World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Mark A. Bradford

Mark A. Bradford

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
85
Citations
42142
World Ranking
615
National Ranking
216

Mark A. Bradford publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark A. Bradford sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 233 publications — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Mark A. Bradford D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark A. Bradford sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 85 D-Index — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mark A. Bradford is affiliated with Yale University in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on Environmental Science and Agricultural and Biological Sciences, contributing extensively to these fields through numerous publications.

The main topics of their work include:

  • Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies
  • Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
  • Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology
  • Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics
  • Forest Management and Policy

Bradford has published in several frequent venues, including:

  • Environmental Research Letters
  • Biogeochemistry
  • Global Change Biology
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Nature Climate Change

Among recent papers, notable examples are:

  • Evidence for large microbial-mediated losses of soil carbon under anthropogenic warming, 2021, Nature Reviews Earth & Environment
  • A trait-based understanding of wood decomposition by fungi, 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Soil organic matter protects US maize yields and lowers crop insurance payouts under drought, 2021, Environmental Research Letters
  • The functional role of ericoid mycorrhizal plants and fungi on carbon and nitrogen dynamics in forests, 2022, New Phytologist
  • A stoichiometric approach to estimate sources of mineral-associated soil organic matter, 2023, Global Change Biology

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Bradford include:

  • Elisabeth B. Ward
  • Emily E. Oldfield
  • Sara E. Kuebbing
  • Alexander Polussa
  • Marlyse C. Duguid

Their work spans various subfields that underline the interdisciplinary nature of their research:

  • Global and Planetary Change
  • Ecology
  • Soil Science
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation
  • Plant Science

Best Publications

  • Toward an ecological classification of soil bacteria.

    Noah Fierer;Noah Fierer;Mark A. Bradford;Robert B. Jackson

  • The influence of soil properties on the structure of bacterial and fungal communities across land-use types

    Christian L. Lauber;Michael S. Strickland;Mark A. Bradford;Noah Fierer

  • Comparative metagenomic, phylogenetic and physiological analyses of soil microbial communities across nitrogen gradients.

    Noah Fierer;Christian L Lauber;Kelly S Ramirez;Jesse Zaneveld

  • Temperature and soil organic matter decomposition rates – synthesis of current knowledge and a way forward

    Richard T. Conant;Richard T. Conant;Michael G. Ryan;Göran I. Ågren;Hannah E. Birge

  • Soil-carbon response to warming dependent on microbial physiology

    Steven D. Allison;Matthew D. Wallenstein;Mark A. Bradford

  • Quantifying global soil carbon losses in response to warming

    Thomas W. Crowther;Katherine E.O. Todd-Brown;Clara W. Rowe;William R. Wieder

  • Global patterns in belowground communities.

    Noah Fierer;Michael S. Strickland;Daniel Liptzin;Mark A. Bradford

  • Mapping tree density at a global scale

    T. W. Crowther;H. B. Glick;K. R. Covey;C. Bettigole

  • Thermal adaptation of soil microbial respiration to elevated temperature.

    Mark A. Bradford;Christian A. Davies;Serita D. Frey;Thomas R. Maddox

  • Testing the functional significance of microbial community composition

    Michael S. Strickland;Christian Lauber;Noah Fierer;Noah Fierer;Mark A. Bradford

  • Managing uncertainty in soil carbon feedbacks to climate change

    Mark A. Bradford;William R. Wieder;William R. Wieder;Gordon B. Bonan;Noah Fierer;Noah Fierer

  • Microbial formation of stable soil carbon is more efficient from belowground than aboveground input

    Noah W. Sokol;Noah W. Sokol;Mark A. Bradford

  • Pathways of mineral-associated soil organic matter formation: Integrating the role of plant carbon source, chemistry, and point of entry

    Noah W. Sokol;Noah W. Sokol;Jonathan Sanderman;Mark A. Bradford

  • Global meta-analysis of the relationship between soil organic matter and crop yields

    Emily E. Oldfield;Mark A. Bradford;Stephen A. Wood;Stephen A. Wood

  • Differential growth responses of soil bacterial taxa to carbon substrates of varying chemical recalcitrance

    Katherine C. Goldfarb;Katherine C. Goldfarb;Ulas Karaoz;China A. Hanson;Clark A. Santee

  • Understanding the dominant controls on litter decomposition

    Mark A. Bradford;Björn Berg;Daniel S. Maynard;William R. Wieder

  • Consistent effects of nitrogen fertilization on soil bacterial communities in contrasting systems

    Kelly S. Ramirez;Christian L. Lauber;Rob Knight;Rob Knight;Mark A. Bradford

  • Global decomposition experiment shows soil animal impacts on decomposition are climate-dependent

    Diana H. Wall;Mark A. Bradford;Mark G. St. John;John A. Trofymow

  • Evidence for the primacy of living root inputs, not root or shoot litter, in forming soil organic carbon

    Noah W. Sokol;Sara. E. Kuebbing;Sara. E. Kuebbing;Elena Karlsen‐Ayala;Mark A. Bradford

  • Where, when and how plant-soil feedback matters in a changing world

    Wim H. van der Putten;Mark A. Bradford;E. Pernilla Brinkman;Tess F. J. van de Voorde

  • Mapping Tree Density at the Global Scale

    K. R. Covey;T. W. Crowther;H. Glick;C. Bettigole

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert J. Warren
Robert J. Warren Buffalo State College
Noah Fierer
Noah Fierer University of Colorado Boulder
Thomas W. Crowther
Thomas W. Crowther King Abdullah University of Science and Technology
Daniel S. Maynard
Daniel S. Maynard University of Chicago
Michael S. Strickland
Michael S. Strickland University of Idaho
Stephen A. Wood
Stephen A. Wood Yale University
William R. Wieder
William R. Wieder National Center for Atmospheric Research
Fernando T. Maestre
Fernando T. Maestre King Abdullah University of Science and Technology
James F. Reynolds
James F. Reynolds Duke University
Serita D. Frey
Serita D. Frey University of New Hampshire

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Ecology and Evolution as a field of study in the USA opens doors to a variety of related online degrees and unique career pathways. Many students consider branching into diverse and interdisciplinary programs that combine environmental science with communication, education, or library research roles.

For those seeking affordable grad school options, the quickest cheapest masters degree programs offer flexibility and value. Students interested in research, data management, or academic support might pursue a library science degree as an alternative or complement to ecology studies.

Communication and public engagement are vital in environmental work. Some transition into health or science communication by completing asha online slp programs, which can be pursued online while maintaining high standards. If your undergraduate studies are in an unrelated field, online bridge programs non-SLP majors also offer structured pathways to shift into communication sciences.

With so many flexible, accredited options, you can tailor your academic journey to meet your career goals in ecology, communication, or related research fields.

Best Scientists Citing Mark A. Bradford

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles