World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
58
Citations
18900
World Ranking
2506
National Ranking
888

William R. Wieder publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William R. Wieder sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 153 publications — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

William R. Wieder D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William R. Wieder sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 58 D-Index — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

William R. Wieder is a researcher affiliated with the National Center for Atmospheric Research in the United States. Their work primarily focuses on environmental science with a strong emphasis on agricultural and biological sciences.

The scientist's research spans several subfields including global and planetary change, soil science, atmospheric science, ecology, and environmental chemistry. This broad disciplinary engagement reflects in their exploration of complex earth system processes.

Key topics addressed in their publications include:

  • Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
  • Climate variability and models
  • Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology
  • Geology and Paleoclimatology Research
  • Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics
  • Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics

William R. Wieder has authored impactful papers published in various scientific venues. Notable recent papers include:

  • Persistence of soil organic carbon caused by functional complexity (2020, Nature Geoscience)
  • Ubiquity of human-induced changes in climate variability (2021, Earth System Dynamics)
  • The age distribution of global soil carbon inferred from radiocarbon measurements (2020, Nature Geoscience)
  • Simulating Agriculture in the Community Land Model Version 5 (2020, Journal of Geophysical Research Biogeosciences)
  • Moisture-driven divergence in mineral-associated soil carbon persistence (2023, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences)

Frequent co-authors working alongside William R. Wieder include:

  • Danica Lombardozzi
  • A. Stuart Grandy
  • Katerina Georgiou
  • Derek Pierson
  • Melannie D. Hartman

The researcher's publications have appeared in venues such as Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), Geoscientific Model Development, Global Change Biology, Biogeochemistry, and the Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems. These outlets reflect a strong focus on both the development of scientific models and empirical studies related to earth systems.

Best Publications

  • The Community Land Model version 5 : description of new features, benchmarking, and impact of forcing uncertainty

    David M. Lawrence;Rosie A. Fisher;Charles D. Koven;Keith W. Oleson

  • Quantifying global soil carbon losses in response to warming

    Thomas W. Crowther;Katherine E.O. Todd-Brown;Clara W. Rowe;William R. Wieder

  • Global soil carbon projections are improved by modelling microbial processes

    William R. Wieder;Gordon B. Bonan;Steven D. Allison

  • Persistence of soil organic carbon caused by functional complexity

    Johannes Lehmann;Johannes Lehmann;Colleen M. Hansel;Christina Kaiser;Markus Kleber

  • Managing uncertainty in soil carbon feedbacks to climate change

    Mark A. Bradford;William R. Wieder;William R. Wieder;Gordon B. Bonan;Noah Fierer;Noah Fierer

  • Beyond clay: Towards an improved set of variables for predicting soil organic matter content

    Craig Rasmussen;Katherine Heckman;William R. Wieder;Marco Keiluweit

  • Future productivity and carbon storage limited by terrestrial nutrient availability

    William R. Wieder;William R. Wieder;Cory C. Cleveland;W. Kolby Smith;W. Kolby Smith;Katherine Todd-Brown;Katherine Todd-Brown

  • Understanding the dominant controls on litter decomposition

    Mark A. Bradford;Björn Berg;Daniel S. Maynard;William R. Wieder

  • Relationships among net primary productivity, nutrients and climate in tropical rain forest: a pan‐tropical analysis

    Cory C. Cleveland;Alan R. Townsend;Philip Taylor;Silvia Alvarez-Clare

  • Toward more realistic projections of soil carbon dynamics by Earth system models

    Yiqi Luo;Yiqi Luo;Anders Ahlström;Anders Ahlström;Steven D. Allison;Niels H. Batjes

  • Large divergence of satellite and Earth system model estimates of global terrestrial CO2 fertilization

    W. Kolby Smith;W. Kolby Smith;Sasha C. Reed;Cory C. Cleveland;Ashley P. Ballantyne

  • Explicitly representing soil microbial processes in Earth system models

    William R. Wieder;Steven D. Allison;Eric A. Davidson;Katerina Georgiou;Katerina Georgiou

  • Climate fails to predict wood decomposition at regional scales

    Mark A. Bradford;Robert J. Warren;Petr Baldrian;Thomas W. Crowther

  • Integrating microbial physiology and physio-chemical principles in soils with the MIcrobial-MIneral Carbon Stabilization (MIMICS) model

    W. R. Wieder;A. S. Grandy;C. M. Kallenbach;G. B. Bonan

  • Higher climatological temperature sensitivity of soil carbon in cold than warm climates

    Charles D. Koven;Gustaf Hugelius;Gustaf Hugelius;David M. Lawrence;William R. Wieder;William R. Wieder

  • Addressing agricultural nitrogen losses in a changing climate

    Timothy M. Bowles;Shady S. Atallah;Eleanor E. Campbell;Amélie C. M. Gaudin

  • Plot-scale manipulations of organic matter inputs to soils correlate with shifts in microbial community composition in a lowland tropical rain forest

    Diana R. Nemergut;Diana R. Nemergut;Cory C. Cleveland;William R. Wieder;William R. Wieder;Christopher L. Washenberger

  • A test of the hierarchical model of litter decomposition

    Mark A Bradford;G F Ciska Veen;Anne Bonis;Ella M Bradford

  • Multiple models and experiments underscore large uncertainty in soil carbon dynamics

    Benjamin N. Sulman;Benjamin N. Sulman;Jessica A. M. Moore;Jessica A. M. Moore;Rose Abramoff;Colin Averill

  • The age distribution of global soil carbon inferred from radiocarbon measurements

    Zheng Shi;Steven D. Allison;Yujie He;Paul A. Levine

  • Controls over leaf litter decomposition in wet tropical forests

    William R. Wieder;Cory C. Cleveland;Alan R. Townsend

  • Evaluating litter decomposition in earth system models with long-term litterbag experiments: an example using the Community Land Model version 4 (CLM4).

    Gordon B. Bonan;Melannie D. Hartman;William J. Parton;William R. Wieder

Frequent Co-Authors

Cory C. Cleveland
Cory C. Cleveland University of Montana
Gordon B. Bonan
Gordon B. Bonan National Center for Atmospheric Research
Alan R. Townsend
Alan R. Townsend University of Montana
Danica Lombardozzi
Danica Lombardozzi National Center for Atmospheric Research
David M. Lawrence
David M. Lawrence National Center for Atmospheric Research
Mark A. Bradford
Mark A. Bradford Yale University
Charles D. Koven
Charles D. Koven Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Joshua P. Schimel
Joshua P. Schimel University of California, Santa Barbara
Stephen A. Wood
Stephen A. Wood Yale University
Asmeret Asefaw Berhe
Asmeret Asefaw Berhe University of California, Merced

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Ecology and Evolution in the USA can open doors to diverse, interdisciplinary career pathways in science and beyond. Many students supplement their ecological knowledge with advanced online degrees that address human impacts, social change, and mental health.

For those interested in social justice and community health, lcsw online programs offer flexible options to become licensed clinical social workers. If you aim to fast-track your education, consider accelerated masters psychology programs that allow quick entry into behavioral sciences careers.

Students passionate about supporting human well-being can also pursue an online masters degree in mental health counseling. This path leads to direct work in mental health advocacy and support. Additionally, a forensic psychology degree uniquely combines psychology, law, and science, blending investigative skills with understanding of ecological and societal influences.

These programs provide knowledge and skills to help bridge scientific understanding and societal needs, equipping graduates for impactful roles across research, policy, and public service.

Best Scientists Citing William R. Wieder

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles