World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
64
Citations
21465
World Ranking
1081
National Ranking
49

Arie Rip publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Arie Rip sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 372 publications — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Arie Rip D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Arie Rip sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 64 D-Index — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Arie Rip is affiliated with the University of Twente in the Netherlands. Their research spans multiple fields, primarily focusing on Business, Management and Accounting, along with Social Sciences and Medicine. Within these areas, Rip's work covers subfields such as Management of Technology and Innovation, Strategy and Management, Political Science and International Relations, Physiology, and Molecular Biology.

The scientist's research topics include University-Industry-Government Innovation Models, Regional Development and Policy, Innovation and Knowledge Management, Regulation and Compliance Studies, Biomedical Ethics and Regulation, and Bacillus and Francisella bacterial research.

Recent publications reflect this multidisciplinary engagement. One notable recent paper is titled "Improving distributed intelligence in complex innovation systems," published in 2022 in the Munich Personal RePEc Archive (Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich). This paper has received citations that indicate its relevance within the research community.

  • Improving distributed intelligence in complex innovation systems (2022), Munich Personal RePEc Archive (Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich)

Collaboration is part of Rip's scholarly activity, with frequent co-authors including Stefan Kuhlmann, Patries Boekholt, Luke Georghiou, Ken Guy, and Jean-Alain Héraud. These collaborations span topics related to innovation systems and management.

The work appears regularly in venues such as the Munich Personal RePEc Archive, which supports dissemination of research in economic and innovation studies.

Best Publications

  • Theory of Electric Polarization

    C. J. F. Böttcher;O. C. van Belle;P. Bordewijk;A. Rip

  • Mapping the Dynamics of Science and Technology

    Michel Callon;John Law;Arie Rip

  • The past and future of constructive technology assessment

    JW Johan Schot;A Arie Rip

  • Managing Technology in Society

    Arie Rip;Thomas J Misa;Johan Schot

  • Mapping the dynamics of science and technology : sociology of science in the real world

    Susan E. Cozzens;Michel Callon;John Law;Arie Rip

  • Constructing Transition Paths Through the Management of Niches

    R Kemp;A Arie Rip;JW Johan Schot

  • Managing technology in society: the approach of constructive technology assessment

    Arie Rip;Thomas J Misa;Johan Schot

  • Next-Generation Innovation Policy and Grand Challenges

    Stefan Kuhlmann;Arie Rip

  • TAKING EUROPEAN KNOWLEDGE SOCIETY SERIOUSLY Report of the Expert Group on Science and Governance to the Science, Economy and Society Directorate, Directorate-General for Research, European Commission

    Ulrike Felt;Brian Wynne;Michel Callon;Maria Eduarda Gonçalves

  • Nano-ethics as NEST-ethics: Patterns of Moral Argumentation About New and Emerging Science and Technology

    Tsjalling Swierstra;Arie Rip

  • Expectations in Technological Developments: an Example of Prospective Structures to be Filled in by Agency

    H. van Lente;A. Rip

  • Co-word maps of biotechnology: An example of cognitive scientometrics

    Arie Rip;Jean Pierre Courtial

  • The Rise of Membrane Technology From Rhetorics to Social Reality

    Harro van Lente;Arie Rip

  • TECHNOLOGICAL AGGLOMERATION AND THE EMERGENCE OF CLUSTERS AND NETWORKS IN NANOTECHNOLOGY

    Douglas K.R. Robinson;Arie Rip;Vincent Mangematin

  • Folk theories of nanotechnologists

    Arie Rip

  • Narrative Infrastructure in Product Creation Processes

    J. Jasper Deuten;Arie Rip

  • A co-evolutionary approach to reflexive governance - and its ironies

    Arie Rip

  • The Nelson-Winter-Dosi model and synthetic dye chemistry

    H. van den Belt;Arie Rip

  • Introduction of New Technology; Making Use of Recent Insights from Sociology and Economics of Technology

    Arie Rip

  • Constructing expertise: in a third wave of science studies?

    Arie Rip

Frequent Co-Authors

Johan Schot
Johan Schot Utrecht University
Stefan Kuhlmann
Stefan Kuhlmann University of Twente
Michel Callon
Michel Callon Mines ParisTech
John Law
John Law The Open University
Elizabeth Shove
Elizabeth Shove Lancaster University
Donald F. Westerheijden
Donald F. Westerheijden University of Twente
Luke Georghiou
Luke Georghiou University of Manchester
Vincent Mangematin
Vincent Mangematin University of Doha for Science and Technology
René Kemp
René Kemp Maastricht University
Sheila Jasanoff
Sheila Jasanoff Harvard University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering a career in Social Sciences and Humanities, there are a variety of online degrees and professional pathways available in the USA. Choosing the right program involves considering factors like affordability, program length, admission requirements, and overall career goals.

For those interested in psychology, there are many affordable online psychology degrees that can help you start your journey without incurring overwhelming student debt. These programs offer flexible learning options, allowing you to balance studies with other commitments.

If social work is your passion, you might look into the easiest msw programs to get into. These programs emphasize practical skills, accessibility, and may have less competitive admissions, providing more opportunities for prospective students.

For advanced study and clinical practice, consider the psyd programs designed for those aiming for direct clinical practice in psychology. Additionally, careers in marriage and family therapy can begin with the mft programs, some of which feature accelerated online options.

Exploring these degrees can open doors to diverse, rewarding careers in counseling, therapy, research, and community services. Online study enables flexibility, making it more accessible for students balancing work, family, or other commitments.

Best Scientists Citing Arie Rip

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles