World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
46
Citations
10731
World Ranking
4575
National Ranking
66

John Odden publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John Odden sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 107 publications — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

John Odden D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John Odden sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

John Odden is affiliated with the Norwegian Institute for Nature Research in Norway and specializes primarily in environmental science, with a focus on ecology. Their research spans several subfields including ecology, ecological modeling, small animals, ecology, evolution, behavior and systematics, and genetics.

Their work frequently appears in a range of publication venues, indicating diverse interests within ecological and wildlife disciplines. Key journals where they have contributed include Ecology and Evolution, Wildlife Biology, Ecosphere, Landscape Ecology, and Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

John Odden's research addresses multiple topics related to wildlife and environmental studies. These topics include:

  • Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Species Distribution and Climate Change
  • Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies
  • Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
  • Rangeland and Wildlife Management
  • Ecology and biodiversity studies
  • Bat Biology and Ecology Studies

Their recent publications cover important aspects of animal and ecological research. Selected papers include:

  • "Effects of camera-trap placement and number on detection of members of a mammalian assemblage," 2021, Ecosphere
  • "Prerequisites for coexistence: human pressure and refuge habitat availability shape continental-scale habitat use patterns of a large carnivore," 2023, Landscape Ecology
  • "Refrigeration or anti-theft? Food-caching behavior of wolverines (Gulo gulo) in Scandinavia," 2020, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
  • "Sooner, closer, or longer: detectability of mesocarnivores at camera traps," 2020, Journal of Zoology
  • "Smartphone app reveals that lynx avoid human recreationists on local scale, but not home range scale," 2022, Scientific Reports

John Odden has collaborated frequently with several researchers over multiple projects and publications. Prominent coauthors include John D. C. Linnell, Jenny Mattisson, Neri Horntvedt Thorsen, Henrik Andrén, and Marco Heurich.

Best Publications

  • Recovery of large carnivores in Europe’s modern human-dominated landscapes

    Guillaume Chapron;Petra Kaczensky;John D. C. Linnell;Manuela von Arx

  • Moving in the Anthropocene : global reductions in terrestrial mammalian movements

    Marlee A. Tucker;Katrin Böhning-Gaese;William F. Fagan;John M. Fryxell

  • Large carnivores that kill livestock: do "problem individuals" really exist?

    Linnell Jdc;Odden J;Smith Me;Aanes R

  • Prey density, environmental productivity and home-range size in the Eurasian lynx (Lynx lynx)

    Ivar Herfindal;John D. C. Linnell;John Odden;Erlend Birkeland Nilsen

  • Translocation of carnivores as a method for managing problem animals: a review

    John D. C. Linnell;Ronny Aanes;Jon E. Swenson;John Odden

  • Survival rates and causes of mortality in Eurasian lynx (Lynx lynx) in multi-use landscapes

    Henrik Andrén;John D.C. Linnell;Olof Liberg;Reidar Andersen

  • Risk of capture-related mortality in large free-ranging mammals: experiences from Scandinavia

    Jon M. Arnemo;Per Ahlqvist;Roy Andersen;Finn Berntsen

  • Living and dying in a multi‐predator landscape of fear: roe deer are squeezed by contrasting pattern of predation risk imposed by lynx and humans

    Karen Lone;Leif Egil Loe;Terje Gobakken;John D. C. Linnell

  • Home range size and choice of management strategy for lynx in Scandinavia.

    John D. C. Linnell;Reidar Andersen;Tor Kvam;Henrik Andrén

  • Diet of Eurasian lynx, Lynx lynx, in the boreal forest of southeastern Norway: the relative importance of livestock and hares at low roe deer density

    John Odden;John D. C. Linnell;Reidar Andersen

  • Biomedical Protocols for Free-ranging Brown Bears, Gray Wolves, Wolverines and Lynx Editors

    Jon M. Arnemo;Alina Evans;Åsa Fahlman;Per Ahlqvist

  • What shapes Eurasian lynx distribution in human dominated landscapes: selecting prey or avoiding people?

    Mathieu Basille;Ivar Herfindal;Hugues Santin-Janin;John D. C. Linnell

  • Habitat differentiation within the large-carnivore community of Norway's multiple-use landscapes

    Roel May;Jiska Van Dijk;Petter Wabakken;Jon E. Swenson

  • Review of methods to reduce livestock depredation, 1: Guardian animals

    Martin E. Smith;John D. C. Linnell;John Odden;Jon E. Swenson

  • A slow life in hell or a fast life in heaven: demographic analyses of contrasting roe deer populations.

    Erlend B. Nilsen;Jean‐Michel Gaillard;Reidar Andersen;John Odden

  • Framing pictures: A conceptual framework to identify and correct for biases in detection probability of camera traps enabling multi-species comparison

    Tim R. Hofmeester;Joris P.G.M. Cromsigt;Joris P.G.M. Cromsigt;John Odden;Henrik Andrén

  • Climate, season, and social status modulate the functional response of an efficient stalking predator: the Eurasian lynx

    Erlend B. Nilsen;John D. C. Linnell;John Odden;Reidar Andersen

  • Predicting the potential demographic impact of predators on their prey: a comparative analysis of two carnivore-ungulate systems in Scandinavia.

    Vincenzo Gervasi;Erlend B. Nilsen;Håkan Sand;Manuela Panzacchi

  • Estimating total lynx Lynx lynx population size from censuses of family groups

    Henrik Andrén;John D. C. Linnell;Olof Liberg;Per Ahlqvist

  • Lynx depredation on domestic sheep in Norway

    John Odden;John D. C. Linnell;Pal Fossland Moa;Ivar Herfindal

  • Risk taking by Eurasian lynx (Lynx lynx) in a human‐dominated landscape: effects of sex and reproductive status

    N Bunnefeld;J.D C Linnell;J Odden;van Marijtje Duijn

Frequent Co-Authors

John D. C. Linnell
John D. C. Linnell Norwegian Institute for Nature Research
Reidar Andersen
Reidar Andersen Norwegian University of Science and Technology
Henrik Andrén
Henrik Andrén Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
Ivar Herfindal
Ivar Herfindal Norwegian University of Science and Technology
Olof Liberg
Olof Liberg Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
Atle Mysterud
Atle Mysterud University of Oslo
Jean-Michel Gaillard
Jean-Michel Gaillard Claude Bernard University Lyon 1
Jon E. Swenson
Jon E. Swenson Norwegian University of Life Sciences
Leif Egil Loe
Leif Egil Loe Norwegian University of Life Sciences
Audun Stien
Audun Stien University of Tromsø - The Arctic University of Norway

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in Ecology and Evolution opens the door to many online education pathways. For those interested in applying biological sciences to healthcare, comparing the capella rn to bsn vs chamberlain rn to bsn programs can help you decide which fits your professional goals. These online programs provide flexible schedules and specialized coursework for working adults.

If you already have a BSN and wish to advance, there are numerous bsn to msn online programs that are affordable and respected. These bridge programs can deepen your understanding of biological research, environmental health, and leadership in science-related fields.

Accreditation and institutional type matter too. Many students prefer to study at non profit online universities due to their strong academic reputations and commitment to student success.

Finally, if you have a military background, seeking military friendly online schools provides added support and flexibility. These institutions often offer credit for military experience and dedicated aid services.

Best Scientists Citing John Odden

Trending Scientists