World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
32
Citations
5249
World Ranking
8014
National Ranking
146

Beat Naef-Daenzer publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Beat Naef-Daenzer sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 76 publications — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Beat Naef-Daenzer D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Beat Naef-Daenzer sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Beat Naef-Daenzer is affiliated with the Swiss Ornithological Institute in Switzerland. Their research primarily focuses on Environmental Science, with a specialization in Ecology and related subfields.

The scientist's main fields of study include:

  • Environmental Science

Subfields of study cover a range of ecological disciplines:

  • Ecology
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Ecological Modeling
  • General Health Professions

Their work addresses several key topics, including:

  • Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Avian ecology and behavior
  • Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Animal Behavior and Reproduction
  • Species Distribution and Climate Change
  • Rangeland and Wildlife Management
  • Indigenous Studies and Ecology

Beat Naef-Daenzer has contributed to multiple recent publications, with research papers appearing in varied scientific venues:

  • "Juvenile survival of little owls decreases with snow cover," 2024, Ecology and Evolution
  • "Reduced habitat quality increases intrinsic but not ecological costs of reproduction," 2022, Ecology and Evolution
  • "Political borders impact associations between habitat suitability predictions and resource availability," 2020, Landscape Ecology
  • "Political borders impact associations between habitat suitability predictions and resource availability," 2020, Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • "Reduced habitat quality increases intrinsic but not ecological costs of reproduction," 2022, Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)

Their most frequent publication venues are:

  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Ecology and Evolution
  • Landscape Ecology

Beat Naef-Daenzer collaborates regularly with various researchers, with frequent coauthors including:

  • Matthias Tschumi
  • Martin U. Grüebler
  • Herbert Keil
  • Vanja T. Michel
  • Patrick Scherler

Best Publications

  • Differential post-fledging survival of great and coal tits in relation to their condition and fledging date

    Beat Naef-Daenzer;Fritz Widmer;Maria Nuber

  • The foraging performance of great and blue tits (Parus major and P. caeruleus) in relation to caterpillar development, and its consequences for nestling growth and fledging weight

    Beat Naef‐Daenzer;Lukas F. Keller

  • The design of artificial nestboxes for the study of secondary hole-nesting birds: a review of methodological inconsistencies and potential biases

    Marcel M. Lambrechts;Frank Adriaensen;Daniel R. Ardia;Alexandr V. Artemyev

  • Prey selection and foraging performance of breeding Great Tits Parus major in relation to food availability

    Luzia Naef-Daenzer;Beat Naef-Daenzer;Ruedi G. Nager

  • Radio-tracking reveals that lesser horseshoe bats (Rhinolophus hipposideros) forage in woodland

    Fabio Bontadina;Henry Schofield;Beat Naef-Daenzer

  • Quantifying habitat use in satellite-tracked pelagic seabirds : application of kernel estimation to albatross locations

    A. G. Wood;B. Naef-Daenzer;P. A. Prince;J. P. Croxall

  • Post-fledging survival of altricial birds: ecological determinants and adaptation

    Beat Naef‐Daenzer;Martin U. Grüebler

  • An allometric function to fit leg‐loop harnesses to terrestrial birds

    Beat Naef-Daenzer

  • Body condition and wind support initiate the shift of migratory direction and timing of nocturnal departure in a songbird.

    Heiko Schmaljohann;Beat Naef-Daenzer

  • A predictive model of the density of airborne insects in agricultural environments

    Martin U. Grüebler;Martin U. Grüebler;Muriel Morand;Beat Naef-Daenzer

  • Female biased mortality caused by anthropogenic nest loss contributes to population decline and adult sex ratio of a meadow bird

    Martin U. Grüebler;Heidi Schuler;Mathis Müller;Reto Spaar

  • Patch time allocation and patch sampling by foraging great and blue tits.

    Beat Naef-Daenzer

  • Miniaturization (0.2 g) and evaluation of attachment techniques of telemetry transmitters

    B. Naef-Daenzer;D. Früh;M. Stalder;P. Wetli

  • FITNESS CONSEQUENCES OF PRE- AND POST-FLEDGING TIMING DECISIONS IN A DOUBLE-BROODED PASSERINE

    Martin U. Grüebler;Martin U. Grüebler;Beat Naef-Daenzer

  • Habitat use and foraging ecology of the nightjar (Caprimulgus europaeus) in the Swiss Alps: towards a conservation scheme

    Antoine Sierro;Raphaël Arlettaz;Beat Naef-Daenzer;Stephan Strebel

  • Stopover optimization in a long-distance migrant: the role of fuel load and nocturnal take-off time in Alaskan northern wheatears (Oenanthe oenanthe)

    Heiko Schmaljohann;Fränzi Korner-Nievergelt;Beat Naef-Daenzer;Rolf Nagel

  • A New Transmitter for Small Animals and Enhanced Methods of Home-Range Analysis

    Unknown

  • Nocturnal exploratory flights, departure time, and direction in a migratory songbird

    Heiko Schmaljohann;Philipp J. J. Becker;Hakan Karaardic;Felix Liechti

  • Ecologically enhanced areas – a key habitat structure for re-introduced grey partridges Perdix perdix

    Francis Buner;Francis Buner;Markus Jenny;Niklaus Zbinden;Beat Naef-Daenzer

  • Survival benefits of post‐fledging care: experimental approach to a critical part of avian reproductive strategies

    Martin U. Grüebler;Martin U. Grüebler;Beat Naef-Daenzer

  • Fitness consequences of timing of breeding in birds: date effects in the course of a reproductive episode

    Martin U Grüebler;Beat Naef-Daenzer

  • Exclusion of ground predators improves Northern Lapwing Vanellus vanellus chick survival

    Olivia Rickenbach;Olivia Rickenbach;Martin U. Grüebler;Michael Schaub;Michael Schaub;Andreia Koller

Frequent Co-Authors

Martin Wikelski
Martin Wikelski Max Planck Institute for Ornithology
Heiko Schmaljohann
Heiko Schmaljohann Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg
Guy Pe'er
Guy Pe'er Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research
Raphaël Arlettaz
Raphaël Arlettaz University of Bern
Hanna Kokko
Hanna Kokko Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz
Ruedi G. Nager
Ruedi G. Nager University of Glasgow
Lukas F. Keller
Lukas F. Keller University of Zurich
Franz Bairlein
Franz Bairlein Max Planck Society
L. Scott Johnson
L. Scott Johnson Towson University
Charles F. Thompson
Charles F. Thompson Illinois State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Ecology and Evolution can open doors to a variety of interdisciplinary careers. Many students expand their career options by looking at online degree programs and flexible learning pathways. For those interested in health sciences, there are opportunities to pivot into high-demand careers. For example, speech language pathology bridge programs online help non-SLP majors transition into communication sciences, a field that draws on both biology and behavior.

Another route for science-oriented graduates is healthcare. Non-nurses can rapidly enter the nursing profession through accelerated nursing programs for non nurses, which provide a fast track to a BSN degree. After qualifying as a nurse, further specialization, such as becoming a Nurse Practitioner, offers lucrative possibilities. To learn more about earning potential by location, explore psychiatric np salary information.

If you are considering advanced nursing roles, you might also wonder about the educational timeline. For more on how quickly you can progress, visit how long to become a nurse practitioner. These pathways show the broad range of possibilities for students in science-related fields, either online or through blended programs.

Best Scientists Citing Beat Naef-Daenzer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles