World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
48
Citations
8551
World Ranking
4236
National Ranking
63

Tapio Eeva publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tapio Eeva sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 148 publications — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Tapio Eeva D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tapio Eeva sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Tapio Eeva is a researcher affiliated with the University of Turku in Finland. Their work primarily spans the fields of Environmental Science and Agricultural and Biological Sciences, with a particular focus on Ecology and aspects of toxicology and mutagenesis.

Their research interests include subfields such as Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Ecological Modeling, and Insect Science. Within these areas, Eeva has published extensively on topics like Avian ecology and behavior, Mercury impact and mitigation studies, Species Distribution and Climate Change, Wildlife Ecology and Conservation, Heavy Metal Exposure and Toxicity, Animal Behavior and Reproduction, and heavy metals in the environment.

Tapio Eeva's publication record features papers in key venues such as Environmental Pollution, SSRN Electronic Journal, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Journal of Animal Ecology, and Toxics. Among recent publications are studies including:

  • Connecting the data landscape of long-term ecological studies: The SPI-Birds data hub (2020, Journal of Animal Ecology)
  • The effect of climate change on avian offspring production: A global meta-analysis (2023, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences)
  • Bird populations most exposed to climate change are less sensitive to climatic variation (2022, Nature Communications)
  • Bird Feces as Indicators of Metal Pollution: Pitfalls and Solutions (2020, Toxics)
  • Winter activity of boreal bats (2021, Mammalian Biology)

Their co-author network includes frequent collaborators such as Pablo Sánchez-Virosta, Silvia Espín, Blandine Doligez, Frank Adriaensen, and Emilio Barba. These collaborations have contributed to advancing research in ecological and environmental toxicology domains.

Tapio Eeva's work intersects with environmental monitoring and pollution studies, especially through investigations into heavy metals and their biological impacts, including mercury and other toxic elements. The research combines ecological modeling and field studies, emphasizing avian species and their responses to environmental changes.

Best Publications

  • Large–scale geographical variation confirms that climate change causes birds to lay earlier

    Christiaan Both;Aleksandr V. Artemyev;Bert Blaauw;Richard J. Cowie

  • Adaptive responses of animals to climate change are most likely insufficient

    Viktoriia Radchuk;Thomas Reed;Céline Teplitsky;Martijn van der Pol

  • The design of artificial nestboxes for the study of secondary hole-nesting birds: a review of methodological inconsistencies and potential biases

    Marcel M. Lambrechts;Frank Adriaensen;Daniel R. Ardia;Alexandr V. Artemyev

  • Variation in climate warming along the migration route uncouples arrival and breeding dates

    Markus Ahola;Toni Laaksonen;Katja Sippola;Tapio Eeva

  • Metal-related oxidative stress in birds.

    Miia J. Koivula;Tapio Eeva

  • Evolutionary signals of selection on cognition from the great tit genome and methylome

    Veronika N. Laine;Toni I. Gossmann;Kyle M. Schachtschneider;Kyle M. Schachtschneider;Colin J. Garroway

  • Growth and mortality of nestling great tits (Parus major) and pied flycatchers (Ficedula hypoleuca) in a heavy metal pollution gradient

    Tapio Eeva;Esa Lehikoinen

  • Egg shell quality, clutch size and hatching success of the great tit (Parus major) and the pied flycatcher (Ficedula hypoleuca) in an air pollution gradient

    Tapio Eeva;Esa Lehikoinen

  • Air pollution fades the plumage of the Great Tit

    T. Eeva;E. Lehikoinen;M. RÖnkÄ

  • Biomarkers and fluctuating asymmetry as indicators of pollution-induced stress in two hole-nesting passerines

    T. Eeva;S. Tanhuanpää;C. Råbergh;S. Airaksinen

  • Climate change, breeding date and nestling diet: how temperature differentially affects seasonal changes in pied flycatcher diet depending on habitat variation

    Claudia Burger;Eugen Belskii;Tapio Eeva;Toni Laaksonen

  • Climate change can alter competitive relationships between resident and migratory birds.

    Markus P. Ahola;Toni Laaksonen;Tapio Eeva;Esa Lehikoinen

  • Pollution-related changes in diets of two insectivorous passerines

    T. Eeva;M. Ryömä;J. Riihimäki

  • Species- and age-related variation in metal exposure and accumulation of two passerine bird species

    Åsa M. M. Berglund;Miia J. Koivula;Tapio Eeva

  • Heavy metal pollution disturbs immune response in wild ant populations.

    Jouni Sorvari;Liisa M. Rantala;Markus J. Rantala;Markus J. Rantala;Harri Hakkarainen

  • A review on exposure and effects of arsenic in passerine birds.

    P. Sánchez-Virosta;S. Espín;S. Espín;A.J. García-Fernández;T. Eeva

  • POLLUTION‐RELATED VARIATION IN FOOD SUPPLY AND BREEDING SUCCESS IN TWO HOLE‐NESTING PASSERINES

    Tapio Eeva;Esa Lehikoinen;Tuija Pohjalainen

  • Effects of heavy metal pollution on red wood ant (Formica s. str.) populations

    T. Eeva;J. Sorvari;V. Koivunen

  • Breeding performance of blue tits (Cyanistes caeruleus) and great tits (Parus major) in a heavy metal polluted area.

    T. Eeva;M. Ahola;E. Lehikoinen

  • Effects of ectoparasites on breeding success of great tits (Parus major) and pied flycatchers (Ficedula hypoleuca) in an air pollution gradient

    Tapio Eeva;Esa Lehikoinen;Jorma Nurmi

Frequent Co-Authors

Esa Lehikoinen
Esa Lehikoinen University of Turku
Toni Laaksonen
Toni Laaksonen University of Turku
Raivo Mänd
Raivo Mänd University of Tartu
Marcel E. Visser
Marcel E. Visser University of Groningen
János Török
János Török Eötvös Loránd University
Blandine Doligez
Blandine Doligez Claude Bernard University Lyon 1
Juha-Pekka Salminen
Juha-Pekka Salminen University of Turku
Markku Orell
Markku Orell University of Oulu
Frank Adriaensen
Frank Adriaensen University of Antwerp
Tore Slagsvold
Tore Slagsvold University of Oslo

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in Ecology and Evolution, exploring related online degrees can broaden your career options and deepen your expertise. Many universities now offer fully accredited programs that allow you to study from anywhere, making it easier to balance learning with other commitments.

Consider the versatility of an best value online interdisciplinary studies degrees, which empowers you to combine courses from ecology, environmental science, and even policy, maximizing your job prospects in both research and applied fields.

Technical skills are increasingly valued across science careers. For instance, a math degree online can boost your data analysis abilities—an essential strength in ecological research. Creative skills are also in demand; earning an online graphic design degree can help you communicate scientific findings through compelling visuals and infographics.

Additionally, if your ecological interests intersect with sustainable design or environmental planning, consider an architect online degree to develop expertise in creating eco-friendly spaces and communities.

These diverse pathways provide flexible, affordable, and impactful ways to expand your skills and achieve your career goals in ecology and related disciplines.

Best Scientists Citing Tapio Eeva

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles