World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
73
Citations
21744
World Ranking
1949
National Ranking
1142

Jan Fawcett publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jan Fawcett sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 503 publications — 97th percentile

97% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Jan Fawcett D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jan Fawcett sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 73 D-Index — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jan Fawcett is affiliated with the University of New Mexico in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields within medicine and psychology, with a focus on topics related to mental health, pain management, and oncology.

Their recent publications cover a range of areas including opioid use disorder treatment, depression, and lymphoma diagnosis. Notable papers include:

  • Pramipexole Augmentation of Buprenorphine Improves Pain and Depression in Opioid Use Disorder (2020), published in The Primary Care Companion For CNS Disorders
  • PAULA J. CLAYTON, MD (2021), published in Depression and Anxiety
  • 326 | GLOFITAMAB AND EPCORITAMAB FOR LARGE B CELL LYMPHOMA IN 319 REAL WORLD PATIENTS: A RETROSPECTIVE UK ANALYSIS OF EFFICACY, TOLERABILITY AND PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS (2025), published in Hematological Oncology

Fawcett frequently collaborates with other researchers in the field. Key coauthors include:

  • A. John Rush
  • Rodrigo Escalona
  • Katie A. Busch
  • Ray DePaulo
  • John F. Greden

Their work has been published in a variety of journals, with major publication venues including:

  • The Primary Care Companion For CNS Disorders
  • Depression and Anxiety
  • Hematological Oncology

Jan Fawcett's main fields of study are:

  • Medicine
  • Psychology

Their research extends to several subfields, notably:

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Pharmacology
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Social Psychology

Key topics addressed in their research include:

  • Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
  • Treatment of Major Depression
  • Pain Management and Opioid Use
  • Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment

Best Publications

  • Antidepressant Drug Effects and Depression Severity: A Patient-Level Meta-analysis

    Jay C. Fournier;Robert J. DeRubeis;Steven D. Hollon;Sona Dimidjian

  • A comparison of nefazodone, the cognitive behavioral-analysis system of psychotherapy, and their combination for the treatment of chronic depression.

    Martin B. Keller;James P. McCullough;Daniel N. Klein;Bruce Arnow

  • Time-related predictors of suicide in major affective disorder

    Jan Fawcett;William A. Scheftner;Louis Fogg;David C. Clark

  • Clinical correlates of inpatient suicide.

    Katie A. Busch;Jan A. Fawcett;Douglas G. Jacobs

  • Practice guideline for the treatment of patients with bipolar disorder

    R. M A Hirschfeld;P. J. Clayton;I. Cohen;J. Fawcett

  • Clinical predictors of suicide in patients with major affective disorders: a controlled prospective study.

    Jan Fawcett;William Scheftner;David Clark;Don Hedeker

  • Assessing Anhedonia in Psychiatric Patients: The Pleasure Scale

    Jan Fawcett;David C. Clark;William A. Scheftner;Robert D. Gibbons

  • Catecholamine Metabolism, Depressive Illness, and Drug Response

    James W. Maas;Jan A. Fawcett;Haroutune Dekirmenjian

  • Clinical management--imipramine/placebo administration manual. NIMH Treatment of Depression Collaborative Research Program.

    J Fawcett;P Epstein;S J Fiester;I Elkin

  • Treatment Received by Depressed Patients

    Martin B. Keller;Gerald L. Klerman;Philip W. Lavori;Jan A. Fawcett

  • Review of the results from clinical studies on the efficacy, safety and tolerability of mirtazapine for the treatment of patients with major depression

    Jan Fawcett;Robert L Barkin

  • 3-Methoxy-4-Hydroxy Phenylglycol (MHPG) Excretion in Depressive States: A Pilot Study

    James W. Maas;Jan Fawcett;Haroutune Dekirmenjian

  • Maintenance Phase Efficacy of Sertraline for Chronic Depression: A Randomized Controlled Trial

    M B Keller;J H Kocsis;M E Thase;A J Gelenberg

  • The Treatment of Chronic Depression, Part 2: A Double-Blind, Randomized Trial of Sertraline and Imipramine

    Martin B. Keller;Alan J. Gelenberg;Robert M.A. Hirschfeld;A. John Rush

  • Anxiety syndromes and their relationship to depressive illness.

    Jan Fawcett;Howard M. Kravitz

  • Stable trait components of hopelessness: baseline and sensitivity to depression

    Michael A. Young;Louis F. Fogg;William Scheftner;Jan Fawcett

  • Double-blind switch study of imipramine or sertraline treatment of antidepressant-resistant chronic depression.

    Michael E. Thase;A. John Rush;Robert H. Howland;Susan G. Kornstein

  • Efficacy and safety of fluoxetine in treating bipolar II major depressive episode.

    Jay D. Amsterdam;Felipe Garcia-Espana;Jan Fawcett;Frederick M. Quitkin

  • Depression and MHPG excretion. Response to dextroamphetamine and tricyclic antidepressants.

    Jan Fawcett;James W. Maas;Haroutune Dekirmenjian

  • Gender differences in the clinical features of unipolar major depressive disorder.

    Michael A. Young;William A. Scheftner;Jan Fawcett;Gerald L. Klerman

  • A Meta-Analysis of Eight Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled Clinical Trials of Mirtazapine for the Treatment of Patients With Major Depression and Symptoms of Anxiety

    Jan Fawcett;Robert L. Barkin

Frequent Co-Authors

David Clark
David Clark University of Glasgow
Jay D. Amsterdam
Jay D. Amsterdam University of Pennsylvania
Martin B. Keller
Martin B. Keller Brown University
Jerrold F. Rosenbaum
Jerrold F. Rosenbaum Harvard University
Michael A. Young
Michael A. Young Illinois Institute of Technology
Robert D. Gibbons
Robert D. Gibbons University of Chicago
William Coryell
William Coryell University of Iowa
Frederic M. Quitkin
Frederic M. Quitkin Columbia University
Robert J. DeRubeis
Robert J. DeRubeis University of Pennsylvania
Jean Endicott
Jean Endicott Columbia University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology in the USA opens doors to a range of online degrees and specialized career paths, including substance abuse counseling. As the demand for mental health professionals continues to rise, many states offer flexible online programs to help students gain the necessary skills and certifications.

For those interested in becoming a counselor, it’s important to note that education and certification requirements vary by location. For example, Arlington substance abuse counselors education requirements often include a combination of academic training and supervised clinical hours. In contrast, those looking at becoming a substance abuse counselor in Atlanta will find different criteria, such as distinct licensure exams and professional standards.

Prospective counselors should also review substance abuse counselor requirements in Aurora, which outline educational prerequisites and certification steps. Similarly, Austin substance abuse counselor certification requirements provide guidance on local pathways and continuing education.

By exploring these regional guidelines, students can select the online degree that best fits their career aspirations and state requirements, supporting a successful entry into the field of psychology and counseling.

Best Scientists Citing Jan Fawcett

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles