World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
37
Citations
11189
World Ranking
6076
National Ranking
2900

Daniel Sarewitz publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel Sarewitz sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 130 publications — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Daniel Sarewitz D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel Sarewitz sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2006 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Daniel Sarewitz is affiliated with Arizona State University in the United States. Their research encompasses multiple interdisciplinary topics, focusing primarily on science policy, technology assessment, and the social dimensions of scientific knowledge. The scholar's work addresses complex issues at the intersection of science, society, and governance.

The following are recent papers authored or co-authored by Daniel Sarewitz:

  • Five ways to ensure that models serve society: a manifesto, 2020, Nature
  • Designing Participatory Technology Assessments: A Reflexive Method for Advancing the Public Role in Science Policy Decision-making, 2021, Technological Forecasting and Social Change
  • What did COVID-19 really teach us about science, evidence and society?, 2023, Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice
  • Economists Being Economists, 2023, Issues in Science and Technology

Frequent co-authors of Daniel Sarewitz include:

  • Andrea Saltelli
  • Gabriele Bammer
  • Isabelle Bruno
  • Érica Charters
  • Monica Di Fiore

They have published in a range of venues, including:

  • Nature
  • Technological Forecasting and Social Change
  • Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice
  • Issues in Science and Technology

Daniel Sarewitz's work spans several subfields of study, among which are:

  • Modeling and Simulation
  • Global and Planetary Change
  • Management of Technology and Innovation
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • General Health Professions

The main research topics covered by their work include:

  • COVID-19 epidemiological studies
  • Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
  • Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development
  • Delphi Technique in Research
  • Healthcare cost, quality, practices
  • COVID-19 and healthcare impacts
  • COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies

In recognition of their contributions to science, Daniel Sarewitz was named a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 2006.

Best Publications

  • How science makes environmental controversies worse

    Daniel Sarewitz

  • Real-time technology assessment

    David H. Guston;Daniel Sarewitz

  • The neglected heart of science policy: reconciling supply of and demand for science

    Daniel Sarewitz;Roger A. Pielke

  • The future of sustainability science: a solutions-oriented research agenda

    Thaddeus R. Miller;Arnim Wiek;Daniel Sarewitz;John Robinson

  • Climate change 2007: Lifting the taboo on adaptation

    Roger Pielke;Gwyn Prins;Steve Rayner;Daniel Sarewitz

  • Improving the contribution of climate model information to decision making: the value and demands of robust decision frameworks

    Christopher P. Weaver;Robert J. Lempert;Casey Brown;John A Hall

  • Five ways to ensure that models serve society: a manifesto.

    Andrea Saltelli;Gabriele Bammer;Isabelle Bruno;Erica Charters

  • Vulnerability and risk: Some thoughts from a political and policy perspective

    Daniel Sarewitz;Roger Pielke;Mojdeh Keykhah

  • Public Value Mapping and Science Policy Evaluation

    Barry Bozeman;Daniel Sarewitz

  • Frontiers of illusion : science, technology, and the politics of progress

    Daniel R. Sarewitz

  • Characterizing Climate-Change Uncertainties for Decision-Makers. An Editorial Essay

    Robert Lempert;Nebojsa Nakicenovic;Daniel Sarewitz;Michael Schlesinger

  • Characterizing Climate-Change Uncertainties for Decision-Makers

    Robert J. Lempert;Nebojsa Nakicenovic;Daniel R Sarewitz;Michael E. Schlesinger

  • Prediction : science, decision making, and the future of nature

    Daniel Sarewitz;Roger A. Pielke;Radford Byerly

  • The Hartwell Paper: a new direction for climate policy after the crash of 2009

    Gwyn Prins;Isabel Galiana;Christopher Green;Reiner Grundmann

  • Public values and public failure in US science policy

    Barry Bozeman;Daniel Sarewitz

  • The pressure to publish pushes down quality.

    Daniel Sarewitz

  • Prediction in science and policy

    Daniel Sarewitz;Roger Pielke

  • Frontiers of illusion

    Daniel R. Sarewitz

  • Improving the public value of science: A typology to inform discussion, design and implementation of research

    Elizabeth C. McNie;Elizabeth C. McNie;Adam Parris;Daniel Sarewitz

  • Three rules for technological fixes

    Daniel Sarewitz;Richard Nelson

  • Improving the Contribution of Climate Model Information to Decision Making

    Christopher P. Weaver;Robert J. Lempert;Casey Brown;John A. Hall

  • Lifting the Taboo on the Adaptation

    Roger Pielke Jr;Gwyn Prins;Steve Rayner;Daniel Sarewitz

Frequent Co-Authors

Roger A. Pielke
Roger A. Pielke University of Colorado Boulder
Steve Rayner
Steve Rayner University of Oxford
Robert J. Lempert
Robert J. Lempert RAND Corporation
Jeroen P. van der Sluijs
Jeroen P. van der Sluijs University of Bergen
Casey Brown
Casey Brown University of Massachusetts Amherst
Lennart Olsson
Lennart Olsson Lund University
Michael E. Schlesinger
Michael E. Schlesinger University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Derk Loorbach
Derk Loorbach Erasmus University Rotterdam
Nebojsa Nakicenovic
Nebojsa Nakicenovic International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis
Andrew Stirling
Andrew Stirling University of Sussex

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in Social Sciences and Humanities can open diverse career pathways, from counseling to human services. For those seeking an affordable start, consider a cheap online psychology degree, which helps reduce financial barriers while building foundational skills in human behavior and mental health.

If your interest lies in social work, there are accelerated options such as 1 year MSW programs online no BSW required. These programs are designed for students from various undergraduate backgrounds and can help you quickly enter the social work profession.

For those aspiring to advanced clinical practice, the best online PsyD programs offer flexible paths to becoming licensed psychologists, combining online coursework with clinical internships.

Counseling and family therapy is another promising field. You might consider online MFT programs for a faster route to becoming a marriage and family therapist. With these diverse options, online education makes it easier than ever to pursue meaningful careers in social sciences and humanities.

Best Scientists Citing Daniel Sarewitz

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles