World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
34
Citations
3720
World Ranking
7707
National Ranking
22

Csaba Moskát publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Csaba Moskát sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 95 publications — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Csaba Moskát D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Csaba Moskát sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 11th percentile

11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Csaba Moskát is affiliated with the Hungarian Natural History Museum in Hungary. Their research focuses predominantly on agricultural and biological sciences, environmental science, and biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology. Subfields of interest include ecology, evolution, behavior and systematics, ecology, developmental biology, genetics, and social psychology.

Their work covers a number of main topics, notably:

  • Animal Behavior and Reproduction
  • Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior
  • Avian ecology and behavior
  • Plant and animal studies
  • Genetic diversity and population structure
  • Primate Behavior and Ecology
  • Marine animal studies overview

Csaba Moskát has contributed to several peer-reviewed journals, with frequent publications in:

  • Behavioural Processes
  • Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
  • Science Advances
  • Ethology
  • Die Naturwissenschaften

Coauthors who frequently collaborate with Moskát include Márk E. Hauber, Miklós Bán, Attila Marton, Zoltán Elek, and Attila Fülöp.

Selected recent publications by Csaba Moskát include:

  • Female-female aggression and male responses to the two colour morphs of female common cuckoos, 2020, Die Naturwissenschaften
  • Male common cuckoos use a three-note variant of their "cu-coo" call for duetting with conspecific females, 2021, Behavioural Processes

Other notable papers where Moskát has contributed either as a lead or coauthor include:

  • Female common cuckoo calls dampen the mobbing intensity of great reed warbler hosts, 2021, Ethology
  • Evolution and genetic architecture of sex-limited polymorphism in cuckoos, 2024, Science Advances
  • Call rate in Common Cuckoos does not predict body size and responses to conspecific playbacks, 2021, Journal für Ornithologie

Best Publications

  • European Cuckoo Cuculus canorus parasitism and host's rejection behaviour in a heavily parasitized Great Reed Warbler Acrocephalus arundinaceus population

    Csaba Moskát;Marcel Honza

  • Effect of nest and nest site characteristics on the risk of cuckoo Cuculus canorus parasitism in the great reed warbler Acrocephalus arundinaceus

    Csaba Moskát;Marcel Honza

  • Constraints on host choice: Why do parasitic birds rarely exploit some common potential hosts?

    Tomáš Grim;Peter Samaš;Csaba Moskát;Oddmund Kleven

  • Conflict between egg recognition and egg rejection decisions in common cuckoo (Cuculus canorus) hosts

    Csaba Moskát;Mark Erno Hauber

  • Experimental shift in hosts' acceptance threshold of inaccurate-mimic brood parasite eggs

    Márk E Hauber;Csaba Moskát;Miklós Bán

  • Aggression to dummy cuckoos by potential European cuckoo hosts

    Eivin Røskaft;Arne Moksnes;Bard G. Stokke;Vitezslav Bicik

  • Responses of great reed warblers Acrocephalus arundinaceus to experimental brood parasitism: the effects of a cuckoo Cuculus canorus dummy and egg mimicry

    István Bártol;Zsolt Karcza;Csaba Moskát;Eivin Røskaft

  • The spatial habitat structure of host populations explains the pattern of rejection behavior in hosts and parasitic adaptations in cuckoos

    Eivin Røskaft;Arne Moksnes;Bård G. Stokke;Csaba Moskát

  • Discordancy or template-based recognition? Dissecting the cognitive basis of the rejection of foreign eggs in hosts of avian brood parasites

    Csaba Moskat;Miklos Ban;Tamas Szekely;Jan Komdeur

  • Do cuckoos choose nests of great reed warblers on the basis of host egg appearance

    Michael I. Cherry;A. T.D. Bennett;C. Moskát

  • Host intra-clutch variation, cuckoo egg matching and egg rejection by great reed warblers

    Michael I. Cherry;Andrew T. D. Bennett;Csaba Moskát

  • Rapid change in host use of the common cuckoo Cuculus canorus linked to climate change.

    A. P. Møller;N. Saino;P. Adamík;R. Ambrosini

  • ADAPTATIONS BY GREAT REED WARBLERS TO BROOD PARASITISM: A COMPARISON OF POPULATIONS IN SYMPATRY AND ALLOPATRY WITH THE COMMON CUCKOO

    C. Moskat;J. Szentpeteri;Z. Barta

  • A shared chemical basis of avian host-parasite egg colour mimicry.

    Branislav Igic;Phillip Cassey;Phillip Cassey;Tomáš Grim;David R. Greenwood;David R. Greenwood

  • BREAK-DOWN OF ARMS RACE BETWEEN THE RED-BACKED SHRIKE (LANIUS COLLURIO) AND COMMON CUCKOO (CUCULUS CANORUS)

    Péter Lovászi;Csaba Moskát

  • Experimental support for the use of egg uniformity in parasite egg discrimination by cuckoo hosts

    Csaba Moskát;Jesús M. Avilés;Miklós Bán;Rita Hargitai

  • Eviction behaviour of the common cuckoo Cuculus canorus chicks

    Marcel Honza;Katerina Vošlajerová;Csaba Moskát

  • Simultaneous viewing of own and parasitic eggs is not required for egg rejection by a cuckoo host

    Miklós Bán;Csaba Moskát;Zoltán Barta;Mark Erno Hauber;Mark Erno Hauber

  • The importance of nest cleaning in egg rejection behaviour of great reed warblers Acrocephalus arundinaceus

    Csaba Moskát;Tamás Székely;Tibor Kisbenedek;Zsolt Karcza

  • Hosts’ Responses to Parasitic Eggs: Which Cues Elicit Hosts’ Egg Discrimination?

    Csaba Moskát;Tamás Székely;Innes C. Cuthill;Tibor Kisbenedek

  • Shared parental care is costly for nestlings of common cuckoos and their great reed warbler hosts

    Mark Erno Hauber;Csaba Moskát

  • Egg eviction imposes a recoverable cost of virulence in chicks of a brood parasite.

    Michael G. Anderson;Csaba Moskát;Miklós Bán;Tomáš Grim

Frequent Co-Authors

Mark E. Hauber
Mark E. Hauber Queens College, CUNY
Marcel Honza
Marcel Honza Czech Academy of Sciences
Tomáš Grim
Tomáš Grim Palacký University, Olomouc
Eivin Røskaft
Eivin Røskaft Norwegian University of Science and Technology
Phillip Cassey
Phillip Cassey University of Adelaide
Bård G. Stokke
Bård G. Stokke Norwegian Institute for Nature Research
Arne Moksnes
Arne Moksnes Norwegian University of Science and Technology
Zoltán Barta
Zoltán Barta University of Debrecen
Tamás Székely
Tamás Székely University of Bath
Jesús M. Avilés
Jesús M. Avilés Spanish National Research Council

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in Ecology and Evolution can open doors to a diverse array of online degree options and interdisciplinary opportunities. Many students are now seeking flexible education pathways—particularly those looking to transition from unrelated backgrounds or to accelerate their studies. For example, online speech pathology bridge programs online are designed for non-majors who want to enter the field of communication sciences, while those interested in healthcare might consider accelerated nursing programs for non nurses online to rapidly qualify as registered nurses.

Career advancement and earning potential are important factors for students reviewing their next steps. For instance, if you are curious about salaries within specialized healthcare roles, this resource outlines how much does a psychiatric nurse practitioner make based on your location. For those considering advanced practice roles, it's useful to understand how to become nurse practitioner and the timeline required.

These online degree options and professional pathways demonstrate the increasing accessibility and flexibility of career shifts in science and healthcare—making it easier than ever to find your unique fit in the broader field of life sciences.

Best Scientists Citing Csaba Moskát

Trending Scientists