World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 37 9114 8516 4835 4402 88 7163

Michael A. Young publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Michael A. Young between 1976 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Michael A. Young published across 50 years, from 1976 to 2025, averaging 2.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 8 publications in 2020. 6 of the 115 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1976 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 8. Peak 8 publications in 2020. 1976: 1 publication 1977: 1 publication 1978: 2 publications 1979: 2 publications 1980: 3 publications 1981: 1 publication 1982: 3 publications 1983: 1 publication 1984: 1 publication 1985: 4 publications 1986: 1 publication 1987: 4 publications 1988: 1 publication 1989: 0 publications 1990: 5 publications 1991: 4 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 1 publication 1995: 0 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 5 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 4 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 1 publication 2006: 1 publication 2007: 4 publications 2008: 1 publication 2009: 3 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 0 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 2 publications 2014: 1 publication 2015: 3 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 2 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 8 publications 2021: 2 publications 2022: 1 publication 2023: 1 publication 2024: 2 publications 2025: 4 publications
1976 2025

115 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Michael A. Young: publications per year, 1976 to 2025
Year Publications
1976 1
1977 1
1978 2
1979 2
1980 3
1981 1
1982 3
1983 1
1984 1
1985 4
1986 1
1987 4
1988 1
1989 0
1990 5
1991 4
1992 2
1993 1
1994 1
1995 0
1996 2
1997 1
1998 5
1999 1
2000 4
2001 0
2002 2
2003 6
2004 1
2005 1
2006 1
2007 4
2008 1
2009 3
2010 2
2011 0
2012 4
2013 2
2014 1
2015 3
2016 6
2017 2
2018 3
2019 4
2020 8
2021 2
2022 1
2023 1
2024 2
2025 4
Total 115
Download as CSV

Michael A. Young publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael A. Young sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 81–90 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 88 publications — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605 88
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Michael A. Young D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael A. Young sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 36–37 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659 37
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Michael A. Young is affiliated with the Illinois Institute of Technology in the United States. Their research contributions span primarily across the fields of Medicine and Psychology, with notable focus areas including Surgery, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology.

Their work addresses a variety of topics such as Mental Health Research Topics, Behavioral Health and Interventions, Peripheral Artery Disease Management, and Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development. Additional research interests include Antiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular Diseases, Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases, and Occupational Health and Performance.

Among their recent papers are several interdisciplinary studies published between 2020 and 2021. These include:

  • Meta-analysis of sleep deprivation in the acute treatment of bipolar depression (2020), published in Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica
  • Monitoring processes in extended emotion regulation (2020), published in Cognition & Emotion
  • The Symptom Structure of Seasonal Affective Disorder: Integrating Results from Factor and Network Analyses in the Context of the Dual Vulnerability Model (2021), published in Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment
  • Genetic association of primary non-response to Anti-TNFα therapy in patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease (2020), published in bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Executive Functioning and Emotion Regulation Contributions to Social Interaction and Communication (2020), published in Psychological Studies

Frequent co-authors in their publications include Stanislav Henkin, Kelly J. Rohan, David J. Malenka, Niveditta Ramkumar, and James M. Flynn.

Michael A. Young's research has been disseminated notably in journals such as Circulation, with four publications, the Journal of the American College of Cardiology with three, and The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research with two. Other venues include Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica and Cognition & Emotion.

They have also contributed to book publications, including a title published by StatPearls Publishing eBooks: Percutaneous Transhepatic Cholangiogram (2021).

Best Publications

  • Time-related predictors of suicide in major affective disorder

    Jan Fawcett;William A. Scheftner;Louis Fogg;David C. Clark

  • Bright Light Treatment of Winter Depression: A Placebo-Controlled Trial

    Charmane I. Eastman;Michael A. Young;Louis F. Fogg;Liwen Liu

  • DSM-V and the stigma of mental illness

    Dror Ben-Zeev;Michael A. Young;Patrick W. Corrigan

  • Stable trait components of hopelessness: baseline and sensitivity to depression

    Michael A. Young;Louis F. Fogg;William Scheftner;Jan Fawcett

  • Effect of Clozapine on Human Serum Prolactin Levels

    Herbert Y. Meltzer;David J. Goode;Paul M. Schyve;Michael Young

  • Racial group differences in help-seeking behaviors

    Liat Ayalon;Michael A Young

  • Gender differences in the clinical features of unipolar major depressive disorder.

    Michael A. Young;William A. Scheftner;Jan Fawcett;Gerald L. Klerman

  • Extrapyramidal side effects and increased serum prolactin following fluoxetine, a new antidepressant.

    H. Y. Meltzer;M. Young;J. Metz;V. S. Fang

  • Retrospective recall of affect in clinically depressed individuals and controls

    Dror Ben-Zeev;Michael A. Young;Joshua W. Madsen

  • Role of REM sleep and dream affect in overnight mood regulation: a study of normal volunteers

    Rosalind Cartwright;Alice Luten;Michael Young;Patricia Mercer

  • Which environmental variables are related to the onset of seasonal affective disorder

    Michael A. Young;Patricia M. Meaden;Louis F. Fogg;Eva A. Cherin

  • The equivalence of the Child Behavior Checklist/1 1/2-5 across parent race/ethnicity, income level, and language.

    Deborah Gross;Louis Fogg;Michael Young;Alison Ridge

  • Real-time predictors of suicidal ideation: Mobile assessment of hospitalized depressed patients

    Dror Ben-Zeev;Michael A. Young;Colin A. Depp

  • Comparing Retrospective Reports to Real-Time/Real-Place Mobile Assessments in Individuals With Schizophrenia and a Nonclinical Comparison Group

    Dror Ben-Zeev;Gregory J. McHugo;Haiyi Xie;Katy Dobbins

  • The temporal onset of individual symptoms in winter depression: differentiating underlying mechanisms.

    Michael A. Young;Lucie G. Watel;Henry W. Lahmeyer;Charmane I. Eastman

  • Sex differences in the lifetime prevalence of depression: does varying the diagnostic criteria reduce the female/male ratio?

    Michael A. Young;Louis F. Fogg;William A. Scheftner;Martin B. Keller

  • Accuracy of hospitalized depressed patients' and healthy controls' retrospective symptom reports: an experience sampling study.

    Dror Ben-Zeev;Michael A. Young

  • Interactions of risk factors in predicting suicide.

    Michael A. Young;Louis Fogg;William A. Scheftner;Jan A. Fawcett

  • Evaluating diagnostic criteria: A latent class paradigm

    Michael A. Young

  • Isolation and characterization of a nuclear depressive syndrome.

    W. M. Grove;N. C. Andreasen;M. Young;J. Endicott

  • A Comparison Of Depressive Symptons In African Americans And Caucasian Americans

    Liat Ayalon;Michael A. Young

Frequent Co-Authors

Jan Fawcett
Jan Fawcett University of New Mexico
Herbert Y. Meltzer
Herbert Y. Meltzer Northwestern University
David Clark
David Clark University of Glasgow
Charmane I. Eastman
Charmane I. Eastman Rush University Medical Center
Liat Ayalon
Liat Ayalon Bar-Ilan University
Martin B. Keller
Martin B. Keller Brown University
Robert D. Gibbons
Robert D. Gibbons University of Chicago
Robert M. A. Hirschfeld
Robert M. A. Hirschfeld The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston
Donald Hedeker
Donald Hedeker University of Chicago
Nancy C. Andreasen
Nancy C. Andreasen University of Iowa

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in psychology opens the door to a wide range of online degree options and professional pathways in counseling and mental health services. As demand for trained counselors grows, many students are looking for accessible and affordable ways to start or advance their careers.

When researching programs, cost is a significant concern. Prospective students can find guidance by exploring resources like the cheapest counseling programs in San Diego and the affordable counseling degrees in Seattle. These guides highlight competitive programs that balance quality with affordability.

Interested in other locations? There are also options like the most affordable counseling degree programs in Tempe and a comprehensive list of affordable counseling programs in Texas. These resources help students match their career goals with programs that fit their budget, whether you’re seeking a bachelor’s, master’s, or certificate in psychology or counseling.

With many flexible online options now available, students can train for roles in mental health counseling, school counseling, or specialized therapy positions. Affordable degree pathways make it easier to start building a rewarding career in the field of psychology.

Best Scientists Citing Michael A. Young

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles