World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
43
Citations
14757
World Ranking
4275
National Ranking
172

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
35
Citations
12519
World Ranking
8850
National Ranking
171

Ismael Rafols publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ismael Rafols sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 302 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 194 publications — 62nd percentile

62% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Ismael Rafols D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ismael Rafols sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 261 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ismael Rafols is affiliated with Leiden University in the Netherlands. Their research primarily focuses on decision sciences, with a notable emphasis on the fields of statistics, probability and uncertainty, as well as economics and econometrics. Additional subfields include public health, environmental and occupational health, sociology and political science, and information systems.

Their work spans several key topics, including scientometrics and bibliometrics research, research data management practices, global public health policies and epidemiology, psychology research and bibliometrics, health and medical research impacts, computational and text analysis methods, and health systems, economic evaluations, and quality of life.

Ismael Rafols has published regularly in several academic outlets. The frequent publication venues include:

  • Scientometrics
  • Quantitative Science Studies
  • Nature
  • Health Research Policy and Systems
  • El Profesional de la Informacion

Notable recent papers authored or coauthored by Rafols reflect a range of interdisciplinary topics and are as follows:

  • "Five ways to ensure that models serve society: a manifesto," 2020, Nature
  • "Exploring why global health needs are unmet by research efforts: the potential influences of geography, industry and publication incentives," 2020, Health Research Policy and Systems
  • "Letter: A call for a radical change in research evaluation in Spain," 2021, El Profesional de la Informacion
  • "Do synthesis centers synthesize? A semantic analysis of topical diversity in research," 2020, Research Policy
  • "Bridging the divide between qualitative and quantitative science studies," 2020, Quantitative Science Studies

Their frequent coauthors include Alfredo Yegros, Andy Stirling, Jordi Molas-Gallart, Wouter van de Klippe, and Emilio Delgado López-Cózar.

Best Publications

  • Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics

    Diana Hicks;Paul Wouters;Ludo Waltman;Sarah de Rijcke

  • Is science becoming more interdisciplinary? Measuring and mapping six research fields over time

    Alan L. Porter;Ismael Rafols

  • Approaches to understanding and measuring interdisciplinary scientific research (IDR): A review of the literature

    Caroline S. Wagner;J. David Roessner;Kamau Bobb;Julie Thompson Klein

  • Diversity and network coherence as indicators of interdisciplinarity: case studies in bionanoscience

    Ismael Rafols;Martin S. Meyer;Martin S. Meyer;Martin S. Meyer

  • A global map of science based on the ISI subject categories

    Loet Leydesdorff;Ismael Rafols

  • How journal rankings can suppress interdisciplinary research: A comparison between Innovation Studies and Business & Management

    Ismael Rafols;Ismael Rafols;Loet Leydesdorff;Alice O'Hare;Paul Nightingale

  • Science overlay maps: A new tool for research policy and library management

    Ismael Rafols;Alan L. Porter;Loet Leydesdorff

  • Five ways to ensure that models serve society: a manifesto.

    Andrea Saltelli;Gabriele Bammer;Isabelle Bruno;Erica Charters

  • Does Interdisciplinary Research Lead to Higher Citation Impact? The Different Effect of Proximal and Distal Interdisciplinarity.

    Alfredo Yegros-Yegros;Ismael Rafols;Pablo D’Este

  • Indicators of the interdisciplinarity of journals: Diversity, centrality, and citations

    Loet Leydesdorff;Ismael Rafols

  • Global maps of science based on the new Web-of-Science categories

    Loet Leydesdorff;Stephen Carley;Ismael Rafols

  • Distributions of avalanches in martensitic transformations.

    Eduard Vives;Jordi Ortín;Lluís Mañosa;Ismael Ràfols

  • Interactive overlay maps for US patent (USPTO) data based on International Patent Classification (IPC)

    Loet Leydesdorff;Duncan Kushnir;Ismael Rafols

  • How cross-disciplinary is bionanotechnology? Explorations in the specialty of molecular motors

    Ismael Rafols;Martin S. Meyer;Martin S. Meyer;Martin S. Meyer

  • Content-based and algorithmic classifications of journals: Perspectives on the dynamics of scientific communication and indexer effects

    Ismael Rafols;Loet Leydesdorff

  • Patent overlay mapping: Visualizing technological distance

    Luciano Kay;Nils C. Newman;Jan L. Youtie;Alan L. Porter

  • Interactive overlays: a new method for generating global journal maps from Web-of-Science data

    Loet Leydesdorff;Ismael Rafols

  • Big Pharma, little science? A bibliometric perspective on Big Pharma's R&D decline

    Ismael Rafols;Ismael Rafols;Michael M. Hopkins;Jarno Hoekman;Josh Siepel

  • INTERFACE GROWTH AND PATTERN FORMATION IN BACTERIAL COLONIES

    M. Matsushita;J. Wakita;H. Itoh;I. Ràfols

  • Why researchers publish in non-mainstream journals: Training, knowledge bridging, and gap filling

    Diego Chavarro;Puay Tang;Ismael Rafols;Ismael Rafols

  • How journal rankings can suppress interdisciplinarity: the case of innovation studies and business and management

    I. Rafols;L. Leydesdorff;A. O'Hare;P. Nightingale

  • Interactive Overlay Maps for US Patent (USPTO) Data Based on International Patent Classifications (IPC)

    Loet Leydesdorff;Duncan Kushnir;Ismael Rafols

Frequent Co-Authors

Loet Leydesdorff
Loet Leydesdorff University of Amsterdam
Martin Meyer
Martin Meyer University of Kent
Andrew Stirling
Andrew Stirling University of Sussex
Alan L. Porter
Alan L. Porter Georgia Institute of Technology
Thed N. van Leeuwen
Thed N. van Leeuwen Leiden University
Alex Coad
Alex Coad Waseda University
Adrian Smith
Adrian Smith University of Oxford
Paul Wouters
Paul Wouters Leiden University
Antoni Planes
Antoni Planes University of Barcelona
Antony M. Carr
Antony M. Carr University of Sussex

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities opens the door to various rewarding online degree options. Many students are drawn to msw programs online, which provide flexibility and affordability as you train for a meaningful career in social work. For those interested in becoming a Board Certified Behavior Analyst, bcba programs online offer practical coursework to prepare you for behavioral analysis roles in schools, healthcare, and community settings.

Speed is another factor for career-changers or working professionals. accelerated social work programs let you earn your master’s sooner, getting you into the field faster. Similarly, if psychology interests you, an accelerated psychology bachelor's degree online enables you to build a strong foundation for graduate school or immediate employment.

These online options are designed for flexibility and affordability, helping you balance your studies with other commitments. No matter your focus—social work, psychology, or behavioral analysis—online degrees provide clear career pathways that address community needs while offering personal fulfillment.

Best Scientists Citing Ismael Rafols

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles