Bård G. Stokke
Bård G. Stokke Norwegian Institute for Nature Research
Marcel Honza
Marcel Honza Czech Academy of Sciences
Anders Pape Møller
Anders Pape Møller University of Paris-Saclay
Wei Liang
Wei Liang Chinese Academy of Sciences
Jacqui A. Shykoff
Jacqui A. Shykoff University of Paris-Saclay
Oddmund Kleven
Oddmund Kleven Norwegian Institute for Nature Research
Geir Rudolfsen
Geir Rudolfsen University of Tromsø - The Arctic University of Norway
Jesús M. Avilés
Jesús M. Avilés Spanish National Research Council
Csaba Moskát
Csaba Moskát Hungarian Natural History Museum

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online education can help launch or advance your career in Ecology and Evolution. Many students consider specialized programs in related fields like biology, environmental sciences, or health sciences. For those interested in fast-tracking their education, direct entry msn online programs offer accelerated pathways, even for students without a nursing background.

Accreditation and quality should be a top priority when choosing an online degree. Institutions such as Capella University underline the importance of recognized credentials. Learn more about program quality with this comparison of capella university nursing accreditation. Cost is another crucial factor—students seeking affordability might look at a list of the cheapest bsn to msn online programs to maximize value and minimize debt.

Finally, choosing from nonprofit online universities can ensure your education is both reputable and trustworthy. This is especially important for those aiming for roles in academia, public service, or research after completing their studies in Ecology and Evolution.

Best Scientists Citing Eivin Røskaft

Trending Scientists