World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
61
Citations
14537
World Ranking
2177
National Ranking
786

Mark E. Hauber publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark E. Hauber sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 416 publications — 97th percentile

97% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Mark E. Hauber D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark E. Hauber sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 61 D-Index — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mark E. Hauber is affiliated with Queens College, CUNY in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on environmental science and agricultural and biological sciences, with particular emphasis on ecology and its related subfields.

The scientist's work spans several subfields, including ecology, ecology, evolution, behavior and systematics, developmental biology, parasitology, and genetics. Their research topics cover a broad range related to animal and plant studies, highlighting avian ecology and behavior, animal behavior and reproduction, and bird parasitology and diseases. Other topics involve animal vocal communication and behavior, wildlife ecology and conservation, and general animal ecology and behavior studies.

Frequent publication venues for Mark E. Hauber include bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Ethology, Biology Letters, The Auk, and Ecology and Evolution, reflecting a consistent contribution to journals specializing in behavioral and ecological research.

Coauthors frequently collaborating with Hauber are Janice K. Enos, Wendy M. Schelsky, Shelby L. Lawson, Nicholas D. Antonson, and Csaba Moskát. These collaborations indicate ongoing research partnerships across multiple studies.

Recent papers published by Mark E. Hauber include:

  • Innovation and decreased neophobia drive invasion success in a widespread avian invader, 2020, Animal Behaviour
  • The house sparrow in the service of basic and applied biology, 2020, eLife
  • A review of the scientific evidence on the impact of biologically salient frightening devices to protect crops from avian pests, 2021, Crop Protection
  • Ecological uncertainty favours the diversification of host use in avian brood parasites, 2020, Nature Communications
  • Back to the basics? Transcriptomics offers integrative insights into the role of space, time and the environment for gene expression and behaviour, 2021, Biology Letters

Best Publications

  • The biology of color

    Innes C. Cuthill;William L. Allen;Kevin Arbuckle;Barbara Caspers

  • Vertebrate pigmentation: from underlying genes to adaptive function

    Joanna K. Hubbard;J. Albert C Uy;Mark Erno Hauber;Hopi E. Hoekstra

  • Dense sampling of bird diversity increases power of comparative genomics.

    Shaohong Feng;Josefin Stiller;Yuan Deng;Joel Armstrong;Joel Armstrong

  • Different colors reveal different information: how nutritional stress affects the expression of melanin- and structurally based ornamental plumage.

    Kevin J. McGraw;Emiko A. Mackillop;Emiko A. Mackillop;James Dale;James Dale;Mark E. Hauber;Mark E. Hauber

  • Self-referent phenotype matching: theoretical considerations and empirical evidence.

    Mark Erno Hauber;Paul W. Sherman

  • Spatial heterogeneity of mesopredator release within an oceanic island system

    Matt J. Rayner;Mark Erno Hauber;Michael J. Imber;Rosalie K. Stamp

  • Embryonic Learning of Vocal Passwords in Superb Fairy-Wrens Reveals Intruder Cuckoo Nestlings

    Diane Colombelli-Négrel;Mark Erno Hauber;Jeremy Robertson;Frank J. Sulloway

  • Mechanisms of assortative mating in speciation with gene flow: Connecting theory and empirical research

    Michael Kopp;Maria R Servedio;Tamra C Mendelson;Rebecca J Safran

  • A systems approach to animal communication

    Eileen A. Hebets;Andrew B. Barron;Christopher N. Balakrishnan;Mark E. Hauber

  • Brood Parasitic Cowbird Nestlings Use Host Young to Procure Resources

    Rebecca M. Kilner;Joah R. Madden;Mark Erno Hauber;Mark Erno Hauber

  • Embracing multiple definitions of learning.

    Andrew B. Barron;Eileen A. Hebets;Thomas A. Cleland;Courtney L. Fitzpatrick

  • Song Selectivity in the Song System and in the Auditory Forebrain

    Frédéric E. Theunissen;Noopur Amin;Sarita S. Shaevitz;Sarah M.N. Woolley

  • Hatching asynchrony, nestling competition, and the cost of interspecific brood parasitism

    Mark Erno Hauber;Mark Erno Hauber

  • Conflict between egg recognition and egg rejection decisions in common cuckoo (Cuculus canorus) hosts

    Csaba Moskát;Mark Erno Hauber

  • A password for species recognition in a brood-parasitic bird

    Mark Erno Hauber;S. A. Russo;P. W. Sherman

  • Experimental shift in hosts' acceptance threshold of inaccurate-mimic brood parasite eggs

    Márk E Hauber;Csaba Moskát;Miklós Bán

  • The modelling of avian visual perception predicts behavioural rejection responses to foreign egg colours

    Phillip Cassey;Marcel Honza;Tomas Grim;Mark Erno Hauber

  • Bateman's Principle in Cooperatively Breeding Vertebrates: The Effects of Non-breeding Alloparents on Variability in Female and Male Reproductive Success'

    Mark Erno Hauber;Eileen A. Lacey

  • Contemporary and historical separation of transequatorial migration between genetically distinct seabird populations

    Matt J. Rayner;Matt J. Rayner;Mark Erno Hauber;Tammy E. Steeves;Hayley A. Lawrence

  • Perch Proximity Correlates with Higher Rates of Cowbird Parasitism of Ground Nesting Song Sparrows

    Mark E. Hauber;Stefani A. Russo

  • Self-referent phenotype matching in a brood parasite: the armpit effect in brown-headed cowbirds ( Molothrus ater )

    Mark E. Hauber;Paul W. Sherman;Dóra Paprika

Frequent Co-Authors

Phillip Cassey
Phillip Cassey University of Adelaide
Csaba Moskát
Csaba Moskát Hungarian Natural History Museum
Tomáš Grim
Tomáš Grim Palacký University, Olomouc
Dianne H. Brunton
Dianne H. Brunton Massey University
Sonia Kleindorfer
Sonia Kleindorfer University of Vienna
David Raubenheimer
David Raubenheimer University of Sydney
Rebecca J. Safran
Rebecca J. Safran University of Colorado Boulder
Paul W. Sherman
Paul W. Sherman Cornell University
John G. Ewen
John G. Ewen Zoological Society of London
Geoffrey I. N. Waterhouse
Geoffrey I. N. Waterhouse University of Auckland

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Ecology and Evolution in the USA opens up a diverse array of academic and professional paths. With the continued growth of flexible learning options, many students and career changers are now considering fully remote programs to enhance their credentials or shift fields.

For example, some biology graduates explore a transition from teacher to speech language pathologist, a move that may combine a passion for science with the desire to help people communicate. Meanwhile, individuals interested in the built environment and ecosystems can look into online architecture degree programs, where sustainable design and environmental planning are emphasized.

If you are fascinated by data, statistics, and the analytical side of ecology, pursuing an online math bachelor's degree can be a strong foundation for careers in ecological modeling or research.

For those with creative inclinations, a graphic design online degree may lead to science communication careers, where visual storytelling is crucial to sharing ecological discoveries.

These online degree options make it easier than ever to build a customized educational path that fits both your interests and the evolving job market in science and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Mark E. Hauber

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles